Constructivism and Mystical Experience (original) (raw)

2019, Constructivist Foundations

Abstract

Context • Constructivism and mystical traditions each recognize human cognitive limits. However, the former puts its faith in its processes and the latter reveres the product. > Problem • Individuals recursively construct their realities in and through their experiences. Often the reality constructed is updated, however this type of reconstructive reflection does not happen in the same way with religious experiences and beliefs. Ernst von Glasersfeld considered the rational and the mystical as two separate types of knowing, providing two different accounts of experience. An alternative approach is to examine the process of thinking to see if there may be synergies between so-called rational thinking and mystical experience, particularly when certain types of new ideas emerge. > Method • I link constructiv-ist ideas with accounts of mystical experience prioritizing wonder, insight and the process of coming-to-know. Con-structivism is described mainly with reference to Ernst von Glasersfeld's work, particularly emphasizing the impossibility of ontology and drawing attention to some references to mystical experience in the constructivist literature. > Results • I note that there are grounds for regarding rational and mystical knowing as belonging in different domains. Radical constructivism maintains that any mind-independent reality is essentially unknowable. In this epis-temological framework, gaps necessarily arise in understanding when existing concepts do not fit experience. Forms of wonder may arise from experience of such gaps leading to novel insights and more viable reality constructions. Finally, I suggest that there are grounds for considering such epiphanies sacred, and in addition, as in certain types of mystical experience, they may be related to personal development through recognizing harmony between experiences over time. > Implications • There are moments during the construction of concepts when previous concepts do not work and new constructions have not emerged. Such moments have a potentially mystical quality and, if so, are known as epiphanies. So, when gaps occur in the process of knowledge construction it may be helpful to let the mind rest and contemplate. The origin of the ideas that emerge is mysterious, and the ideas may or may not be viable.

Loading...

Loading Preview

Sorry, preview is currently unavailable. You can download the paper by clicking the button above.

References (52)

  1. Bateson G. (1979) Mind and nature: A necessary unity. New York, Dutton.
  2. Bateson G. (1991) Sacred unity: Further steps to an ecology of mind. Edited by R. E. A Donaldson. Harper Collins, New York.
  3. Bateson G. & Bateson M. C. (1987) Angels fear: An investigation into the nature and mean- ing of the sacred. London, Rider.
  4. Bateson M. C. (1972) Our own metaphor: A per- sonal account of a conference on the effects of conscious purpose on human adaptation.
  5. Alfred A. Knopf, New York.
  6. Cardellini L. & Glasersfeld E. von (2006) The foundations of radical constructivism: An interview with Ernst von Glasersfeld. Foundations of Chemistry 8: 177-187. ▶︎ https://cepa.info/1558
  7. DelMonte M. M. (2012) Mindfulness and aware- ness: Constructivist, psychodynamic and Eastern perspectives. International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction 10(3): 311-329.
  8. DelMonte M. M. & Kenny V. (1985) Models of meditation. British Journal of Psychotherapy 1(3): 197-214.
  9. Dewey J. (1934) A common faith. Yale University Press, Clinton MA.
  10. Dewey J. (1960) The quest for certainty. Cap- ricorn, New York. Originally published in 1929. Dewey J. & Bentley A. (1949) Knowing and the known. Beacon Press, Boston.
  11. Foerster H. von (1991) Through the eyes of the other. In: Steier F. (ed.) Research and reflexivity. Sage, London: 63-75. ▶︎ https://cepa.info/1729
  12. Forman R. K. C. (1990) Eckhart, Gezucken, and the ground of the soul. In: Forman R. K. C. (ed.) The problem of pure consciousness: Mysticism and philosophy. Oxford Univer- sity Press: New York: 98-121.
  13. Gash H. (1993) Stereotyping and constructivism: Learning to be men and women. Cyber- netics and Human Knowing 1(4): 43-50. ▶︎ https://cepa.info/5525
  14. Gash H. (2004) Spirituality, uncertainty and tolerance. In: Lasker G. E. & K. Hiwaki. (eds.) Personal and spiritual develop- ment in the world of cultural diver- sity. Volume I. International Institute for Advanced Studies, Windsor ON: 63-68. ▶︎ https://cepa.info/5522
  15. Gash H. (2014a) Constructing constructivism. Constructivist Foundations 9(3): 302-310. ▶︎ https://constructivist.info/9/3/302
  16. Gash H. (2014b) Author's response: Per- spectives on RC and teaching. Con- structivist Foundations 9(3): 321-327. ▶︎ https://constructivist.info/9/3/321
  17. Gash H. (2018) Constructivism and mysticism. In: Lasker G. E. & Hiwaki K. (eds.) Personal and spiritual development in the world of cultural diversity. Volume XV. International Institute for Advanced Studies: Windsor ON: 7-11. ▶︎ https://cepa.info/5523
  18. Gash H. & Shine Thompson M. (2002) Con- structivism and Celtic spirituality. In: Lasker G. E. (ed.) Advances in Sociocybernetics and Human Development. Volume X. Interna- tional Institute for Advanced Studies: Wind- sor ON: 113-118. ▶︎ https://cepa.info/5521
  19. Gellman J. (2017) Mysticism. In: Zalta N. (ed.) The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy. https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/mysticism
  20. Glasersfeld E. von (1962) First draft of an English input procedure for mechani- cal translation. Methodos 14(54): 47-79. ▶︎ https://cepa.info/1295
  21. Glasersfeld E. von (1969) Semantics and the syntactic classification of words. In: Proceed- ings of the third international conference on computational linguistics. ICCL, Sanga S'by. ▶︎ https://cepa.info/1308
  22. Glasersfeld E. von (1974) Piaget and the radical constructivist epistemology. In: Smock C. D. & Glasersfeld E. von (eds.) Epistemology and education. Follow Through Publications, Athens GA: 1-24. ▶︎ https://cepa.info/1324
  23. Glasersfeld E. von (1983) Learning as construc- tive activity. In: Bergeron J. C. & Herscov- ics N. (ed.) Proceedings of the 5th Annual Meeting of the North American Group of Psychology in Mathematics Education, Volume 1. PME-NA, Montreal: 41-101. ▶︎ https://cepa.info/1373
  24. Glasersfeld E. von (1995) Radical constructiv- ism: A way of knowing and learning. Falmer Press, London. ▶︎ https://cepa.info/1462
  25. HUGH GaSH obtained his doctorate at State University at Buffalo in 1974 with a thesis on moral judgment. He was a post-doctoral researcher at the University of Georgia with Charles Smock where he met Ernst von Glasersfeld whose ideas had a major influence on his work. Hugh worked at St Patrick's College Dublin until 2010. He is an Emeritus Associate Professor in the School of Human Development in the Institute of Education in Dublin City University. Gash is a member of the International Institute for Advanced Studies in Systems Research and Cybernetics. He has published extensively on applications of constructivism, details of which may be found on his website https://sites.google.com/dcu.ie/hughgashwebpage { https://constructivist.info/15/1/001.gash
  26. Glasersfeld E. von (2002) The construction of knowledge. In: Schnitman D. F. & Schnit- man J. (eds.) New paradigms, culture, and subjectivity. Hampton Press, Cresskill NJ: 83-92. Spanish original published in 1994. ▶︎ https://cepa.info/1571
  27. Glasersfeld E. von (2007) The logic of scientific fallibility. In: Glasersfeld E. von (ed.) Key works in radical constructivism (edited by Marie Larochelle). Sense Publishers, Rot- terdam: 119-128. Spanish original published in 1988. ▶︎ https://cepa.info/1567
  28. Head M. G., Wind-Mozley M. & Flegg P. J. (2017) Inadvisable anti-vaccination senti- ment: Human Papilloma Virus immunisa- tion falsely under the microscope. NPJ Vaccines 2(1): 6. https://www.nature.com/ articles/s41541-017-0004-x
  29. Huxley A. (1945) The perennial philosophy. Harper & Bros, New York.
  30. Huxley A. (1954) The doors of perception: Heaven and hell. Chatto & Windus, New York.
  31. James W. (1902) The varieties of religious experi- ence (Gifford Lectures). Longmans Green & Co: London.
  32. Jones R. H. (2016) Philosophy of mysticism. State University Press of New York: Albany.
  33. Kahneman D. (2012) Thinking, fast and slow. Penguin, London.
  34. Katz S. (1992) Mystical speech and mystical meaning. In: Katz S. T. (ed.) Mysticism and language. Oxford University Press, New York: 3-41.
  35. Koestler A. (1964) The act of creation. Penguin, New York.
  36. Kohlberg L. (1969) Stage and sequence: The cognitive-developmental approach to so- cialization. In: Goslin D. A. (ed.) Handbook of socialization theory and research. Rand McNally, Chicago: 347-480.
  37. Maturana H. R. (1988) Reality: The search for objectivity or the quest for a compelling argument. Irish Journal of Psychology 9(1): 25-82. ▶︎ https://cepa.info/598
  38. Modjeska D. (2012) The mountain. Random House: Sydney.
  39. Pappert S. (1991) Situating constructionism. In: Harel I. & Pappert S. (eds.) Constructionism. Ablex Publishing, Norwood NJ: 13-27.
  40. Piaget J. (1968) Six psychological studies. Ran- dom House, New York.
  41. Poerksen B. (2004) "We can never know what goes on in somebody else's head": Ernst von Glasersfeld on truth and viability, language and knowledge, and the premises of con- structivist education. Cybernetics and Sys- tems 35: 379-398. ▶︎ https://cepa.info/4007
  42. Riegler A. (1998) The end of science: Can we overcome cognitive limitations? Evolution & Cognition 4(1): 37-50.
  43. Riegler A. (2001a) The cognitive ratchet: The ratchet effect as a fundamental principle in evolution and cognition. Cybernet- ics and Systems 32(3-4): 411-427. ▶︎ https://cepa.info/4210
  44. Riegler A. (2001b) Towards a radical con- structivist understanding of science. Foundations of Science 6(1-3): 1-30. ▶︎ https://cepa.info/1860
  45. Riegler A. (2001c) The role of anticipation in cognition. In: Dubois D. M. (ed.) Comput- ing anticipatory systems. Proceedings of the American Institute of Physics 573: 534-541. ▶︎ https://cepa.info/4211
  46. Riegler A. (2007a) The impact of the interdis- ciplinary radical constructivist framework on cognitive research. In: Vanchevsky M. A. (ed.) Focus on cognitive psychology re- search. Nova Science Publishers, Hauppauge NY: 153-170. ▶︎ https://cepa.info/1778
  47. Riegler A. (2007b) Superstition in the machine. In: Butz M. V., Sigaud O., Pezzulo G. & Baldassarre G. (eds.) Anticipatory behavior in adaptive learning systems: From brains to individual and social behavior. Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence. Springer, New York: 57-72. ▶︎ https://cepa.info/4214
  48. Scott M. (2017) Religious language. In: Zalta E. N. (ed.) The Stanford encyclopedia of phi- losophy. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/ win2017/entries/religious-language/
  49. Sigel I. E. & Cocking R. R. (1977) Cognitive development from childhood to adolescence: A constructivist perspective. Holt, Reinhart, and Winston, New York.
  50. Stace W. T. (1961) Mysticism and philosophy. Macmillan, London. http://wudhi.azureweb- sites.net/mysticism/ws/wts-mp%20-%202.
  51. htm Underhill E. (1911) Mysticism: A study in nature and development of spiritual consciousness. Christian Classics Ethereal Library, Grand Rapids MI. http://www.ccel.org/ccel/under- hill/mysticism.pdf
  52. Vico G. (1988) On the ancient wisdom of the Italians. Translated with an introduction and notes by L. M. Palmer. Cornell University Press, Ithaca. Latin original published in 1710.