MENA developments during 2017 - political will in USA, little in EU (MED2) (original) (raw)
Related papers
EU's Foreign Policy: Ground Evidence from MENA Current State of Affairs
Regardless of expectations for a " cessation of zero-sum geopolitical rivalries " 1 the erosion of both US and EU balance of power in the multi-polar antagonism in the region has been triggered by a authoritative local leadership that can be denounced as amplifying extremities and political secularization, re-emergence of nationally constructed foreign policy aims within the EU and the upturn of Russian and Chinese presence that is blundering the goals of the former. The quintessential fragility of the institutional governance has led to a shift towards non-state actors, seeking to placate the numerous antinomies in the region, whilst at the same time the non-compliancy of strong actors such as Turkey and Iran and the new assertiveness and financial patronage of Saudi and Qatar are leading to the transfiguration of radical groups into stakeholders, as well as the subsequent frangible competitiveness between Saudi and Iran over Syria and the governmental loss of control over territories in Algeria, Egypt, Tunisia and Libya. EU's involvement in the Syrian conflict has often been perceived as a policy failure, as the stakes on the table with Iran have yet to prove consequential. Russia is increasingly liaising with Saudi, Hezbollah and is playing a decisive role in the economic uphold of Iran, pressing the regime change at all possible levels. These factors, combined with the inwardness of the European leadership have rendered its existing framework potentially inoperable and have been symbolically superseded with the appointment of a
A Half-Empty Glass: Limits and Dilemmas of the EU's Relations to the MENA Countries
Rome, IAI, March 2019, 30 p. (MENARA Working Papers ; 32), 2019
The decades’ long relationship between the European Union and the Middle East and North Africa (MENA) has gone through different stages and phases in response to regional events, developments in the EU and broader global geopolitical trends. While navigating through often troubled waters, the EU has fallen prey to three main false dilemmas or perceived dichotomies regarding its role in the region. These dilemmas have taken on a life of their own and have impinged on the EU’s ability to realize its full potential. As such, the promotion of democracy has been perceived in opposition to the stability and security of the MENA countries and ultimately of the EU; the need to cooperate with the MENA governments has come at the expense of true engagement with their societies; and multilateralism and bilateralism have often been portrayed and pursued not as complementary but as alternative choices.
The Mena Region: A Great Power Competition
2019
The volume deals with competition among regional and external players for the redistribution of power and international status in the Middle East and North Africa, with a focus on Russia's renewed role and the implications for US interests. Over the last few years, a crisis of legitimacy has beset the liberal international order. In this context, the configuration of regional orders has come into question, as in the extreme case of the current collapse in the Middle East. The idea of a "Russian resurgence" in the Middle East set against a perceived American withdrawal has captured the attention of policymakers and scholars alike, warranting further examination. This volume, a joint publication by ISPI and the Atlantic Council, gathers analysis on Washington's and Moscow's policy choices in the MENA region and develops case studies of the two powers' engagament in the countries beset by major crises.
Navigating the Regional Chessboard. Europe's Options to Address Conflicts in the MENA Region
Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung, Regional Peace and Security Project, 2020
As the year 2020 draws to a close, the conflicts and tensions in Syria, Libya and Yemen have been ongoing for nearly a decade, while the conflict in Iraq has been ongoing almost continuously since 2003. In all four conflicts regional and international actors played an ever more important role over the years, whereas European actors had little to no strategies at hand to contribute to a peaceful settlement of these conflicts. This edited volume presents 13 papers, dealing with different aspects of regional involvements in these conflicts. At the end of each paper, the reader will find a number of regionally informed policy recommendations, mainly addressing the European community, on how to deal with regional actors in a constructive way and how to potentially mitigate and manage conflicts through a more concerted, active and coherent European involvement in the region
Challenges posed by the MENA 2 region to the European Union
In 2016, in the crisis areas of the Middle East and North Africa have not happened significant positive changes. The only encouraging event was the action of the western coalition against the so called Islamic State. The author analyzes the perspectives of the two crisis areas, namely Syria and Libya, referring to the effects of the unresolved migrant issue. Besides the two crisis zones, he presents also the situation of foreign fighters and the security risks posed by their return. He specifies the measures taken by the EU and its member states to avert and handle the threat represented by returning foreign fighters.
Rome, IAI, April 2019, 16 p. (MENARA Final Reports ; 4), 2019
This report provides policy recommendations to European Union (EU) policy makers with regard to the EU’s engagement in the Middle East and North Africa (MENA) region. It draws on the inputs and insights gathered during three years of research conducted by the MENARA Project. It argues that designing a new flexible roadmap to advance mutual engagement and cooperation between the EU and the MENA is a key priority and an opportunity that should not be missed. This endeavour should take into account global and regional geopolitical shifts.