Positive and negative impact of punishment in transitional societies (original) (raw)
Related papers
THE MISUSE OF THE LUSTRATION PROCESSES IN THE POST-COMMUNIST TRANSITIONS IN EUROPE
Iustinianus Law Review Special Issue – Conference Proceedings (2019), 2019
The fall of the Berlin Wall opened the gate to democracy for the post-communist countries in Europe. However, the road towards democracy in all post-communist countries in Europe proved to be very difficult. One of the main questions on the road towards democracy in these countries was the question what to do with the problematic communist totalitarian past: to forgive and forget or to punish and remember. Most of the post communist countries in Europe decided to punish and remember their communist past. That is why 14 post-communist countries in Europe decided to implement the process of lustration in order to confront this communist past. Taking that into consideration, we can say that the lustration processes were frequently used in the process of facing the communist past in Europe. However, very often in theory is stressed out that the process of lustration is one the most controversial mechanism of transitional justice. Many authors warn that lustration hides the danger of political discredit and revenge. These types of claims during the post-communist transition have become reality in a several post-communist countries in Europe (Albania, Poland, Macedonia). In these post-communist countries the process of lustration was used as a weapon in the hands of the ruling political elites against their political opponents, a weapon that needed to strengthen the position of the ruling political parties and marginalize their political opponents. At the end, the process of lustration has had very negative impact at the democratic consolidation of these countries instead of a positive one. That is why the subject of this paper will be the way the lustration processes were misused in the post-communist countries in Europe. The main methods that are used are the following: method of analysis, historical, normative and political method. The overall conclusion is that the process of lustration was very often misused by creating lustration laws that covered positions in the private sector too, by creating lustration laws that covered periods after the fall of the communist regimes and by creating lustration laws that violated the basic human rights of lustrated individuals (the right to a fair trial, the right to respect of private and family life etc) Key words: politics, political system, democracy, transition, lustration, post-communist countries.
Explaining lustration in Central Europe: a ‘post-communist politics’ approach
Democratization, 2005
JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact support@jstor.org. This content downloaded from 139. 184.192.236 on Tue,
Lustration laws, which discharge the influence of old power structures upon entering democracies, are considered the most controversial measure of transitional justice. This article suggests that initial examinations of lustrations have often overlooked the tremendous challenges faced by new democracies. It identifies the motives behind the approval of two distinctive lustration laws in the Czech Republic and Poland, examines their capacity to meet their objectives, and determines the factors that influence their performance. The comparison of the Czech semi-renibutive model with the Polish semi-reconciliatory model suggests the relative success of the fonner within a few years following its approval. It concludes that a certain lustration model might be significant for democratic consolidation in other transitional countries.
2009
Labour Organization have explored possible information problems, due process violations, employment discrimination issues, and bureaucratic loyalty concerns within the context of lustration. Three findings emerge from their legal rulings. First, contrary to popular notions, international legal bodies are not antilustration. The institutions are engaging with questions regarding the fair implementation, not the legality, of lustration laws. Second, the prioritizing of justice concerns during the transition efforts is highlighted as a way to lay a strong democratic foundation. Third, the organizations have emphasized the importance of placing rule of law in historical context, thereby situating post-Communist societies within other posttotalitarian regime-building narratives.
Late lustration programmes in Romania and Poland: supporting or undermining democratic transitions?
Democratization, 2009
In 2006, Poland and Romania embarked on renewed lustration programmes. These late lustration policies expanded the scope and transparency measures associated with lustration as a form of transitional justice. While early lustration measures targeted political elites, late lustration policies include public and private sector positions, such as journalists, academics, business leaders, and others in 'positions of public trust'. Given the legal controversy and moral complexity surrounding lustration, why lustrate so late in the post-communist transition and why expand the policies? The dominant explanation is that lustration is a tool of party politics and is a threat to democratic consolidation. However, the late lustration programmes do not fit this hypothesis neatly. The new laws have been restructured and packaged with other reform programmes, specifically anticorruption programmes. Late lustration has evolved to include economic and social, as well as political concerns. As such, some post-communist governments in Central and Eastern Europe appear to be trying to use lustration as a way to further the democratic transitions by addressing remaining public concerns about corruption, distrust, and inequality.
Lustration (administrative justice) and closure in post-communist East Central Europe
International Journal, 2012
This article discusses the various dimensions of East Central Europe's closure with the communist past, and then assesses the impact of transitional justice measures in the closure with communism. Special attention is paid to the so called 'lustration', which in the view of the author performs important functions in transitions to democratic regimes, related to the reconstruction of a moral and rational community, and to the closure with the communist past. The article shows that the failures and controversies surrounding 'lustration' were due to its radical potential of reconstruction of a moral–rational democratic community, and also to specific socio–political factors of the post–communist ECE. What specific features of ECE post–communist transitions and of lustration conducted to the recurrence of debates related to the communist past is a question that has not been addressed heretofore, despite a fairly well–developed literature on post–communist administrative justice.