Using Different Surfactants to Increase Oil Recovery of Rumaila Field (Experimental Work (original) (raw)
Related papers
Surfactant flooding characteristics of dodecyl alkyl sulfate for enhanced oil recovery
Journal of Industrial and Engineering Chemistry, 2014
Surfactant-enhanced oil recovery is a type of enhanced oil recovery (EOR), a method to produce residual oil by injecting surfactant solution into the reservoir. The application of surfactant EOR requires knowledge of the phase behavior for more efficient production of residual oil. In this study, the relationship between dodecyl alkyl sulfate and some specific crude oils was examined through phase behavior test. It was found that the branched surfactant was more effective than the linear surfactant. The system was stable at salinities The gravity drainage flooding test (GDFT) was performed to determine the potential of dodecyl alkyl sulfate to produce residual oil in porous media. It was found that the solution could be flooded at temperatures of 60 °C or higher. In the core flooding test, injecting one pore volume of 2 wt% surfactant solution with 3 wt% salinity produced 26.6% more oil after water flood. With the addition of only 0.01 wt% co-surfactant, oil production increased by ...
Experimental study of combined low salinity and surfactant flooding effect on oil recovery
Oil & Gas Science and Technology – Revue d’IFP Energies nouvelles
A new generation improved oil recovery methods comes from combining techniques to make the overall process of oil recovery more efficient. One of the most promising methods is combined Low Salinity Surfactant (LSS) flooding. Low salinity brine injection has proven by numerous laboratory core flood experiments to give a moderate increase in oil recovery. Current research shows that this method may be further enhanced by introduction of surfactants optimized for lowsal environment by reducing the interfacial tension. Researchers have suggested different mechanisms in the literature such as pH variation, fines migration, multi-component ionic exchange, interfacial tension reduction and wettability alteration for improved oil recovery during lowsal injection. In this study, surfactant solubility in lowsal brine was examined by bottle test experiments. A series of core displacement experiments was conducted on nine crude oil aged Berea core plugs that were designed to determine the impac...
Laboratory study of salinity and surfactant concentration effects on oil recovery
MATEC Web of Conferences, 2017
This paper perfoms a discussion of the result from two laboratory tests of surfactant injection. The first test is focused on the influence of salinity that varies between 5000 ppm-9000 ppm with a concentration of 1% surfactant to the value of density, viscosity, interfacial tension, and Recovery Factor. The second test is performing the influence of surfactant concentration that varies between 0.1%-1% with a value of 5000 ppm salinity to the value of residual oil saturation, density, viscosity, and interfacial tension. The result of the first test shows that along with the increase of salinity levels, the increase in viscosity and density will occured as well. However, variations in salinity does not affect to the value of interfacial tension. Meanwhile, on Recovery Factor testing, the Recovery Factor optimal value of 61.53% was obtained when the salinity levels 6,000 ppm. The result of the second test showed that the addition of surfactant concentration lead to a decrease in the residual oil saturation and interfacial tension, but it may cause an increase in density and viscosity.
In this research, effect of temperature, pressure, salinity, surfactant concentration, and surfactant type on interfacial tension (IFT) and critical micelle concentration of Saudi Arabian crude oil and various aqueous phases were investigated. The temperature ranged from ambient condition to 90°C, and the pressures were varied from atmospheric to 4,000 psi (27.58 MPa). Surfactant solutions were prepared using several aqueous phases, i.e., purified water, 10% brine consisting of 100% NaCl, 10% brine consisting of 95% NaCl and 5% CaCl 2 , and 10% brine consisting of 83% NaCl and 17% CaCl 2. Out of 13 commercial surfactants, only three surfactants showed good solubility in pure water and brine. Those are Zonyl FSE Fluorosurfactant®, Triton X-100®, and Triton X-405®. Therefore, they were investigated thoroughly by measuring their efficiency in reducing the crude oil-aqueous phase IFT. Based on this screening process, laboratory surfactant flooding experiments for crude oil recovery were conducted using Triton X-405 and Triton X-100. The chemical flood was made at both original oil in place and at residual oil in place subsequent to conventional water flooding. Based on the obtained results, both surfactants were efficient, and more oil was recovered than that obtained through water flooding. Comparing both surfactant solutions, it was observed that Triton X-405 was more efficient than Triton X-100 at the same surfactant concentration and reservoir conditions. Keywords Surfactant flooding. Enhanced oil recovery. Triton X-405. Interfacial tension. Critical micelle concentration Nomenclatures Brine 1 10% Brine (100% NaCl) Brine 2 10% Brine (95% NaCl+5% CaCl 2) Brine 3 10% Brine (83% NaCl+17% CaCl 2) CMC Critical micelle concentration EOR Enhanced oil recovery HLB Hydrophilic lipophilic balance IFT
Journal of Petroleum Exploration and Production Technology, 2019
Enhanced oil recovery (EOR) processes have a great potential to maximize oil recovery factor of the existing reservoirs, where a significant volume of the unrecovered oil after conventional methods is targeted. Application of chemical EOR techniques includes the process of injecting different types of chemicals into a reservoir to improve the overall sweep efficiency. Surfactant flooding is one of the chemical EOR used to reduce the oil–water interfacial tension and to mobilize residual oil toward producing wells. Throughout the process of surfactant flooding, selecting a suitable surfactant for the reservoir conditions is quite challenging. Surfactants tend to be the major factor associated with the cost of an EOR process, and losing surfactants leads to substantial economic losses. This process could encounter a significant loss of surfactant due to adsorption into the porous media. Surfactant concentration, salinity, temperature, and pH were found to be as the main factors that i...
Evaluation of optimum surfactant concentration needed for Niger delta oil recovery in Nigeria
International Journal of Petroleum Engineering, 2016
This paper presents laboratory analysis of optimum surfactant concentration needed for Niger delta oil recovery in Nigeria. Eight experiments were carried out on a crude sample from the field with different surfactant concentrations to water (0.1%, 0.3%, 0.5%, 0.7%, 0.9%, 1.1%, 1.3%, 1.5% surfactant) using glass beads to simulate the actual field process. Brine saturation, oil saturation, water flooding, surfactant flooding and polymer flooding were done for each of the eight experiments performed and the resulting recoveries were analysed and compared. Then, the optimum surfactant concentration was identified. The results show that 0.9% surfactant concentration is the optimum concentration needed for flooding in this field. Any concentration more than or less than 0.9% would yield less than the optimum recovery. It would be uneconomical to maintain a surfactant concentration higher than 0.9%. Recovery does not necessarily increase with increasing surfactant concentration in the mobilising slug. The field operators in this field are hereby advised to consider 0.9% surfactant concentration.
International Journal of Oil, Gas and Coal Technology, 2016
Because of a large amount of remained oil in reservoirs after the secondary or tertiary recovery, sometimes using profitable methods such as surfactant-alternating gas (SAG) is reasonable. For preparing stable foams, it is very crucial to inject at optimum rate. Foam strength can be suppressed during inappropriate conditions and drying out the foam within the porous media. In this study, the effects of adsorbent, gas phase, surfactant concentration, and sacrificial agent on sodium dodecyl sulphate (SDS) adsorption density were examined by using static and dynamic adsorption experiments. Hence, a series of SAG tests were designed to evaluate the effects of injection rates, first injected phase type, injection mode and presence of calcium lignosulphonate (CLS) on the oil recovery. During SAG injection, the results showed that the oil mobility was reduced 65%. SAG injection as secondary mode was more efficient and the same ultimate recovery was achieved with lower cost.
ACS Omega
Surfactant polymer flooding is one of the most common chemical enhanced oil recovery techniques, which improves not only the microscopic displacement of the fluid through the formation of the emulsion but also the volumetric sweep efficiency of the fluid by altering the viscosity of the displacing fluid. However, one constraint of surfactant flooding is the loss of the surfactant by adsorption onto the reservoir rock surface. Hence, in this study, an attempt has been made to reduce the adsorption of the surfactant on the rock surface using novel colloidal silica nanoparticles (CSNs). CSNs were used as an additive to improve the performance of the conventional surfactant polymer flooding. The reduction in adsorption was observed in both the presence and absence of a polymer. The presence of a polymer also reduced the adsorption of the surfactant. Addition of 25 vol % CSNs effectively reduced the adsorption of up to 61% in the absence of a polymer, which increased to 64% upon the introduction of 1000 ppm polymer in the solution at 2500 ppm of the surfactant concentration at 25°C. The adsorption of surfactant was also monitored with time, and it was found to be increasing with respect to time. The adsorption of surfactant increased from 1.292 mg/g after 0.5 days to 4.179 mg/g after 4 days at 2500 ppm of surfactant concentration at 25°C. The viscosity, surface tension, and wettability studies were also conducted on the chemical slug used for flooding. The addition of CSNs effectively reduced the surface tension as well as shifted the wettability toward water-wet at 25°C. Sand pack flooding experiments were performed at 60°C to access the potential of CSNs in oil recovery, and it was found that the addition of 25 vol % CSNs in the conventional surfactant polymer chemical slug aided in the additional oil recovery up to 5% as compared to that of the conventional surfactant polymer slug.
A laboratory feasibility study of dilute surfactant injection for the Yibal field, Oman
Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 2005
The Yibal field, the largest oil field in Oman, comprises 15% of the oil production of the country. The field has had a high ultimate recovery factor and in order to maintain the current recovery trend, different management strategies have been sought. One of the options is the injection of a dilute surfactant in addition to the current waterflooding.