THE GREEK POLIS: EQUALITY, CONSTRAINT AND FREEDOM / The English translation of «Égalité, liberté et contrainte dans la Polis grecque» (original) (raw)

Abstract

Egalitarianism was inherent to the Greek polis. However, the egalitarian substratum did not inhibit the existence of social, economic and political differences. The cases of Athens and Sparta show how a different understanding of the idea of equality could lead to completely different political systems. The democratic equality in Athens was an equality of the unequal and it was limited to the political sphere, while social inequalities persisted. This discordance inevitably led to the separation between political and social realm in both theory and practice. Since for democrats the social sphere came second to the political, the demos could permit itself a wide extent of freedom in private life. The direct connection between equality and the rule of law guaranteed the political freedom of the people, because the law was perceived as an instrument of self-discipline of the demos and disciplining those who might endanger its supremacy. Thus in Athens equality became one of the principal sources of freedom in private and public sphere. Several peculiarities of the Spartan constitution (relative simple structure, causal relationship between the social and political order, identification with immutability and association of its genesis with the divine sphere) caused that in Sparta equality at no time was perceived as the outcome of a political process and was never restricted to the political sphere. Consequently, the homoios-ideal, was perceived as something above the homoioi. Since this equality of the equal (similar) at the same time covered all aspects of the Spartan way of life, it was rather a source of constraint than of freedom. In relation to the other groups in Sparta the homoioi were the ruling class, but in relation to the Spartan constitution they were “slaves”. The democratic or isotēs kind of equality can easily be identified with arithmetical equality, since in it, all citizens, whatever their value, enjoy the same equality. However the subject of Spartan or homoiotēs type of equality is not so straightforward. Spartan equality was not considered to be proportional, due to the intra-homoioi equality. Since the homoioi were identified with highest possible level of virtue, the Spartans never intended to differentiate within this group. Accordingly, the real reason behind the identification of Sparta with proportional equality is the hierarchical nature of relations among all groups in Sparta.

Loading...

Loading Preview

Sorry, preview is currently unavailable. You can download the paper by clicking the button above.

References (48)

  1. See Vernant, Јean Pierre, «The Individual within the City-State», in: Zeitlin, Froma I. (ed.), Mortal and Immortals. Collected Essays, Princeton, «Princeton University Press», 1991, p. 319-320; Raaflaub, Kurt A., «Equalities and Inequalities in Athenian Democracy», in: Ober, Josiah -Hedrick, Charles (eds.), Dēmokratia: A Conversation on Democracies, Ancient and Modern, Princeton, «Princeton University Press», 1996, p. 151-153.
  2. See Hölkeskamp, Karl Joachim, Schiedsrichter, Gesetzgeber und Gesetzgebung im archaischen Griechenland, Stuttgart, «Steiner», 1999, p. 87-95, 270-272, 282-283; cf. U. Walter, Polis, 1993, p. 62-65, 69-88.
  3. See Ulf, Christoph, Die homerische Gesellschaft: Materialien zur analytischen Beschreibung und Lokalisierung, München, «C.H. Beck», 1990, p. 1-49.
  4. See Chr. Ulf, Die homerische Gesellschaft, 1990, p. 213-214, 223-231.
  5. See K. A. Raaflaub, «Equalities and Inequalities», 1996, p. 151-153.
  6. See Raaflaub, Kurt A. -Wallace, Robert W., «"People's Power" and Egalitarian Trends in Archaic Greece», in: Raaflaub, Kurt A. -Ober, Josiah -Wallace, Robert W. (eds.), Origins of Democracy in Ancient Greece, Berkeley/Los Angeles/London, «University of California Press 2007, p. 25-28.
  7. Hom. Il. 2.211-270; see K. A. Raaflaub -R. W. Wallace, "People's Power", 2007, p. 28-30.
  8. See Robinson, Eric W., The First Democracies. Early Popular Government Outside Athens, Stuttgart, «Steiner», 1997, p. 127-130. The notion "pre-or proto-democracies" was introduced by K. A. Raaflaub and R. W. Wallace ("People's Power", 2007, p. 43).
  9. See E. W. Robinson, Democracy, 2011, p. 182-183, 191-192, 199, 207.
  10. Hdt. 5.66, 69.2, 78; 6.131.1; Arist. Ath. Pol. 20.1, 21.1-4, 22.1; Pol. 1319 b 20-23; cf. Ostwald, M., From Popular Sovereignty to the Sovereignty of Law: Law, Society, and Politics in Fifth-Century Athens, Berkeley/Los Angeles, «University of California Press», 1986, p. 15-19;
  11. Bleicken, Jochen, Die athenische Demokratie, Paderborn, «Schöningh», [1986], 4 1995, p. 42-47; Raaflaub, Kurt A., «The Breakthrough of Dēmokratia in Mid-Fifth Century
  12. Athens», in: Raaflaub, Kurt A. -Ober, Josiah -Wallace, Robert W. (eds.), Origins of Democracy in Ancient Greece, Berkeley/Los Angeles/London, «University of California Press 2007, p. 105-150. For the view that democracy was established as early as Cleisthenes see Ober, Josiah, «"I Besieged That Man": Democracy's Revolutionary Start», in: Raaflaub, Kurt A. -Ober, Josiah -Wallace, Robert W. (eds.), Origins of Democracy in Ancient Greece, Berkeley/Los Angeles/London, « University of California Press», 2007, p. 83-101;
  13. Cartledge, Paul, «Democracy, Origins of: Contribution to a Debate», in: Raaflaub, Kurt A. -Ober, Josiah -Wallace, Robert W. (eds.), Origins of Democracy in Ancient Greece, Berkeley/Los Angeles/London, «University of California Press», 2007, p. 155-167, esp. 164-165.
  14. J. Bleicken, Demokratie, 1995, p. 43-6; Hansen, Mogens Herman, The Athenian Democracy in the Age of Demosthenes: Structure, Principles, and Ideology, Oxford/Cambridge (Mass.), «Blackwell Publishers», 1991, p. 49;
  15. Welwei, Karl Wilhelm, Das klassische Athen: Demokratie und Machtpolitik im 5.und 4. Jahrhundert, Darmstadt, «WBG», 1999, p. 15-21.
  16. Four Hundred/Five Thousand (Arist. Ath. Pol 29.5; Thuc. 8.65.1-66.1, 67.3, 89.2-3, 92.11, 97.1; esp. 8.89.2, 92.11). Thirty/Three Thousand (Arist. Ath. Pol. 36; Xen. Hell., 2.3.17-20, 41-3, 48; esp. Arist. Ath. Pol. 36.2; Xen. Hell., 2.3.19, 48).
  17. Arist. Pol. III, 5, 1279 b 20 -1280a7; IV, 3, 1290 a 30 -1290 b 3; IV, 10, 1297 b 25-28.
  18. See Chr. Meier, Discovery of Politics, 1990, p. 167-168;
  19. P. Cartledge, Comparatively Equal, 1996, p. 178-180.
  20. Arist. Pol. III, 5, 1280 а 8-24; III, 8, 1284 a 15-23;
  21. VII, 3, 1325 b 8-10; see also Eur. Hec. 306-308;
  22. Pl. Rep. VIII, 558c; Grg. 483c; Prt. 337a; Isoc. 2.14; 3.14; 7.21-22; Xen. Cyr. 2.2.18.
  23. Arist. Pol. V, 7, 1308 а 4-20; see also Isoc. 3.15.
  24. Ath. 695a-b; see also Hdt. 3.142.3; cf. de Libero, Loretana, Die archaische Tyrannis, Stuttgart, «Steiner», 1996, p. 391-393, 398-400; Raaflaub, Kurt A., The Discovery of Freedom in Ancient Greece, Chicago, «University of Chicago Press», 2004, p. 91-95.
  25. Thuc. 6.38.5-39.1; cf. Dalfen, Jochen, «Gorgias: Übersetzung und Kommentar», in: Heitsch, Ernst -Müller, Carl Werner, (eds.), Platon Werke: Übersetzung und Kommentar, vol. VI.3, Göttingen, «Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht», 2004, p. 325-326.
  26. 78.2-3; 6.38.5; Isoc. 7.20; Pl. Rep. VIII, 561 d-e; 563b; cf. Eder, Walter, «Aristocrats and the Coming of Democracy», in: Morris, Ian -Raaflaub, Kurt A. (eds.), Democracy 2500? Questions and Challenges, Dubuque (Iowa), «Kendall/Hunt», 1998, p. 105-137;
  27. E. Stein-Hölkeskamp, Adelskultur, 1989, p. 177, 205-230, 234; K. A. Raaflaub, Discovery of Freedom, 2004, p. 99-100.
  28. 78.2-3, esp. 3.62.3-4; see also Lys. 2.18-9; cf. Jordović, Ivan, «Did the ancient Greeks have knowledge of collective tyranny?», Balcanica, 36, 2006, p. 17-33.
  29. Cf. Arist. Pol. IV, 10, 1287 a 9-23;
  30. V, 7, 1308a11-24; see also Vlastos, Gregory, «Isonomia politikē», in: Mau, Jürgen -Schmidt Ernst G. (eds.), ISONOMIA. Studien zur Gleichheitsvorstellung im griechischen Denken, Berlin/Amsterdam, «Akademie/A.M. Hackertt», [1964], 2 1971, p. 13-17; Chr. Meier, Discovery of Politics, 1990, p. 171.
  31. J. Bleicken, Demokratie, 1995, p. 66-67.
  32. Ar. Vesp. 548-630; Xen. Ath. Pol. 1.18; Thuc. 2.37.3; Arist. Ath. Pol. 9.1, 41.2; Pol. IV, 4, 1292 a 4-13; Dem. 21.223; 24.37. Claims of this kind are voiced by Callicles in Plato's Gorgias and Alcibiades in Xenophons' Memorabilia (Pl. Grg. 483b-c; Xen. Mem. 1.2.42-5, see also Dem. 24.68, 118, 143, 148, 152-153, 171, 204, 217- 218); cf. Gehrke, Hans Joachim, «Der Nomosbegriff der Polis», in: Behrends, Okko -Sellert, Wolfgang (eds.), Nomos und Gesetz: Ursprünge und Wirkungen des griechischen Gesetzesdenkens, Abh. Akad. Göttingen, Phil-hist. Klasse 3, 209, Göttingen, «Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht», 1995, p. 28-31.
  33. See Chr. Meier, Discovery of Politics, 1990, p. 53-54, 136-154, 164-8 esp. 143-148, 164-168; Humprehys, Sarah C., «Public and Private Interests in Classical Athens», CJ, 73, 1977/78, p. 99, 103; Raaflaub, K. A., «Oligarchy and the Concept of the 'Free Citizen' in Late Fifth-Century Athens», PTh, 11, 1983, p. 535; Farrar, Cynthia, The Origins of Democratic Thinking. The Invention of Politics in Classical Athens, Cambridge, «Cambridge University Press», 1988, 101; Hölkeskamp, Karl Joachim, «Parteiungen und politische Willensbildung. Perikles und Thukydides, Sohn des Melesias», HZ, 267, 1998, p. 20-23.
  34. Thuc. 2.37; see also 2.60.2-4; Arist. Pol. VI, 2, 1319 b 20-27; cf. Kakridis, Johannes Theoph., Der thukydideische Epitaphios. Ein stilistischer Kommentar, München, «C.H. Beck», 1961, 30-32; Loraux Nicole, The Inven¬tion of Athens. The Funeral Oration in the Classical City, Cambridge (Mass.)/London, «Harvard University Press», 1986, p. 109, 180, 184.
  35. Thuc. 2.60.2-4, 61.2, 4, 62.3, 63. The view that sea power (thalassocracy) is one of the pillars of the rule of the people developed relatively early, as Pseudo-Xenophon confirms (Xen. Ath. Pol. 1.2). For the identification of the Athenian archē with tyranny see also Schuller, Wolfgang, Die Stadt als Tyrann -Athens Herrschaft über seine Bundesgenossen, Konstanz, «Walter de Gruyter», 1978, 10-12. For dating of the polis tyrannos metaphor see Raaflaub, Kurt A., «Polis Tyrannos: Zur Entstehung einer politischen Metapher», in: Bowersock, Glen W. - Bruckert, Walter -Putnam Michael C. J. (eds.), Arktouros, Hellenic Studies presented to Bernard M. W. Knox on the occasion of his 65th birthday, Berlin/New York 1979, «Walter de Gruyter», p. 245, 251. Concerning the term polypragmosynē, which not only stands for the rule of the people, but also Athens imperialistic policy, see Ehrenberg, Victor, «Polypragmosyne: A Study in Greek Politics», JHS, 67, 1947, p. 46-67; Carter, Laurence B., The Quiet Athenian, Oxford, «Clarendon Press», 1986, p. 163-173.
  36. For the notion freedom to do what one pleases in a democratic constitution see the chapter from Bernard Collette- Dučić in this volume.
  37. Thuc. 2.37.3; see also 3.37.3-5; 6.38.5; Pl. Prt. 322c-323a, 325a-c, 326e-327d, esp. 322d, 327c-d; cf. H.-J. Gehrke, Nomosbegriff der Polis, 1995, p. 29; Hornblower, Simon, A Commentary on Thucydides, Vol. I: Books I- III, Oxford, «Oxford University Press» 1991, p. 301-302.
  38. Xen. Ath. Pol. 1.5-10.
  39. See Cartledge, Paul, Sparta and Lakonia. A Regional History 1300 to 362 BC, London/New York, «Routledge», [1979], 2 2002, p. 138-68.
  40. See Thommen, Lukas, LAKEDAIMON POLITEIA: Die Entstehung der spartanischen Verfassung, Stuttgart, «Steiner», 1996, p. 135-137;
  41. Link, Stefan, Das frühe Sparta. Untersuchungen zur spartanischen Staatsbildung im 7. und 6. Jahrhundert v. Chr., St. Katharinen, «Scripta Mercutarae», 2000, p. 116; Meier, Mischa, «Wann entstand das Homoios-Ideal in Sparta?», in: Luther, Andreas -Meier, Mischa -Thommen, Lukas (eds.), Das Frühe Sparta, Stuttgart, «Steiner», 2006, p. 113-122.
  42. Xen. Lac. 8.5; see Millender, Ellen Greenstein, «Nomos Despotēs: Spartan Obedience and Athenian Lawfulness in Fifth-Century Thought», in: Gormann, Vanessa B. -Robinson Eric W. (eds.), OIKISTES: Studies in Constitutions, Colonies, and Military Power in the Ancient World. Offered in Honour of A. J. Graham, Leiden, «Brill», 2002, p. 39-41, 44-45.
  43. Xen. Lac. 10.7; see also 10.4; cf. Rebenich, Stefan, Xenophon: Die Verfassung der Spartaner, Herausgegeben, übersetzt und erläutert von Stefan Rebenich, Darmstadt, «WBG», 1998, p. 91-93, 120-121.
  44. Hansen, Mogens Herman, Was Sparta a Normal or an Exceptional Polis?», in: Hodkinson, Stephen (ed.), Sparta: Comparative Approaches, Swansea, «The Classical Press of Wales», 2009, p. 397-398; Hansen, Mogens Herman - Hodkinson, Stephen, «Spartan Exceptionalism? Continuing the Debate», in: Hodkinson, Stephen (ed.), Sparta: Comparative Approaches, Swansea, «The Classical Press of Wales», 2009, p. 479.
  45. Hodkinson, Stephen, «Was Sparta an Exceptional Polis?», in: Id. (ed.), Sparta: Comparative Approaches, Swansea, «The Classical Press of Wales», 2009, p. 450, 454, 457; M. H. Hansen -S. Hodkinson, Spartan Exceptionalism, 2009, p. 489-491.
  46. See M. H. Hansen, Polis and City-State, 1998, p. 84-86; Id., Sparta, 2009, p. 396-397; S. Hodkinson, Was Sparta, 2009, p. 442, 445, 450-451, 456-457;
  47. M. H. Hansen -S. Hodkinson, Spartan Exceptionalism, 2009, p. 475-479, 484-488.
  48. See Chr. Meier, Discovery of Politics, 1990, p. 153.