Mexico's New Foreign Policy: Between Pragmatism and Principism (original) (raw)
Related papers
Mexican Foreign Policy and Diplomacy: From Defensive Tradition to Incomplete Modernity
Politics & Policy, 2019
Two characteristic aspects of Mexican foreign policy and its operative arm, diplomacy, define the challenges the country must face in the twenty-first century: one is a doctrinarian diplomatic tradition of goodwill and defensiveness (principles of nonintervention, self-determination, and peaceful conflict resolution), which is clearly inadequate for facing current global challenges. The other is a fragmented push for modernity whose scope is limited to certain areas of the diplomatic agenda (human rights, democracy, multilateral activism), with a strong focus on specific contemporary issues (gender equality, the United Nations' 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development and the inclusion of civil society) which, at least in the short term, lacks the necessary strength and tools to define the course of Mexico's foreign policy.
MEXICO’S FOREIGN POLICY: MULTIPLE IDENTITIES IN A SHIFTING WORLD
"The Road Ahead: the 21st Century World Order in the Eyes of Policy Planners". In an ever-changing and interconnected global context, foreign affairs ministries have become neuralgic centers for every State. Globalization, technological change, and increasing economic interdependence have given way to shared challenges that make cooperation more necessary and urgent than ever. We are living in an era of profound and fast-paced changes in the international system, marked by uncertainty and shared risks. The world faces a redistribution of economic, political, and social power. Terrorism, climate change, human displacement, and nuclear weapons stand out as some of the most alarming phenomena that call on globally coordinated solutions. Mexico is no stranger to this collective task.
Mexico's Foreign Policy under President Salinas: Searching for Friends Abroad
Mexico"s official foreign policy under Carlos Salinas (1988)(1989)(1990)(1991)(1992)(1993)(1994) was defined as a search for economic modernization and diversification in its external relations. Traditional elements of Mexican foreign affairs were largely turned upside down, even if the Salinas diplomatic team maintained its traditional discourse in multilateral fora. The new Mexico became pragmatic, internationalist, pro-American and economistic. However, attempts to diversify economic relations and build economic bridges with Europe and Asia did not bear fruit. When the dust settled, Mexico had devoted most of its political capital on cultivating its relations with the United States, and largely distanced itself from Latin America. NAFTA, the crowning achievement of the sexenio, did not necessarily render Mexico more politically vulnerable, as common wisdom has it and, paradoxically, it may yet prove the key to enhanced diversification. But however one judges Salinas" term in office, it is clear that the political economy orientation his administration gave Mexico has become institutionalized. Therefore, making sense of current Mexican foreign policy requires an understanding of the Salinas era.
MIKTA: Expanding the Scope of Mexican Foreign Policy
The article examines the objectives of Mexico as a member of MIKTA, a group that also involves Indonesia, the Republic of Korea, Turkey and Australia. Achievements in the first three years since the group was created are reviewed. The main challenges and opportunities for the consolidation of MIKTA and the potential that it bears for Mexican foreign policy are also pointed out.
Mexico’s Foreign Policy under Salinas: The Search for Friends in the First World
Iberoamericana – Nordic Journal of Latin American and Caribbean Studies, 2001
I. INTRODUCTION After years in the wings, Mexico is poised for the spotlight. The club of rich nations hails it as the perfect student of economics. What better candidate for stardom than this country of 85 million people, which went bust so publicly just over ten years ago and which has since embarked on dramatic and successful economic reforms? .Mr. Salinas has a claim to be hailed as one the great men of the 20th century (The Economist 1993).
Resistance from Within: Why Mexico's Attempt to Advance an Active Foreign Policy Failed
Review of Policy Research, 2005
After becoming the first opposition candidate to win since 1910, President Vicente Fox kindled expectations at both national and international levels. He claimed he would enhance significantly the scope of the Mexico's foreign policy and engage the country in international politics in a way more befitting of its newly acquired democratic status. Nevertheless, little consideration was given to the fact that for many decades foreign policy in Mexico had been deployed to create an area screened-off from domestic politics where conflicting factions were brought together and a policy consensus worked out. That consensus was sufficiently ample for the authoritarian elite, given its foreign policy goals and principles. It would, however, fail to suffice for any political leader willing to step outside the box of tradition. Fox did just that. In consequence, widespread reactions of disapproval from key political actors and the media led the president to settle for a more modest international agenda in 2002. This article explores the key processes that triggered so much internal resistance to Fox's foreign policy designs. I argue that these processes underpin what continues to be the essentially autarchic nature and scope of the Mexican foreign policy tradition. Such an autarchic approach is glorified in Mexican political rhetoric, yet has led to many lost opportunities for Mexico. Most importantly, I stress that the Mexican foreign policy tradition discourages and forecloses the kind of engagement in the international arena that seeks to share in rather than to free-ride the collective efforts of the international community to procure security and peace. So despite its new democratic status, Mexico remains more of a spectator than an actor on the international stage.
Mexican Policy and Its Implications for United States-Mexico Relations
Mexican Policy and Its Implications for United States -Mexico Relations, in Sucesión Presidencial, 1991
Hacia principios de los años 90 del siglo XX, en México emergieron dos tendencias políticas con posiciones distintas frente a la apertura de la economía mexicana al exterior y ante el ¨cambio estructural¨ que además implicana un repliegue sustancial del Estado como actor económico directo. Se trata de la coyuntura preliminar a la firma del Tratado de Libre Comercio entre Estados Unidos, Canadá y México. La disputa por la apertura política y transición democrática -encabezada en aquél momento por el Frente Democrático Nacional (FDN) transcurría paralela a fundamentales reformas económicas.
A Critique of Mexico—US Relations: Beyond the Contemporary Impasse
2012
Though the preceding two articles on intergovernmental relations provide instructive insights, they share a crucial limitation that reflects a widespread tendency: the assumption that Mexico can be treated comparatively — without strong qualifications — as a 'consolidated' liberal democratic state in the sense that is valid for the US and Canada. Tom Keating does not need to deal with this question because o f his focus on a comparison o f Canada and the US. The discussion of Mexican—Canadian relations, on the other hand, for rather different reasons does not adequately address the profound significance of the fact that as a form of society or social formation Mexico is qualitatively different, with profound implications for the nature o f its politics. Nevertheless, in focusing on security issues, Athanasios Hristoulas can justifiably focus on intergovernmental relations relatively independently of the question of deeper differences. The precariousness of the assumption tha...
Foreign Policy and Governance in Mexico A Conceptual and Operational Dilemma
2008
(CISAN). 1 I thank Bernadette Vega, my research assistant, for her valuable support in the final editing of this text, originally presented at the Advanced Seminar Lecture Series on U.S.-Mexico Relations, sponsored by the UNAM's Center for Research on North America (CISAN) and MSU's Center for Latin American and Caribbean Studies, held in July 2008. 2 This concept has recently been coined to replace the term "globalization" in order to explain today's economic process, in which the aim is to improve macroeconomic indicators regardless of growing dependency and the widening gap between rich and poor. It is a neoliberal globalization emphasizing privatization, liberalization, free trade and widespread democratization, but using for these goals existing widespread technological innovations and generally disregarding the population's welfare.
Resumen En este artículo paso revista a la evolución de la agenda de seguridad Mexico-Estados Unidos desde que la relación entre ambos países se nor-malizó completamente, tomando la identidad estatal post-revolucionaria, el Nacionalismo Revolucionario, como la variable explicativa clave el proceso. En la primera sección conjeturo acerca de la construcción de la identidad y sus múltiples significados. En la segunda, analizo la identi-dad estatal post-revolucionaria como la base sobre la cual se estableció la relación de seguridad con su vecino del norte. En las siguientes tres secciones me centro en tres casos: la Segunda Guerra Mundial, la Cuba Comunista, y el tráfico de estupefacientes. Conforme la identidad de Mexico ha evolucionado, una especie de «seguridad en partes» parece estar emergiendo en esta díada norteamericana. Abstract I review the evolution of the U.S.-Mexico security agenda since the relationship between the two countries became fully normalized, taking the post-revolutionary state identity, Revolutionary Nationalism, as the key explanatory factor in the process. In the first section I elaborate on the