Dwelling in Carceral Space (original) (raw)
Related papers
Victories from Insurgency: Re‐Negotiating Housing, Community Control, and Citizenship at the Margins
Antipode, 2019
This article considers how insurgent campaigns for housing the poor in New York City and Chicago succeeded in engaging the local state, non‐profits and financial institutions in the creation of community land trusts. These campaigns had long arcs in which victories and losses built from each other, neither as permanent as they initially seemed. The campaigns moved iteratively between spaces of “invited citizenship” (courtrooms, planning committees) and “invented” spaces of collective action (property takeovers). They found their greatest success when, exploiting state incapacity to defend abandoned property, they elicited a degree of complicity from local governments in their takeovers of housing and land. The article thus contests dichotomised accounts of social movements that oppose losses to victories, cooptation to resistance, and movements to institutions. Instead, we call for situated and dynamic accounts of insurgent practice, capable of theorising the long, messy, co‐constit...
Neoliberal Confinements: Social Suffering in the Carceral State (Editors' Introduction)
This special issue aims to provide a cartography of some of the forms of social suffering experienced by marginalized and oppressed populations in the US carceral state. The contributors extend their gaze beyond the prison and its ancillary institutions to include spaces of confinement produced at the crossroads of racialized carceral regimes, hyper-policed neighborhoods, and widening zones of social abandonment.
Race and ethnicity I: Property, race, and the carceral state
Progress in Human Geography , 2019
In this report, I focus on property, particularly housing, as an essential race-making institution and consider its connections to the carceral state. I examine renewed attention to property within geography and some of the ways that scholars are engaging with property regimes as a means to theorize race. Situating property within the context of racial capitalism and critical carceral studies, I draw from struggles over segregation and open housing in Milwaukee, Wisconsin to illustrate the linkages between the city's housing crisis and policing. A robust body of literature documents the inseparability of race and crime, but I further contend that both are conjoined with the politics of residential property.
Review of International Studies, 2021
This article investigates the works of Dussel, Maldonado-Torres, and Mbembe as representatives of a tendency in the field of decolonial thought to assume the templates of warfare and the camp as the archetypal registers of violence in the contemporary world. Identifying this focus as the remnant of a Eurocentric vocabulary (the paradigm of war), the article proposes a shift from the language of warfare predominant in the field to a language of welfare. The article turns to the gated community (GC), instead of the camp, and the imperatives of (re)creation, instead of the logics of elimination, as new templates with which to make sense of modern/colonial violence. Moving beyond militaristic imagery, the analysis shows a form of violence that emerges as a response to the endless search for a life of convenience inside the walls of the GC. To this end, the article advances the concept of the dialect of disarrangement, the enforced but uneasy encounter between two subjectivities that inhabit the GC: the patrons (the homeowners who consume the easy life) and servants (the racialised service staff). In the GC, violence emerges in attempts to respond to this (in)convenient encounter via misrepresentations of both patrons and servants as out of their place.
Amerikastudien, 2023
On Property: Policing, Prisons, and the Call for Abolition could not be timelier in thinking about the longstanding entanglements between property and the policing of Black bodies. Part of the Biblioasis Field Notes series, this book takes as its point of departure the murder of George Floyd at the hands of Minneapolis police on May 25, 2020, during the first months of the coronavirus pandemic. Walcott writes: "That a Black man could be openly killed in the streets by state-sanctioned authority for passing a counterfeit twenty-dollar bill was not surprising to me. [...] We had seen it before, but in a pandemic in which the possibility of death was heightened for all of us, it seemed to ring differently" (12). On Property is divided into three compelling chapters and it uses the literary form of the pamphlet-a form that was essential to the movement to abolish the transatlantic slave trade and chattel slavery in the second half of the eighteenth and through the nineteenth century. Each chapter begins with a first-person account, which situates this piece not only within the author's personal story but also historically within the wider discursive and philosophical arena of abolitionist politics: Blackness and the violent space of the New World slave plantation (ch. 1); revolution and the Black body (ch. 2); and the carceral state and Black politics of care (ch. 3). It is this deep connection between personal account and the histories of Black resistance and revolution which allows the author to argue for the importance of the politics of abolition and its various practices, and to ask, "What does abolition mean in our time?" (13). In the first chapter entitled "Property is a Problem," Walcott takes the reader back to the New World plantation and its mechanics of managing, regulating, and "governing all aspects of a slave's life, especially with regard to movement" (20). At the center of such management and regulatory powers was the plantation's logics of Black abjection and propertization. The chapter shows that the first special forces of what was to become the police in North America would be established in conjunction with these logics in seventeenthcentury British colonies in the Caribbean (Barbados) and the North American mainland (e. g., Virginia) to monitor the movement of the enslaved. Walcott goes on to suggest that contemporary practices of policing such as street checks or carding are historically rooted in technologies of surveillance established on the plantation such as the slave pass. In this way, the plantation persists "as a largely unseen superstructure shaping modern, everyday life and many of its practices, attitudes, and assumptions, even if some of these have been, over time, transformed" (21). The second chapter-"Black Resistance and Conceptions of Property"shifts its focus to Black practices of revolution and resistance against the plantation's logic of possession. As the text suggests, these practices are fueled by Black people's "special relationship to property, having once been property ourselves" (43). Describing his experience of witnessing the Rodney King beating, trial, and 1992 "riots," Walcott remembers: "I was in Toronto watching US news reports and identifying with the defiance of those taking to the streets in a way I could feel in my body" (43). The chapter examines the functions of revolt and revolution in the context of Black people's "abolition journey" (48) and posits that the abolition of slavery was just the first step towards Black freedom. Walcott uses the term "riot" here not simply in a conventional sense to describe a "violent disturbance of the peace by a crowd" (OED) but also to delineate an impressive history of Black refusal and resistance against abjection, subjugation, Reviews
Sovereignty in the City: Sovereignty in the City: The Tacticalization of "Disallowed" Life
SPECTRA, 2017
In this paper, I perform close readings of several of the narratives included in the "This American Life" podcast episode "Harper High School" in order to continue the project of rethinking sovereignty outside of the framework of the state as it is lived and practiced in everyday life. Drawing on Bonnie Honig’s reformulation of sovereignty as a modality of power that is not possessed by a singular authority but instead embodied in the collective activity of a people, I use these narratives to assist in theorizing a politics that seeks not emancipation but rather the enactment of futures that are more egalitarian. Such a politics is best conceived as a struggle against forms of violence enacted at specific sites rather than as expressions of resistance against unified forms of domination. To undertake this analysis, I begin by briefly outlining Honig’s line of inquiry, after which I turn to the specific narratives documented by "This American Life," reading them not merely as the chronicles of life in Englewood but as theoretically fecund exemplars of collective and individual sovereignty. Finally, I conclude by exploring what the reading of such narratives as instances of sovereignty can reveal for us regarding politics more generally. Conceiving of the characters in these narratives as sovereign actors seeking to survive rather than as either helpless sufferers (those who experience violence) or criminals (those who act violently) helps to illuminate the complex political dynamics that sustain poverty and produce violence in locales such as Chicago’s Englewood neighborhood.
A New Mass Incarceration: Community Corrections, Carceral Geography, and Spatial Power
Scholarly Undergraduate Research Journal at Clark, 2018
In the age of Michelle Alexander’s The New Jim Crow (2010), promises to depopulate overcrowded American prisons, and a mainstream acknowledgment of mass incarceration, the American criminal justice system is anything but inert. Instead, modalities of punishment are shifting, particularly towards community-located corrections involving GPS surveillance. This paper seeks to examine this evolution of the carceral state through the marriage of two theoretical lenses: carceral geography and Foucauldian spatial power analysis. Carceral geography offers a theory of the embodied nuance of movement. Its work revolves around the three mobilities of the carceral system: movement to/from, within, and between prisons. This paper argues that community-located corrections comprises a fourth mobility, moving the carceral regime into communities and coercively moving bodies within those communities. Foucault supplements this analysis by offering a system to evaluate how space expresses power; this paper argues that community corrections fit Foucault’s model in that they distribute and disciplined bodies into partitioned space. Finally, having dug into the theoretical ramifications of a shift to community corrections, this paper will evaluate policy decisions, arguing that the racist violence of brick-and-mortar prisons justifies policy evolution, but that typical community corrections will not be a panacea for deeply rooted structural flaws.
Carceral Geographies from Inside Prison Gates: The Micro-Politics of Everyday Racialisation
Antipode, 2021
Addressing a need for carceral geographical research conducted from inside prison gates, we discuss the spatial context in which racialisation occurs, including its relationship to the performance of prison "politics". We argue that the convoluted and contentious racial categorisation of prison inmates that begins with "racial priming" and results in "racial sorting" possesses a spatial logic derived from institutional partitioning and street-level cordoning of individual and group identities. We reveal how racialisation is relied upon through both a self-segregation and institutional classification system at the micro scale. Based on autoethnographic reflection as formerly jailed and incarcerated individuals, and through a reading of sociological, criminological, and geographical literatures, we argue that the logic of everyday micro-scale racial identity formation has more to do with location, gang alliances, antagonisms, and the necessary navigating of prison "politics" and protocol than with conceptualisations of "race" engendered by racial capitalism and enforced by the racial state.
The minor politics of rightful presence: justice and relationality in City of Sanctuary
International Political Sociology
This article examines how historical and geographical relations of injustice are “made present” through the activities of the City of Sanctuary network in Sheffield, the UK. In so doing, it exposes the limitations of conceptualizing and enacting sanctuary through the frame of hospitality, and proposes an analytics of “rightful presence” as an alternative frame with which to address contemporary sanctuary practices. In contrast to a body of scholarship and activism that has focused on hospitality as extending the bounds of citizenship to “include” those seeking refuge, we consider how the “minor” politics of City of Sanctuary potentially trouble the assumptions on which such claims to inclusion rest. Our emphasis on the “minor” politics of “making present” injustices is important in bringing to bear an account of justice that is grounded in concrete political struggles, in contrast to the more abstract notion of a justice “to come,” associated with some accounts of hospitality. To explore sanctuary practices through a relational account of justice brings to bear a politically attuned account of rightful presence, which potentially challenges pastoral relations of guest–host and the statist framing of sanctuary with which relations of hospitality are intimately bound. This is important, we conclude, in countering the assumption that including the excluded solves the “problem,” or relieves the “crisis,” of asylum.