Composite graft replacement of the aortic root in acute dissection (original) (raw)
Related papers
Composite graft replacement of the aortic root in acute dissection1
2000
Objective: In acute type A dissection the indication for composite graft replacement of the aortic root and the optimal implantation technique are a matter of debate. In this study early and late results of root replacement in acute dissection are determined and compared with supracoronary graft replacement. Two implantation techniques (open vs. inclusion) are evaluated. Methods: Between 1985 and 1995,
European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery, 2002
Objective: The aims of this study were: (i) to evaluate the early and long-term outcome in patients undergoing aortic root replacement (ARR) with a composite graft; (ii) to identify the predictors for poor overall survival in this pool of patients. Material and methods: Between January 1989 and December 2000, 212 patients underwent ARR with a CG. Mean age was 56^14 years, ranging from 16 to 77. Annuloaortic ectasia was the most frequent cause of aortic disease in this series, 81 (38%) patients, followed by atherosclerotic aneurysm 57 (27%) and type A acute aortic dissection 52 (24.5%). Marfan's syndrome was present in 37 (17.5%) patients. Duration of follow-up ranged from 1 to 120 months, mean 59^35 months. Results: The overall hospital mortality was 16 (7.5%) patients. Eight of them had aortic dissection and four Marfan syndrome. The most frequently found complication resulted to be renal failure in 22 (10%) patients and low cardiac output in 15 (7%) patients. The incidence of perioperative myocardial infarction, neurological complications, respiratory complications, renal failure and coagulopathy incidence were significantly higher in patients with cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) time .170 min, CA .40 min, and total aortic arch replacement. The actuarial survival at 1, 3 and 5 years resulted to be 91.8, 86 and 81.5%, instead the actuarial survival without re-operation resulted to be 89, 82 and 78%. The actuarial survival in patients with aortic dissection was significantly lower versus non-dissection (P ¼ 0:022). The multivariate analysis revealed the aortic dissection (P ¼ 0:03), age .65 years (P ¼ 0:014), associated coronary artery disease (P ¼ 0:002), NYHA functional class $ 3 (P ¼ 0:027), LVEF ,35% (P ¼ 0:002) and total arch reconstruction (P ¼ 0:003) as strong predictors for poor overall survival in patients undergoing ARR. Conclusions: The ARR with a CG offers acceptable early and long-term outcome. The predictors for poor overall survival in patients undergoing ARR seems to be preoperative aortic dissection extended into the aortic arch, older age, depressed left ventricular function and associated coronary artery disease. q
Aortic root replacement with composite valve graft
The Annals of Thoracic Surgery, 2003
Aortic root replacement with composite valve graft http://ats.ctsnetjournals.org/cgi/content/full/76/1/90 located on the World Wide Web at: The online version of this article, along with updated information and services, is Print ISSN: 0003-4975; eISSN: 1552-6259. Southern Thoracic Surgical Association. Background. Composite valve graft replacement is currently the treatment of choice for a wide variety of lesions of the aortic root and the ascending aorta. In this study we report our experience with aortic root replacement using a composite graft. Methods. Between October 1978 and May 2001, 274 patients (79.6% male and 20.4% female) with a mean age of 53.5 years underwent composite graft replacement of the aortic root. One hundred sixty-one patients (70.8%) had annuloaortic ectasia and 46 (16.8%) aortic dissection. The classic Bentall technique was used in 94 patients (34.3%), the "button technique" in 172 patients (62.8%), and the Cabrol technique in 8 patients (2.9%).
Twenty-seven-year experience with composite valve graft replacement of the aortic root
The Journal of heart valve disease, 2007
The study aim was to assess early and late outcome in patients undergoing composite valve graft replacement (CVGR) of the aortic root by means of the Bentall procedure, and to identify predictors of early and late death associated with this surgical approach. Between August 1975 and July 2002, 162 consecutive patients underwent a Bentall procedure for CVGR. Demographic, treatment and clinical outcome data from these patients were gathered, reviewed, and analyzed. Potential predictors of early and late mortality were analyzed. The study population was predominantly male (n = 132; 81.5%) and middle-aged (mean age 51.3 +/- 15.8 years; range: 10-79 years). The main indications for surgery were annuloaortic ectasia (n = 75; 46.3%), aortic dissection (n = 44; 27.2%) and Marfan syndrome (n = 34; 21%). Reoperation was required in 37 cases (22.8%). The mean follow up was 74 months. Early (in-hospital) mortality was 1.9% (n = 3). The only independent determinant of early mortality was cardiop...
Conservative treatment of the aortic root in acute type a dissection
European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery, 1999
In acute type A dissection long-term results of conservative aortic root surgery were compared with the outcome of primary valve and/or root replacement. Methods: Between 1985 and 1995, 199 patients (mean age 59 years, 154 men) were operated on. The aortic root was involved in the dissection process and valve incompetence of varying degree was present without exception. Replacement of a proximal aortic segment was standard procedure in all patients. The aortic valve was preserved in 126 patients: commissural suture resuspension (12 patients), root reconstruction with GRF-glue (gelatine-resorcin-formaldehyde/glutaraldehyde-glue) (114 patients). Valve replacement was performed in 73 patients (50 composite grafts, 23 valve prostheses with separate supracoronary grafts). Preoperative risk factors (valve replacement vs. preservation): coronary artery disease (11 vs. 8%, NS), tamponade (18 vs. 17%, NS), unstable hemodynamics (22 vs. 15%, NS), renal failure (4 vs. 6%, NS), neurologic disorder (19 vs. 32%, NS). Results: The overall early mortality was 23.6% (47/199 patients) and increased after commissural suture resuspension compared with GRF-glue reconstruction (P = NS). Parameters of the early postoperative period did not differ between conservative treatment and root/valve replacement: low cardiac output, 34 versus 38% (P = NS); myocardial infarction, 10 versus 11% (P = NS); hemorrhage, 25 versus 23% (P = NS); duration of intensive care (P = NS). Survival was 61% after 8 years without difference between the two principal treatment groups (P = NS) and between the two conservative subgroups (P = NS). At 2 years, GRF-glue reconstruction had an increased freedom from reoperation on the aortic root (92 vs. 70%, P = 0.0253) and event free survival (77 vs. 41%, P = 0.0224) compared with suture resuspension. Commissural suture resuspension was an independent, significant predictor for reoperation (P = 0.0221, relative risk = 4.7130). Conclusion: Surgery for acute type A dissection still carries a considerable early risk. Preservation of the aortic root is safe in the absence of Marfan or annuloaortic ectasia, but a certain incidence of reoperations on the aortic valve and the aortic root has to be accepted. Root reconstruction using GRF-glue is the method of choice and is superior to suture resuspension, with a significantly better reoperation-free and event-free survival.
Canadian journal of surgery. Journal canadien de chirurgie, 2017
Surgical approach to type A acute aortic dissection (AADA) is usually dictated by the presenting anatomy. We compared long-term outcomes of AADA repaired with a root replacement versus a supracoronary tube graft, regardless of the proximal extent of the intimal tear. A single-centre, retrospective cohort of consecutive patients undergoing repair of AADA between December 1999 and March 2012 were stratified based on the proximal surgical procedure performed: supracoronary tube graft or root replacement. Imaging, chart reviews and clinical follow-ups were analyzed to identify the presenting anatomy and clinical outcomes. We included the cases of 75 patients in our analysis: 54 received a supracoronary tube graft and 21 received a root replacement. The proximal tear was identified below the sinotubular junction in all patients in the root group and in 61% of patients in the supracoronary group. We detected no differences between the groups for in-hospital mortality, length of stay, or c...
Five-year experience in aortic root replacement with the flanged composite graft
The Annals of Thoracic Surgery, 2002
Background. Replacement of the aortic root with a composite graft containing a prosthetic mechanic valve is the preferred surgical procedure for tailoring the aortic root. The aim of this study is to determine the 5-year experience with the composite root replacement using our new modification of the Bentall technique.