A Glossary of Critical Discourse Analysis (original) (raw)
Related papers
Principles, Theories and Approaches to Critical Discourse Analysis
2018
Abstract: Critical Discourse Analysis (hereafter CDA) is a cross-discipline set forth in the early 1990s by a group of scholars such as Theo van Leeuwen, Gunther Kress, Teun van Dijk, and Norman Fairclough (Wodak & Meyer, 2001). Since the last decade or so, there has been a resurgence of the application of the theory of CDA to a range of studies (Bloor & Bloor, 2007; Bayram, 2010; Jahedi & Abudullah, 2012; Parham, 2013; Akogbeto & Koukpossi, 2015; Koussouhon & Dossoumou, 2015; Koussouhon & Amoussou, 2016; etc.).In view to spurring on the use of that research paradigm, the current study attempts to clarify what it means to say that one is doing critical discourse analysis. In that endeavor, it sheds light on the principles underlying the concept, the methods it draws on, as well as the focal approaches to CDA that have thus far been put forth by prominent scholars. Keywords: Approach, Critical Discourse Analysis, Discourse Analysis, Paradigm, Theory.
Critical Discourse Analysis TEUN A . VAN DIJK 0 Introduction : What Is Critical Discourse Analysis ?
2015
Critical Discourse Analysis (CDA) is discourse analytical research that primarily studies the way social-power abuse and inequality are enacted, reproduced, legitimated, and resisted by text and talk in the social and political context. With such dissident research, critical discourse analysts take an explicit position and thus want to understand, expose, and ultimately challenge social inequality. This is also why CDA may be characterized as a social movement of politically committed discourse analysts. One widespread misunderstanding of CDA is that it is a special method of doing discourse analysis. There is no such method: in CDA all methods of the cross-discipline of discourse studies, as well as other relevant methods in the humanities and social sciences, may be used (Wodak and Meyer 2008; Titscher et al. 2000). To avoid this misunderstanding and to emphasize that many methods and approaches may be used in the critical study of text and talk, we now prefer the more general ter...
Critical Discourse Analysis: An Overview1
International journal of Arabic-English studies, 2009
This paper provides an overview of Critical Discourse Analysis (CDA), a relatively recent approach to analyzing discourse. The paper begins with the various definitions of the term "discourse," then provides a brief overview of the basic tenets of CDA as outlined by its practitioners. This is followed by a summary of two representative works in CDA. The merits of CDA are pointed out, as are the criticisms leveled at the approach and the responses to them. The paper concludes with a general evaluation of the contributions of CDA to the field of discourse analysis.
A Comparative Study of Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis (CDA)
2014
This research is a comparative study of approaches to Critical Discourse Analysis (CDA) with the aim of evaluating the possibility of synthesis. Concerning the question of synthesis, the research posed the following question: Is it actually possible to find synthesis between the very different and very diverse approaches to CDA research? The research hypothesis is that given the arguably similar research agenda associated with CDA, synthesis is plausible even though it is indeed difficult to achieve. Based on a comparison of the Socio-cognitive approach and the Dialectical-relational approach, the research attempted to evaluate the possibility of synthesis. The results however, are inconclusive. The research concludes by reflecting on the issue of 'analysis' in Critical Discourse Analysis by proposing the adoption of 'study' to signify a clearer focus.
According to van Dijk (1998a) Critical Discourse Analysis (CDA) is a field that is concerned with studying and analyzing written and spoken texts to reveal the discursive sources of power, dominance, inequality and bias. It examines how these discursive sources are maintained and reproduced within specific social, political and historical contexts. In a similar vein, Fairclough (1993) defines CDA as discourse analysis which aims to systematically explore often opaque relationships of causality and determination between (a) discursive practices, events and texts, and (b) wider social and cultural structures, relations and processes; to investigate how such practices, events and texts arise out of and are ideologically shaped by relations of power and struggles over power; and to explore how the opacity of these relationships between discourse and society is itself a factor securing power and hegemony. (p. 135) To put it simply, CDA aims at making transparent the connections between discourse practices, social practices, and social structures, connections that might be opaque to the layperson.
Critical Discourse Analysis : Concepts, Methods, Applications
Critical Discourse Analysis: Concepts, Methods and Applications Transcript of the presentation given at the Intensive Week Methods Training for Postgraduate Students Open University, 13th – 17th July 2020 Dr. Franco Zappettini Department of Communication & Media – University of Liverpool Franco.Zappettini@liverpool.ac.uk @frazapuk
Critical discourse analysis and its critics
Pragmatics 21.4
This article briefly reviews the rise of Critical Discourse Analysis and teases out a detailed analysis of the various critiques that have been levelled at CDA and its practitioners over the last twenty years, both by scholars working within the “critical” paradigm and by other critics. A range of criticisms are discussed which target the underlying premises, the analytical methodology and the disputed areas of reader response and the integration of contextual factors. Controversial issues such as the predominantly negative focus of much CDA scholarship, and the status of CDA as an emergent “intellectual orthodoxy”, are also reviewed. The conclusions offer a summary of the principal criticisms that emerge from this overview, and suggest some ways in which these problems could be attenuated.