CREATING QUALITY EMPLOYMENT IN GERMANY-INSTITUTIONS, POLICIES AND POLITICAL ECONOMY (original) (raw)
Related papers
2000
Content: 1. German Capitalism in the 1990s: From "German model" to "German disease"? 2. First attempt at an Alliance for Jobs-The failure of the "Zwickelinitiative" 3. Under a new social-democratic government: The second attempt at an Alliance for Jobs 3.1. The foundation of the new Alliance for Jobs and its institutional structure 3.2. Alliances for Jobs at a lower level 3.2.1. Alliances for Job" at regional level 3.2.2. Employment pacts at company level 4. Role and substance of the Alliance for Jobs-different conceptions of the parties involved 4.1. Two alternative conceptions within the new red-green government 4.2. Conceptions of business and trade unions 5. Alliance for Jobs-main policy fields 5.1. Collective bargaining policy 5.1.1. Debates on an "employment-oriented" collective bargaining policy 5.1.2. Does wage restraint promote employment? 5.1.3. Trade union initiatives for early retirement 5.1.4. Alliance's final statement on an "employment-oriented" collective bargaining policy 5.1.5. The impact of the Alliance on collective bargaining policy 5.2. Promotion of employment through the extension of a low wage sector? 5.3. Vocational and further training 5.4. Tax and fiscal policy 6. Germany's social pact: competitive corporatism and beyond? 6.1. Supply-side corporatism and the absence of the macroeconomic dimension 6.2. Social pacts: enforcing national competition or strengthening European coordination? 6.3. Beyond competitive corporatism References 1. German Capitalism in the 1990s: >From "German model" to "German disease"? Until the early 1990s German capitalism was widely regarded as a successful "model" combining strong economic performance with a relatively high level of welfare and a comparably low level of social inequality (Streeck 1997). Since then, however, the international image of German capitalism has changed dramatically to the worst. At the end of the 1990s there seemed to be a broad consensus within both the political and the academic community that the German model is faced by a fundamental crisis which for some observers has already entered the stage of a "German disease" (Scharpf 1998). * Percentage change on preceding year, data for 1999-01 based on a forecast by the European Commission in autumn 1999 ** Nominal Unit labour costs divided by GDP price deflator ***
Reforming German Labor Market Institutions: A Dual Path to Flexibility
Journal of European Social Policy, 2011
Germany has always been one of the prime examples of institutional complementarities between social insurance, a rather passive welfare state, strong employment protection and collective bargaining that stabilize diversified quality production. This institutional arrangement was criticized for being the main cause of inferior labor market performance and increasing fiscal pressure on the welfare state while at the same time inhibiting
of LaborReforming German Labor Market Institutions: A Dual Path to Flexibility
2013
Any opinions expressed here are those of the author(s) and not those of IZA. Research published in this series may include views on policy, but the institute itself takes no institutional policy positions. The Institute for the Study of Labor (IZA) in Bonn is a local and virtual international research center and a place of communication between science, politics and business. IZA is an independent nonprofit organization supported by Deutsche Post Foundation. The center is associated with the University of Bonn and offers a stimulating research environment through its international network, workshops and conferences, data service, project support, research visits and doctoral program. IZA engages in (i) original and internationally competitive research in all fields of labor economics, (ii) development of policy concepts, and (iii) dissemination of research results and concepts to the interested public. IZA Discussion Papers often represent preliminary work and are circulated to enco...
Employment in Germany 1984 to 2019: Between stability and change
Academia Letters, 2022
The economic system is one of the functional systems of modern societies (Runkel/Burkart 2005). The system of employment links individual actors (as employed persons) to the economic system (Schramm 1992). It forms a social interface between business and education (vocational qualifications), politics (industrial relations), law (individual and collective law), etc. It also forms an interface between the basic elements of society: action systems (personal and social systems), social structure and social semantics (culture and knowledge), living environments (working world). The world of work is a place of shared experiences of the actors, of individual and collective socialization as well as the reproduction of social structure and semantics. The (segmented) labour market distributes not only roles and positions in the employment system, but also social opportunities and risks (Schlese/Schramm 1994). In this article, the employment system is described over time with the help of data from the SocioEconomic Panel (Schramm 1999). The SocioEconomic Panel (SOEP) is one of the largest and longest-running multidisciplinary household surveys worldwide. Every year, approximately 30,000 people in 15,000 households are interviewed for the SOEP study. The SOEP is also a research-driven infrastructure based at DIW Berlin (https://www.diw.de/en/ diw_01.c.392080.en/mission.html). The change in the German employment system over time can be described with a few important indicators: employable and active persons in relation to the resident population, forms of employment, required skills in the workplace, level of employment (by gender) and stability of employment. The design of the SOEP is extensively presented on the Internet. As a method for answering the research question, the descriptive presentation of extrapolated case numbers was chosen. The limits of research lie firstly in the collection of the sample and the quality of the extrapolation. In addition, panel effects cannot be ruled out. Secondly, these are statements by those affected, which does not exclude
Alliance for jobs - is Germany following the path of "competitive corporatism"?
84, 2000
Content: 1. German Capitalism in the 1990s: From "German model" to "German disease"? 2. First attempt at an Alliance for Jobs-The failure of the "Zwickelinitiative" 3. Under a new social-democratic government: The second attempt at an Alliance for Jobs 3.1. The foundation of the new Alliance for Jobs and its institutional structure 3.2. Alliances for Jobs at a lower level 3.2.1. Alliances for Job" at regional level 3.2.2. Employment pacts at company level 4. Role and substance of the Alliance for Jobs-different conceptions of the parties involved 4.1. Two alternative conceptions within the new red-green government 4.2. Conceptions of business and trade unions 5. Alliance for Jobs-main policy fields 5.1. Collective bargaining policy 5.1.1. Debates on an "employment-oriented" collective bargaining policy 5.1.2. Does wage restraint promote employment? 5.1.3. Trade union initiatives for early retirement 5.1.4. Alliance's final statement on an "employment-oriented" collective bargaining policy 5.1.5. The impact of the Alliance on collective bargaining policy 5.2. Promotion of employment through the extension of a low wage sector? 5.3. Vocational and further training 5.4. Tax and fiscal policy 6. Germany's social pact: competitive corporatism and beyond? 6.1. Supply-side corporatism and the absence of the macroeconomic dimension 6.2. Social pacts: enforcing national competition or strengthening European coordination? 6.3. Beyond competitive corporatism References 1. German Capitalism in the 1990s: >From "German model" to "German disease"? Until the early 1990s German capitalism was widely regarded as a successful "model" combining strong economic performance with a relatively high level of welfare and a comparably low level of social inequality (Streeck 1997). Since then, however, the international image of German capitalism has changed dramatically to the worst. At the end of the 1990s there seemed to be a broad consensus within both the political and the academic community that the German model is faced by a fundamental crisis which for some observers has already entered the stage of a "German disease" (Scharpf 1998). * Percentage change on preceding year, data for 1999-01 based on a forecast by the European Commission in autumn 1999 ** Nominal Unit labour costs divided by GDP price deflator ***