Four Models of Protecting Citizenship and Social Rights in Europe: Conclusions to the Special Issue 'Rethinking the European Social Market Economy' (original) (raw)
Related papers
The nature and rationale for European social rights
2021
Over the last few years, the European Commission has repeatedly emphasized that, in the face of global uncertainty, the EU has to strengthen its social dimension and foster better working and living conditions for its citizens. To achieve this, the EU wants to strengthen social citizenship by advancing social rights, implementing the principles in the European Pillar of Social Rights at both the European and national level. The overarching objective of the EuSocialCit project, of which this paper is part, is to examine the state of EU social citizenship as well as possible policy scenarios that may strengthen it. This prompts initial foundational questions for the project: what is the nature of EU social citizenship and the social rights associated with it? And, what is the rationale for the EU to be involved in providing social rights? In order to understand the state and nature of EU social citizenship and the role that the EU plays in this now and in the future, we believe that i...
Towards a ‘Holding Environment’ for Europe’s (Diverse) Social Citizenship Regimes
Debating European Citizenship, 2018
Maurizio Ferrera has written an important and timely response paper to Rainer Bauböck's call to 'add stuff' to EU citizenship. Standing on the shoulders of the equally perceptive and nuanced ideas on citizenship rights by T.H. Marshall, Ferrera ventures to explore the political space for raising, in an incremental fashion, elements of 'social' citizenship to the level of the EU, in full recognition of the overriding significance of the member states as the principal providers and guardians of highly diverse welfare benefits and services. Ferrera, like Marshall before him, believes that social citizenship does not only provide individuals with an elementary right to economic opportunity and security, through poverty relief, universal access to health care and education, labour market services, unemployment, sickness and old age insurance, but that social citizenship also encourages a sense of community membership and belonging, referred to by Marshall as sharing 'to the full in the social heritage and to live the life of a civilised being according to the standard prevailing in society'. 1 It is this sense of moral integrity and community loyalty, historically an important (by-)product of national welfare state building, that the EU sorely lacks. More perversely, it has been argued, among others by Fritz Scharpf and Wolfgang Streeck, 2 that the intricate connection of EU citizenship to free movement in the internal market and, for the Eurozone, budgetary rules setting limits to discretionary fiscal reflation in times of demand-deficient unemployment, in effect undermines national welfare state capacities to maintain social citizenship achievements, won over decades of national political struggle for the improvement of people's life chances and the protection of vulnerable citizens-the aged, the sick, the unemployed-from economic, social and political marginalisation.
A (Modest) Proposal for Expanding Social Citizenship In the European Union
Journal of European social policy, 2001
Compared to the resounding (if rather vacuous) commitment in the Treaty of Maastricht to political citizenship, the European Union (EU) has made only fitful and erratic progress in defining its social citizenship. No one should be surprised that there is so little "Social Europe" (Schmitter 1997). If anything, the absence of any substantial commitment by the members of the EU to harmonize, or even to coordinate their social policies is over-determined. So many objective features of what the Euro-polity is not-at least, not yet-combine with several subjective aspects of the conjuncture in which Europeans are presently living that it is highly unlikely that much progress will be made in this domain for the foreseeable future. First, the member-states are at different levels of economic development. Their factors of production operate at systematically different levels of efficiency and relative scarcity and, hence, command different levels of income and return on investment. Variations in the social charges, tax regimes and formalities surrounding these different points of departure are important elements in determining the competitiveness of those striving to "catch up." Second, the member-states have acquired over the past +100 years quite diverse "packets" of social policies and (especially) ways of financing them. Moreover, their mass publics seem relatively firmly (if begrudgingly) committed to their respective national status quos-at least in the sense that they collectively resist reductions in the benefits to which they have become PDF created with FinePrint pdfFactory Pro trial version http://www.fineprint.com
The “other” EU Security: Social Protection
European Journal of Social Security, 2006
This paper focuses on the issue of social security in the EU as a different kind of security. It addresses four topics: the reluctance of the Member States to give up their legislative power to harmonise their social security systems within the European Union; the use of social security as a means of excluding unwanted immigrants; the social security protection of TCNs in EU legislation; and the possibilities of Article 14 European Convention of Human Rights, which prohibits discrimination, securing the entitlement to social security rights of TCNs. It concludes that the state's duty to provide security is no longer an exclusive privilege for own citizens and that the changing legal framework of citizenship in the European Union, the European Convention of Human Rights and the acquisition of EU residence rights by TCNs all challenge the sovereignty argument used by the individual states.
2019
The EU is no longer an organisation that merely pursues economic objectives, but it also evolves towards a more political and constitutionalised Union. The thesis supports that the political integration in the field of EU fundamental rights, is primarily evolving through a ‘triangular’, inter-connected system of protection, including the constructivist transformation of EU citizenship, the institutionalised developments, such as the EU Charter, and the protection of fundamental rights as general principles of EU law. Yet major components of a flawless fundamental rights policy as a whole, are still absent and this is even more perceptible during periods of crises, such as the recent financial crisis, where a lack in citizens’ rights protection is evident, especially in effective judicial protection, due to the difficulty in challenging the consequences of the conditionality imposed. The deficient protection largely derived from the restricted scope of application of fundamental righ...
The Social Policy Clash: EU Cross-Border Welfare, Union Citizenship and National Residence Clauses
[From the introduction]. Although the European Union has not formally been assigned welfare policy competence, it has for decades regulated social benefits between the member states. The social rights and obligations of the European migrant have for long been safeguarded by the EU, and the mutual welfare responsibility undertaken by the member states of the Union constitutes an extraordinary piece of social Europe. The focus of this paper is the long run welfare integration which has taken place in the European Community and has been expanded in the European Union through the coordination scheme of Community Regulation 1408/711. The regulation has recently been substantially reformed with the adoption of Regulation 883/20042, but has furthermore in key parts unfolded through issue linkages to Union citizenship and internal market principles. The paper seeks to demonstrate that a European welfare dimension has for long been a material fact, patched up by judicial activism versus poli...
European Integration and National Social Citizenship: Changing Boundaries, New Structuring?
Comparative Political Studies, 2003
The deepening of European integration has weakened the traditional coercive monopoly of the state on actors and resources that are crucial for the stability of redistributive institutions. The article explores these issues adopting a “state-building” perspective and drawing on Stein Rokkan's pioneering insights on boundary building and internal structuring. The first part of the article briefly presents the theoretical perspective. The second part sketches the development of national welfare institutions up to the early 1970s, underlining the importance of bounding processes. The third part describes the challenges recently emerged to the “social sovereignty” of the nation-state largely linked to European integration. The final part offers some more speculative remarks on the changing architecture of social protection, with some hints at cross-national variations and possible developments at the European Union level.
Social Citizenship, Democratic Values and European Integration: A Rejoinder
Debating European Citizenship, 2018
This Forum debate has gone way beyond my expectations and hopes. I thought that commentators would mainly address my proposals on enhancing rights and introducing duties. The conversation has instead extended to my diagnosis as well, to the rationale which lies at the basis of my prescriptive ideas. By focusing on starting points, the forum has thus brought into light different perspectives and styles of reasoning around citizenship and even broader political questions. With hindsight, I should have spelled out more carefully my basic assumptions. But there is time to remedy this nowand not just for the sake of this particular discussion. I am in fact convinced that a closer and more systematic dialogue between empirical, normative, legal and social theorists would be a welcome and beneficial innovation, a way to contrast excessive disciplinary perspectivism and the related risks of analytical lock-ins. I will begin this rejoinder by addressing the disagreement on starting points. I will then move to general issues of democracy, citizenship and social rights. Next, I will revisit my proposals in the light of the critiques and suggestions received. In the concluding section, I will broaden again the scope towards conceptions of justice, political legitimacy/stability as well as towards possible visions about the future of the EU.