Perspectivism Narrow and Wide: An Examination of Nietzsche's Limited Perspectivism from a Daoist Lens (original) (raw)
Related papers
Global Journal of Cultural Studies, 2022
This paper examines Asouzu's complementarism and Nietzsche's perspectivism with a view to showing how convergence and divergence of thoughts in the Asouzuan and Nietzschean philosophy contexts can inform crosscultural philosophizing. Asouzu's complementarism projects multiplicity of perspectives as constitutive of reality and construes it as a composite of missing links, while Nietzsche's perspectivism also postulates multiplicity of views and interpretations as he believes that reality is deeply rooted in infinite possibilities. Attempts are made, in this paper, to articulate the essential principles of Asouzu's complementarism and to highlight the dynamics of Nietzsche's perspectivism in a fruitful encounter of the African tradition of thought which Asouzu belongs to and the European thought tradition which Nietzsche belongs to. These two traditions of thought will be critically x-rayed to show their implications for cross-cultural philosophizing. Simply put, the paper will show how the philosophical studies of the ideas of complementarism and perspectivism in the thoughts of the German philosopher, Friedrich Nietzsche, and the African philosopher, Innocent Asouzu, can enrich the cultural understanding of human societies and ideas for the betterment of universal values and humanism.
Epitemic Perspectivism and Living Well in the Thought of Nietzsche and Zhuangzi
2016
Nietzsche and Zhuangzi offer epistemological views of perspectivism that inform a normative conception of living well. Perspectivism for both thinkers point to the limits of human knowledge, in that both thinkers deny the possibility of attaining knowledge traditionally considered important to living well. Both also endorse a notion of the good life that takes the value of knowledge to be restricted. Nietzschean perspectivism devalues the pursuit of knowledge that does not pertain to human interests. Zhuangist perspectivism devalues the pursuit of knowledge that does not facilitate attainment of the normative Way. I respond to Berry’s therapeutic reading of Nietzsche in order to argue that Nietzsche rejects knowledge that does not speak to human interests. I also draw upon Ivanhoe and Berkson’s reading of Zhuangzi’s epistemology to argue that his perspectivism informs a view of the good life that values intuitive knowledge and its employment of the natural mechanism (tian ji), over ...
The Future of Nietzsche's Perspectivism as Political Consensus
Recoletos Multidisciplinary Research Journal, 2017
In this paper, I delve on Nietzsche's concept of perspectivism and how it becomes relevant amid contemporary society's openness to relative standpoints. The foremost era that reflects this description points to postmodernism as a politics of difference. Nietzsche's perspectivism is generally a critique of the conditions that absolutize truth. While this may seem a valiant opening for a welcoming era on an epistemological standpoint, it does not however do away with its own paradoxes. I contend whether this fits well with postmodernism and its ironic relationship to truth and asserts further that the conditions for Nietzsche's perspectivism can only achieve its future if it hermeneutically stands as political consensus. Later, I will present the features of this perspectivism as political consensus and how it can be viable in postmodernity.
PERSPECTIVES ON PERSPECTIVISM: NIETZSCHE AND HIS COMMENTATORS by
2007
This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Department of Philosophy at ScholarWorks @ Georgia State University. It has been accepted for inclusion in Philosophy Theses by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks @ Georgia State University. For more information, please
Nietzsche as ‘Europe’s Buddha’ and ‘Asia’s Superman’
Sophia International Journal of Philosophy & Traditions, 2008
Nietzsche represents in an interesting way the well-worn Western approach to Asian philosophical and religious thinking: initial excitement, then neglect by appropriation, and swift rejection when found to be incompatible with one’s own tradition, roots are inexorably traced back to the ‘ancient’ Greeks. Yet, Nietzsche’s philosophical critique and methods - such as‘ perspectivism’ - offer an instructive route through which to better understand another tradition even if the sole purpose of this exercise is to perceive one’s own limitations through the eyes of the other: a self-destruktion of sorts. To help correct this shortcoming and begin the long overdue task of even-handed dialogue - or contemporary comparative philosophy - we will be served well by looking at Nietzsche’s mistakes, which in turn informed the tragic critic of the West of the last century, Martin Heidegger. We may learn here not to cast others in one’s own troubled image; and not to reverse cultural icons: Europe’s Superman, and Asia’s Buddha.
EPISTEMIC PERSPECTIVISM AND LIVING WELL IN THE THOUGHT OF NIETZSCHE AND ZHUANGZI
Nietzsche and Zhuangzi offer epistemological views of perspectivism that inform a normative conception of living well. Perspectivism for both thinkers point to the limits of human knowledge, in that both thinkers deny the possibility of attaining knowledge traditionally considered important to living well. Both also endorse a notion of the good life that takes the value of knowledge to be restricted. Nietzschean perspectivism devalues the pursuit of knowledge that does not pertain to human interests. Zhuangist perspectivism devalues the pursuit of knowledge that does not facilitate attainment of the normative Way. I respond to Berry's therapeutic reading of Nietzsche in order to argue that Nietzsche rejects knowledge that does not speak to human interests. I also draw upon Ivanhoe and Berkson's reading of Zhuangzi's epistemology to argue that his perspectivism informs a view of the good life that values intuitive knowledge and its employment of the natural mechanism (tian ji), over the pursuit of theoretical knowledge, which includes asking grand questions about the workings and origin of the universe. Nietzsche and Zhuangzi (莊子) each offer an analysis on the nature of perspectives in order to answer the epistemological question of how humans know anything. Both thinkers believe perspectives constrain the possibilities of what humans are capable of knowing, and they suggest that the cognitive capacities of humans play an essential role in circumscribing the possibilities for what is knowable. In this sense, each thinker is a skeptic about knowledge concerning the answers to certain questions. The thinkers in this study believe such knowledge is unimportant toward the goal of living well. In their respective views of the good life, they deny the importance of knowledge traditionally considered important to their respective philosophical opponents. The readings of Nietzsche and Zhuangzi presented reveal the epistemological basis which unpins their respective normative commitments to
Perspectivism as a Way of Knowing in the Zhuangzi
A perspectivist theory is usually taken to mean that (1) our knowledge of the world is inevitably shaped by our particular perspectives, (2) any one of these perspectives is as good as any other, and (3) any claims to objective or authoritative knowledge are consequently without ground. Recent scholarship on Nietzsche, however, has challenged the prevalent view that the philosopher holds and , arguing instead that his perspectivism aims at attaining a greater level of objectivity. In this essay, I attempt a structurally similar reinterpretation of Zhuangzi's perspectivism. I argue that while the Chinese thinker sees all knowledge as perspective-dependent, he thinks that some perspectives are broader and more accurate than others. He utilizes shifts in perspective precisely in order to attain these superior perspectives, which constitute what he calls da zhi 大知, or "greater knowledge." Whereas Nietzsche sees his perspectivism as methodologically continuous with the sciences, Zhuangzi's "greater knowledge" has the goal of ensuring our survival and well-being in the everyday world.