THE CAMOUFLAGED TA'AM ("MOTIVE"): REDEMPTIVE IMPLICATIONS OF RABBINIC THEURGY* Shai Cherry (original) (raw)
Related papers
The Attenuation of God in Modern Jewish Thought
Melilah: Manchester Journal of Jewish Studies (1759-1953)
Critical Bible scholarship reveals much diversity in ancient Israelite notions of God, but whatever the theology, the Bible rarely leaves room for doubt that God is alive, alert, vigorous and righteous; even Job, despite his sense of injustice, does not doubt that ultimately God is just, and is in control of events. Modern times have seen a change of attitude, not simply on account of the apparent injustice in the world, but more fundamentally because the successes of science have made God redundant as an explanation for natural phenomena. Twentieth-century Jewish thinkers such as Mordecai M. Kaplan have sought to replace God by social constructs, while those who retain traditional God-talk range from Heschel, whose "anthropopathic God" shares human emotion, to Eliezer Berkovits ("the hidden God"), and from J. D. Soloveitchik (the God of halakha) to Richard Rubenstein (the non-interventionist God) and David Blumenthal (God as abusing parent). In this paper I shall review some of the main theories, while enquiring whether their proponents have anything in common with ancient and mediaeval believers, or whether they have subverted the older God-language, in some cases attenuating the concept of God to the point of atheism. The Bible and its Aftermath Broadly speaking-the dividing lines are not sharp-talk about God has moved ("shifted") through three phases, or models ("paradigms"):
Journal of Jewish Ethics, 2023
This article surveys Abraham Joshua Heschel’s writings on Jewish law in order to determine his influences and interlocutors, as well as to evaluate whether his work can serve the needs of those engaged in constructive Jewish thought today. Heschel’s thinking on Jewish law is shaped both by the Kantian critique of Judaism as well as by debates with Reform and Orthodox leaders of his own day. This article concludes that the vagueness in Heschel’s theology of halakhah, as well as a tendency to force halakhic questions into a simple framework of leniency and stringency, limits its usefulness for contemporary Jewish theology.
From the Temple to the Law: Rabbinic Judaism as a Resilient Religion
"Resilient Religion", European Association for the Study of Religions (EASR) Annual Conference, 2021
The origins of Rabbinic Judaism are rooted in a historical moment of struggle against the Roman Empire that ended up with the First Jewish War (66-73 C.E.) and the destruction of the Temple of Jerusalem (70 C.E.). However, these circumstances had a positive consequence: An open space for the blooming of heterodoxy, the chance for minority groups to develop their thoughts and beliefs without the restraining framework of the orthodox sacrificial cult. One of those minority groups grew stronger and fully arose in the 4th century C.E. as Rabbinic Judaism, and eventually replaced the authority of the Temple cult, its institutions and hierarchies, with a new kind of authority: the centrality of the text. We will focus on two main features of this change through an analysis of rabbinic literary production from the point of view of Philosophical Hermeneutics. On one hand, the text is no longer considered as telling the sacred story of the intervention of God in history, instead it is sacred itself, sacred law that must be applied through changing times. On the other hand, even though fixed sacred scripture cannot be amended, within the core of Rabbinic Judaism there is an aim to keep divine revelation alive throughout the interpretation of scripture and its excedent of meaning. Provided that scripture contains all the truth of the universe, it is necessary to squeeze out each and every possibility of meaning contained in it. Thus, this shift to textuality opens the possibility of constant adaptation to changing circumstances.