Phenomenon of Christian Art Through the Prism of Ancient Russian Art (original) (raw)
Related papers
This text tries to draw a general view of the development of the Christian Orthodox art in the 16 th and 17 th centuries. The author represents in brief the main monuments and artists during the above period on the Balkans as well as the interactions between different cultures in historical context. Special interest is given to the art appeared on Mount Athos and the role of Patriarchate of Constantinople as a political and spiritual factor in the Ottoman empire and their influence in the Trans-Danubian principalities. Most of the existing bibliography on this subject is presented and analyzed. In his critical reading of the available publication E. Moutafov suggests for instance that it is more accurate to speak about Cretan painters on Mount Athos, rather than about the presence of a Cretan school in the artistic processes there. On the hand, when
The Mystery of the Bulgarian Church Paintings Touching God; book presentation by prof. Valeria Fol
This book is the first attempt ever made to present the Bulgarian church paintings in their original theological context as well as in the broader comparative perspective of the iconography characteristic of the East and the West The chosen approach, which seeks to construe the religious topics and their respective iconographic interpretations in their logical interconnection, prevents fragmentation which is otherwise inevitable if emphasis is laid on individual images, scenes, festive cycles, eras or regions. The comparison, both diachronic and synchronic, allows for displaying, with maximum clarity, the common traits in the Christian art in general, the specific traits of the Orthodox iconography – which sphere includes rarely studied traditions such as the Ethiopian, Syrian, Romanian, Georgian and Armenian – and the unique Bulgarian features in the depiction of certain Biblical stories, theological concepts or apocryphal (and indeed, heretical) topics. The main instrument through...
This paper is an attempt to highlight and reflect on several interrelated issues that seem to be very important in terms of working out a relevant theological approach to the wide variety of artistic expression, particularly as far as theoretical aesthetics is concerned. I shall focus on some most characteristic ideas developed in 20 th century Russian religious philosophy that may appear to be significant not only for the Orthodox tradition of spirituality and thought in which they are rooted, but for other Christian traditions as well. As for the Russian Orthodoxy, it should be pointed out from the very outset that the relationships between theology and art have always been rather uneasy, and in fact confined to the theology of church arts, icons in particular. Based on the teachings of the Saint Fathers, the Russian Orthodox tradition has always been extremely rich in artistic creativity within the sphere of church arts; however, up to the present moment it has been quite reluctant in acknowledging deep spiritual dimensions of secular arts. There were, of course, many attempts towards religious evaluation of literature, painting, music or poetry, but the gap between " sacred " and " secular " art has always been present and articulated by the Church. I would not say, however, that it is typical of the tradition as such; rather, it was historically and, in some cases, spiritually determined, inasmuch as the primary concern of the Church is to keep people away from the temptations of the flawed world. The tradition, however dominated by certain prescribed norms or rules, is an " open system " , and its evolution is characterized by a dialectic of the canonical and the heuristic principles, the static and the dynamic. In Russia, it was not until the beginning of the 20 th century that the theoretical heritage of Orthodox iconology started being philosophically and aesthetically deepened and in some ways reassessed in the works of a number of prominent thinkers, so that it became possible to consider the challenge of overcoming the traditional gap between " religious " and " non-religious " spheres of creativity by means of developing a fundamental theoretical basis for the interpretation of art. In the present-day Russia, with the growing interest in theological evaluation of art and literature, this is one of the most crucial issues, as well as it has been in the West. The following observations, though covering just a few general and purely theoretical points, might provide, I hope, an outline of what could be called iconological thought in Russian religious aesthetics, how I view it, both rooted in and different (in terms of subject and treatment) from what is known as the theology of Icon. 1. Image/Icon as a Category of Religious Consciousness This is something that would, perhaps, seem quite natural to Western thought, whereas, for some reason, it is not a common way of reflecting upon the icon in Russia. In fact, the image has always been one of the central categories of Orthodox religious consciousness, a category linking together theology, aesthetics and anthropology. The concept of the Divine image that constituted the basis of understanding personal relationship between God and man was, at the same time, the major idea underlying patristic iconology: an icon is always an expression of the Divine image as an ontological reality present in human nature. However, the question arises: how is such an expression possible? From the very beginning, the image (εικων) has, therefore, two inseparable dimensions: ontological and epistemological, i.e. the nature of the image as revelation of the Divine is accounted for by the fact that it is an immanent structure, or category, of consciousness; and vice versa: cognition and experience of the Divine through the image is possible only because its ontological nature is asserted. It was precisely the categorical aspect of the image that Fr. Pavel Florensky, one of the greatest Russian religious thinkers, stressed in his
Roczniki Humanistyczne, 2019
Vladimir the Great's Baptism of Rus' in 988 has opened a qualitatively new chapter in the history of the Eastern Slavonic state; this event accelerated the Christianisation of Old Rus' which took on a dual character: symbolic and practical. The symbolic aspect has crowned Rus' long-term multilayered contacts with Christianity, while the practical one has normalized relations with the Byzantine Empire and initiated the ripening of an Eastern Slavonic way of religious feeling. The adaptation to Christianity among different strata went at different speeds according to their literacy, habits, and temper. Elite, unlike the commons, was the most receptive to changes. The cultural and social changes that have reached the Old Rus' under the influence of Christianity differed from those that had taken place in the Roman Empire in their kind, scope and pace. Constantinople and Rome have had centuries of philosophical, political and artistic tradition, while Kiev relied among other on the tradition of solar and ancestral cults, and on the spread of fortified towns. In Constantinople and Rome the dissonance between pagan and Christian aesthetics played into the hands of the pagan culture, while in Kiev the cultural gap was so extensive that it rendered any comparison point
The paper aims to introduce an art historical phenomenon, which appears in Russia in the beginning of the 20th century. The early years present plurality of art movements in Russian and in Europe. Efforts have been made to constitute a true art of Russia. To do so, the traditional/religious art and folk art, mainly of the peasants, were reconsidered. The accumulation and study of works of folk art already began by the mid-19th century. By this time, an increasing interest had emerged concerning icons and folkloric elements, found in arts and crafts. Kasimir Malevich, Marc Chagall, Vladimir Tatlin are among the leading figures who vigorously defended a re-investigation of these art forms. They elaborated genuine features of icon painting and adapted to their contemporary art conceptions and compositions. Accordingly these leading figures are to be mentioned in brief. Russian Avant-garde artists, Constructivists, Suprematists with their non-objective art show re-percussions of traditional particularly religious art modelled after the Byzantine tradition.
The Esoteric Christianity and Artistic Language of Alexander Ivanov
A. Simsky. The Esoteric Christianity and Artistic Language of Alexander Ivanov // History of Art and Rejected Knowledge: From the Hermetic Tradition to the 21st Century. Proceedings ..., p. 206-217, 2018
Alexander Ivanov (1806–1858) was a Russian academic artist who spent the larger part of his career in Rome working on a large-scale canvas entitled “The appearance of the Messiah”. Before embarking on this endeavor, however, he first had to complete a smaller painting, a representation of “Noli me tangere” (1835), which was received with great acclaim in Saint Petersburg. During the last decade of his life he started a major project entirely of his own, namely a large set of sketches for murals which covered all the important episodes of the Gospel, together with theologically linked Old Testament stories. These sketches, which evinced a novel artistic language, are collectively referred to as the Biblical Studies. In this paper, I shall put forward an account of Ivanov’s spiritual journey, which led him to the creation of this vibrant epic, filled with light and magic.
The Icon of Resurrection: the Transformations in the Russian Art of the 16 th-17 th Centuries
The article deals with the problem of Easter iconography. The changes that have taken place in the Russian art of the 16 th-17 th centuries are examinated. During this time, new samples for Russian icon painters have appeared. These are Western European engravings and Bibles with illustrations. The images from there are borrowed by Russian artists. This is how an engraving is copied from the cycle of illustrations of the Apostolic Creed. This creed is different from the Orthodox one. The fifth illustration includes dogma, that is not named in the Orthodox creed. There are different stages of image change. They correspond to the understanding of engraving by Russian icon painters. Firstly, the icon painters interpret the engraving and arrange the images differently from the composition of the engraving. Secondly, they create icons as an exact copy of the engraving. Finally, they create a multi-figure image with a central dominant. This new image is associated in culture with the ancient image of Anastasis, or rather, it is defined as its detailed version. Therefore, the ancient icon of Anastasis is connected with a new context. This makes it difficult both to understand the icon and the history of the "Descent into Hell" image. Only by taking into account the transformation of the icon can we talk about the meaning of the ancient image.
About Conservation and Innovation in Orthodox Ecclesial Art
2009
History is often hidden by appearances as well as by insignificant details of reality, of the present. That’s why a thorough research of every ‘stone’ of the history’s ‘wall’ is always necessary, in order to reveal the real cultural values behind the shadowed corners. The discovery of the 18 Century Image of the ‘Virgin Mary Hodighitria’, hidden beneath another religious image, but without any style (probably from the beginning of 20 century), represents an example of the above. In another hypostasis, a 19 century icon of ‘Oranta Virgin Mary’ is an edificatory example of the evolution and the influences the religious painting has supported, by adding a human reflection to Virgin Mary and Jesus faces. We face a optimistic ‘drop’ of human being, magisterially mixed with the sacred being, that came to life by the inspired and creational gesture of the icon painter. In the first case we find an intentional hiding of a cultural value from some dangers, or it can be purely ignorance. In t...