Everyday Abstractions. The Immediate Force of Choreography (original) (raw)
Related papers
Christa Sommerer & Laurent Mignonneau: the Artwork as a Living System 1992-2022, 2023
Christa Sommerer’s and Laurent Mignonneau’s oeuvre represents one of the most important chapters in the recent history of progressive art and one of the most relevant examples of today’s artistic avant-garde. In this paper, I will examine up close a number of these works, selected from among the broad spectrum of pieces the pair has produced during thirty years of shared artistic activity to identify the sources of their exceptional artistic value and show how these two artists address in their work issues of particular relevance to the world of today. I will tie together my reflections on individual pieces to provide a holistic view of Mignonneau and Sommerer’s art. However, to analyze and interpret these works with due regard for their overall complexity, I will identify and describe several critical artistic, theoretical and philosophical contexts expressed in them. I will also attempt to identify, indicate, and characterize the properties and tendencies that produce these contexts and play a key role in Sommerer’s and Mignonneau’s art. It is only by combining these two perspectives — one focused on individual works of art and their properties, the other directing attention to the relations linking the works with broader processes—that we can grasp the specificity of this oeuvre as a whole. The overarching framework for all contexts reflected in this oeuvre is new media art. Mignonneau’s and Sommerer’s work essentially falls entirely within this #eld. My definition of new media art — a vast and internally diverse current in contemporary art that has been developing since the early 1950s — situates it at the intersection of three defining aspects: new-mediality, transmediality, and transdisciplinary. These aspects will provide the primary contexts guiding my considerations here, both in themselves and as sources of other essential frames of reference.
Reconceptualizing Educational Research Methodology
Edit from within! Become world! Value, don't evaluate! Lure the feeling! Know not what a body can do! Create with concepts! Make multiple sense! Affirm all that appears! Play the differential! Speculate! Engage relations of tension! Make the relations felt! Create degrees of intimacy! Propose! Transduce! Create affinities of purpose! Forget what you feel! Return the return! Transvaluate! Pay attention! Go to the limit! (Manning, 2008). What does a philosophy produce? How might philosophy and methodology entangle, blur, respond, engage, interact, contradict, argue, provoke? Erin Manning’s process philosophy attunes researchers to the potential of difference. Manning grounds her philosophy in the notion that doing is thinking, that there is thought in the act, and that philosophy is an experimental practice that coexists with art; it is “pathfinding in the making” (Manning & Massumi, 2013, n.p.). Further, Manning posits that research and creation come together in their product, an...
Navigating artistic inquiry in a creativeproduction thesis: the narrative and illustrative potentials of realismo maravilhoso, 2018
Abstract This article considers the concept of artistic research as an approach to knowledge generation and understanding. It begins with a brief consideration of the historical development of artistic inquiry and its relationship with research processes and artefacts. It then discusses a specific artistic PhD research project, “Magical realities – A creative consideration of the narrative and illustrative potentials of realismo maravilhoso”, as a form of a ‘creative-production’. The thesis project, which is formatted as a printed storybook, explores the potentials of polyvocal narration and syncretic illustration when aspects of a narrative can be digitally expanded. In actioning the iterative development of the research, a methodological framework is used that integrates heuristic inquiry and reflexive practice. Enabled through this are three interrelated methods: designer’s journals, iterative assembly, overviewing and testing, and the strategic use of feedback.
Discourses of Intervention: A Language for Art and Science Collaboration
2000
This article explores how two different kinds of subjects, an architect-cum-digital media artist and an engineer, tease out and negotiate ideas from alien contexts. Brought together by a desire to explore the cybridity of physicality through artistic expressions, we recognise the need for a new language and ways of speaking that open potentials for the creation of new realities. Postcolonial discourse and the concept of vertical and horizontal discourses theorised by educational sociologist Basil Bernstein will provide the lenses by which we describe our collaboration, which is partially performed herein through language. We propose to describe our discourse of intervention as discourses in which each dialogue is a deliberative "language game" played out through the metonymy of ideas in our fields (e.g. belonging and fuzzy membership functions) to produce a subject always different to itself. By interjecting interventions between and among our respective territories of knowledge, we hope to create a new mode of practice that is neither trapped by our territories nor a duplex copy of them, but rather multidimensional transmissions reinterpreting our meaning structures.
Bending Spaces: Learning and Producing While Being on Show (2013)
The invitation to participate in the conference, and to address the topic of exhibiting and curating graphic design, offers us the opportunity to reflect on some aspects of our approach to design as a (potentially) critically-engaged practice. More specifically it spurs us to reconsider to what degree the notion of 'embodied criticality' -as proposed by ~heorist Irit Rogoffl -which is central to our practice, shapes the moments in which our work directly meets and interfaces with the public.
Thought in the act: Passages in the ecology of experience
Contemporary Political Theory, 2015
This book feels very timely. After a thrust of writing in political theory looking at embodied practices and their significance for our lives together in communities, such as Carrie Noland's Agency and Embodiment and Manning's own Politics of Touch, and perhaps most significantly Jane Bennett's Vibrant Matter and Diana Coole and Samantha Frost's New Materialisms, we are now presented with this book which strives to explore creative practices as a form of thinking. Its underlying goal is a very ambitious one, to 'open philosophy to the outside' as it argues that 'every practice is a mode of thought, already in the act.' (vii). Its mission then is not to philosophize about artistic action as the underlying argument is that artistic action is in and of itself already a form of thought. Thus the aim becomes significant both in method and in argument; the authors do not analyse practices; they try to understand them from within, to unravel their logic and unfold their intricacies. This book focuses on creating a relational ecology in more than one way. It, in its own unique mode of writing, allows the reader to partake in one such ecology, in a mode of being in which different discourses can live together without the need to prioritize one over the other; a life in which rationality or understanding take manifold meanings, and difference, in the deepest meaning of the phrase, is celebrated. The book is divided into two parts: the first, Passages, provides readings of practices. The first chapter entitled neurodiversity is a reading of the experience of perception, focusing on the experience of perception of autistic people, as opposed to neuroreductionism. Massumi and Manning want us to return to the experience of a whole moment bringing the experience of perception back into relational terms. The next chapter looks at a possible dialogue between mathematician and philosopher Alfred North Whitehead and the work of architects and artists Arkawa and Gins. We have a verbal travel through the experience of receiving their work, experiencing their re-configuration of spaces and intervention into the physicality of our lives. The next two chapters are devoted to readings of two artists: influential
Devising as a way of performing: enacted or embodied?
2012
This presentation will investigate notions of the „space between‟ (Teymur, 2002) discourses in terms of heightening meaning and values in creative collaboration. Necdet Teymur (2002) in his paper „Spaces Between Disciplines‟ illustrates that disciplines form their own distinct communities of practice. These discipline communities create their own boundaries: „they form solidarities, define common-purposes and invent defense mechanisms‟ (Teymur, 2002: 99). Teymur states that this is to protect their knowledge or territory base. He makes the following comment regarding interdisciplinarity: „a typical field of interdisciplinarity (as distinct from those of disciplines) is precisely a field not so much of agreements, alliances or co-operative intentions as protected boundaries, walls and barbed wires‟ (ibid: 101).