Analysis of Discourses and Rhetoric in European Migration Politics full chapter proofs (original) (raw)
Related papers
Critical Discourse Studies (CDS) is a transdisciplinary family of theoretical and methodological approaches, focusing on the analysis and critique of discursive practices in relation to broader ideological processes, as well as the material conditions that shape and are shaped by them (see Wodak and Meyer, 2016; Flowerdew and Richardson, 2017). A CDS approach can be seen as an extension of the Critical Linguistics framework (Fowler et al., 1979; Kress and Hodge, 1979) that developed in and out of Western European contexts. The main premise of the analyses developed from this perspective considers language not as a neutral descriptor of reality, but as an important instrument in the structuring of power relations in societies. Consequently, CDS strives to uncover how the legitimation of particular control mechanisms occurs, among others, through specific linguistic practices. In spite of its Western European core, and due to its decidedly problem- oriented nature, as well as the constant refinement and broadening of its analytical tools, CDS has progressively become appealing to the larger European continent, as well as to other Western and non- Western contexts such as the US, Australia, or China (Shi- Xu, 1999; Tracy et al., 2011).
The Discourses and Politics of Migration in Europe
2013
Migration is one of the key issues in contemporary European politics and society, placing high on the political agenda in local, national and transnational political contexts, and widely debated in the media. All European states must grapple with the challenges posed when people move across borders. However, little is known about the relationship between the construction and elaboration of political discourse and its impact on institutions and actors associated with immigration, as well as the lives and everyday realities of frequently vulnerable migrant populations. This book engages with politics and political discourse that relate to and qualify immigration in Europe. It brings together empirical analysis of immigration both topically and contextually, and interprets such empirical evidence with the use of policy and discursive analyses as methodological tools. Thematically, this volume focuses on how discourse and politics operate in issue areas as varied as immigrant integration and multi-level governance, Roma immigration and their respective securitization, the uses of language in determination of asylum applications, gendered immigrants the in informal economy, public perceptions of integration, economic interests and economic nationalism stimulating immigration choices, ideology and entry policies, asylum processes and the institutional evolution of immigration systems. These issues are analyzed with empirical evidence investigating the discursive formulation of immigration in political contexts such as the Netherlands, France, United Kingdom, Turkey, Switzerland, Scandinavian states, and Poland. Overall, this volume constitutes a unique effort to elevate the underlying but implicit discursive frames that affect politics of immigration, and that inevitably have institutional, legal, and policy implications. Finally, we offer a portrayal of both the public philosophy that emanates from how political and social actors approach the issue of immigration and politics that affect the functioning of immigration systems as a result.
The Routledge Handbook of the Politics of Migration in Europe
The Routledge Handbook of the Politics of Migration in Europe, 2018
Routledge is an imprint of the Taylor & Francis Group, an informa business © 2019 selection and editorial matter, Agnieszka Weinar, Saskia Bonjour and Lyubov Zhyznomirska; individual chapters, the contributors The right of Agnieszka Weinar, Saskia Bonjour and Lyubov Zhyznomirska to be identified as the authors of the editorial matter, and of the authors for their individual chapters, has been asserted in accordance with sections 77 and 78 of the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988. All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reprinted or reproduced or utilised in any form or by any electronic, mechanical, or other means, now known or hereafter invented, including photocopying and recording, or in any information storage or retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publishers.
Critical perspectives on migration in discourse and communication: An introduction
Studies in Communication Sciences
While these lines were written, Taliban were conquering Afghanistan, establishing a regime of terror in the country, while concurrently provoking a wide conflict in the Western public sphere about responsibilities and consequences of this situation. More specifically, Europe witnesses a racist and xenophobic wave of discourses against a new possible escape of refugees toward Europe; presently such discourses abound in politics and the media. It is more than a truism nowadays that, in crisis-stricken Europe, there is an increasing politicization of migration, which takes place against the background and mutual overlapping of diverse crises. More specifically, migration has become a focal and quite polarizing issue in the European public sphere especially since the numbers of refugees, escaping from conflict territories of the Middle East (e. g., Syria), crossing the Mediterranean, dramatically increased starting in 2014 (Bevelander & Wodak, 2019a). The so-called “refugee crisis,” as ...
2011
While debates on migration policy often revolve around rival values and interests, they also invoke knowledge claims about the causes, dynamics and impacts of migration. Such claims are best conceptualised as 'policy narratives', setting out beliefs about policy problems and appropriate interventions. Narratives are likely to be more successful where they meet three criteria: they are cognitively plausible, dramatically or morally compelling and, importantly, they chime with perceived interests. Increasingly, such narratives are also expected to draw on expert knowledge, although knowledge is often deployed to legitimise particular actors or preferences rather than to enhance the cognitive plausibility of the narrative. The series of articles in this issue explore how narratives are developed, codified, revised and diffused in policy debates and policy-making. We hope that they contribute not just to understanding migration policy, but also to wider debates on the role of ideas and knowledge in public policy.
Public Discourses and Politics on Migration: A Precarious Situation and Dismal Outlook
Zeitschrift für Migrationsforschung / Journal of Migration Research, 2021
Emotions dominating normative frameworks is not new in the making of migration-related policies or in public discourses on migration. However, this matter has entered a different dimension in the age of populism and post-factualism reshuffling the parameters of this issue to a large extent. I will argue in this article that we can find a mixture of developments that consecutively reveals a state of public discourses that is highly precarious and that needs change and counteraction. Instead of retreating into welltrodden policy issues and overtly neglecting the potentiality for a constructive discourse that includes the deliberation on migration realties and migratory processes and its complexities, a vision is needed for new evidencebased, well-informed, yet not technocratic, forms of discourse and a future of reflexive knowledge production.
The political discourse on immigration in southern Europe: a critical analysis
Journal of community & applied social psychology, 2000
This study analyses the political discourse on immigration in Greece\ Italy and Spain\ with a view to highlighting how discourse is organised and\ in particular\ the use of ingroup and outgroup categories in it[ It is hypothesised that talk on immigration involves a re!elaboration of national identity and re!de_nition of the ingroup:nation and outgroup:immigrant rep! resentation[ Moreover\ it is expected that immigrants are represented as Others\ alien to the ingroup and\ therefore\ to be excluded from the host society[ My aim here is to highlight the commonality of identity processes activated in di}erent social!historical contexts and analyse the connection between ingroup!outgroup representations and the speci_c historical legacy and socio!economic reality of a given country[ Greece\ Italy and Spain have been selected as a suitable set of case studies because they have recently been transformed from senders to hosts of migrants[ The section that follows describes brie~y the size of the immigration phenomenon in each country and the public policies adopted[ The second section discusses the ingroup! outgroup dynamics activated in immigration discourse from a sociological and a social psycho! logical perspective[ The third section concentrates on the analysis of political discourse\ namely interviews with non!governmental organisations\ trade union representatives and public admin! istration employees in Athens\ Rome and Madrid[ The methodology used is that of qualitative discourse analysis[ Findings are discussed under the light of sociological and social psycho! logical research on the issue[
Policies and Politics of Migration towards the European Elections
Rome, IAI, December 2018, 12 p. (Documenti IAI ; 18|26), 2018
On 6 December 2018, Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung Rome (FES) and Istituto Affari Internazionali (IAI) co-organized the conference “External Borders and Internal Divisions of Europe: Policies and Politics of Migration” to foster debate on European migration and asylum governance by approaching it both as a policy issue and a political question. While the scale of migratory flows is no longer the main problem, countries at the Southern external borders continue facing different policy challenges. The lack of political will and continuing tensions among the member states stand out as the main obstacles blocking substantial policy reform at the European level. This context also provides fertile ground for further polarization of the political debate between the two extreme positions of open versus closed borders, highlighting the need for more balanced and neutral narratives on migration in the run up to the European elections.