Destabilisation and cultural literacy (original) (raw)
Related papers
Embedding Cultural Literacy in Higher Education: a new approach
Higher Education institutions face specific challenges preparing graduates to live and work in transdisciplinary and transcultural environments. It is imperative for these institutions to provide their students with the skill sets that will give them the mobility and flexibility to be able to operate efficiently in different cultural and professional contexts. This position paper proposes that developing proficiency in Cultural Literacy will allow graduates of Higher Education institutions to transcend such cultural and disciplinary boundaries. In this paper we define Cultural Literacy in Higher Education as a modus operandi and a threshold concept, following Meyer and Land’s understanding of the term. We also propose ‘Destabilisation’ and ‘Reflection’ as two strategies for teaching Cultural Literacy, and examine three case studies where these strategies were successfully embedded into teaching and learning spaces. This is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis in INTERCULTURAL EDUCATION on 19 JANUARY 2017, available online: http://www.tandfonline.com/10.1080/14675986.2016.1241551\].
2010
which benefits both Home and Overseas Students Graduates increasingly need to operate across national and cultural boundaries. This paper discusses the need to ensure that all students are equipped to operate within complex and diverse multicultural environments. The work builds on three earlier studies. Using these, the author has created a new theoretical fi:amework and designed an intervention which aimed to increase diverse students ' awareness of intercultural differences and their ability to function effectively in multicultural learning (and thus work) environments. The paper evaluates this highly innovative training. It concludes that it was effective in making a wide range of students aware of issues around cultural difference and competence. The training significantly changed the outlook of students who took part in it. Whilst the framework was robust, effective, and generalisable to other contexts, there are a number of issues which will be addressed in the re-runnin...
2010
Graduates increasingly need to operate across national and cultural boundaries. This paper discusses the need to ensure that all students are equipped to operate within complex and diverse multicultural environments. The work builds on three earlier studies. Using these, the author has created a new theoretical fi:amework and designed an intervention which aimed to increase diverse students' awareness of intercultural differences and their ability to function effectively in multicultural learning (and thus work) environments. The paper evaluates this highly innovative training. It concludes that it was effective in making a wide range of students aware of issues around cultural difference and competence. The training significantly changed the outlook of students who took part in it. Whilst the framework was robust, effective, and generalisable to other contexts, there are a number of issues which will be addressed in the re-running the programme. Introduction UK Higher Education...
Higher Education institutions face specific challenges preparing graduates to live and work in transdisciplinary and transcultural environments. It is imperative for these institutions to provide their students with the skill sets that will give them the mobility and flexibility to be able to operate efficiently in different cultural and professional contexts. This position paper proposes that developing proficiency in Cultural Literacy will allow graduates of Higher Education institutions to transcend such cultural and disciplinary boundaries. In this paper we define Cultural Literacy in Higher Education as a modus operandi and a threshold concept, following Meyer and Land’s understanding of the term. We also propose ‘Destabilisation’ and ‘Reflection’ as two strategies for teaching Cultural Literacy, and examine three case studies where these strategies were successfully embedded into teaching and learning spaces.
Decolonising the cultural policy and management curriculum – reflections from practice
Cultural Trends, 2023
Decolonising the curriculum is a global imperative that takes different forms and urgency depending on the context. Developments across the globe such as BlackLivesMatter and student responses to the pandemic and online learning have raised new questions about the curriculum – critically questioning higher education institutions’ plans about not only providing access to resources but about the (cultural) authority of curricula, pedagogical and research practices that are still dominated by Western discourses. This paper examines three experiences of curriculum decolonisation in cultural policy and management, an applied subject that has culture as its object, in three different contexts, Serbia, Puerto Rico, and South Africa: namely how the pursuit of a pluriversal knowledge ecology found expression in the curriculum, content and pedagogical practices deployed to deliver locally relevant education; and how educators resolved the ontological and epistemic discontinuities between the standard disciplinary canon and local realities to embed and contextualise the discipline. Keywords: decolonisation, epistemic justice, curriculum, content, pedagogy, cultural policy, and management
Challenging the Concept of Cultural Deficit, through a Framework of Critical-Based Education
2016
Marginalised, disadvantaged students fi nd the habitus of western, higher education institutions most unwelcoming. Central to the diffi culties, which they experience, is the defi cit-based compensatory model of widening participation applied to non-traditional learners. This model is refl ected in the “culture of poverty” hypothesis favoured by neo-liberal institutions as the means of “fi xing” the problems experienced by learners from disadvantaged backgrounds. Culture of poverty suggests people from lower socio-economic backgrounds share a series of universally consistent values and behaviours and places responsibility for the diffi culties, experiences by these individuals, with the individuals themselves and their communities rather than any systemic failings. Dealing with the problems experienced by those on the margins of society requires removing the defi cit paradigm and replacing it with an asset-based structure, grounded in critical learning practices.
The politics of remediation: cultural disbelief and non-traditional students
Odeniyi presents perspectives on student identity and academic ability. Ethnographic research at a London university found evidence of repeated Othering of a small group of students with diasporic connections. Consequently, it is argued successful exposure to academic culture, which includes reading, writing and knowledge-making, can only occur after engagement and participation is made possible for all students. Odeniyi remains uncomfortable with monolithic interventions at institutional level as they feed into native-speakerist discourses which can demonise the ‘non-western’, ‘non traditional’ student. Student-centred approaches to academic writing development can create opportunities within the university curriculum for ‘non-traditional’, ‘non-native’ students’ experiences to be valourised through writing and assessment practices which contribute to the suspension of cultural disbelief.