Examining China and India’s Path to a Gender- (Im)Balanced Growth: Reflections from the Post-Reform Eras (original) (raw)
Related papers
At the threshold of economic empowerment : women, work and gender regimes in Asia
RePEc: Research Papers in Economics, 2013
The International Labour Office welcomes such applications. Libraries, institutions and other users registered with reproduction rights organizations may make copies in accordance with the licences issued to them for this purpose. Visit www.ifrro.org to find the reproduction rights organization in your country. This paper benefited from very helpful comments and inputs provided by several anonymous reviewers as well as participants of the workshop on "Women's Labour force Participation in India and South Asia: Have Women Benefited from an Era of Globalization and Growth?" held in New Delhi on 14-15 February 2013. I would like to acknowledge the efforts of Sher Verick, who through a series of interactive discussions and constructive questioning helped me to address context specific challenges. My thanks are due to Dev Nathan, who as partner in life and otherwise, shared a feminist critique of conventional economic analysis. Ruchika Chaudhary and Gregory Rake drew my attention to some new relevant literature. During the writing of the monograph, Kamal Choudhury, Swati Sain Gupta and Jaya Lekshmi Nair helped me with their meticulous work on the transcripts and for handling much of the document processing as well as communications. I greatly appreciate their assistance in enabling me to complete the manuscript. I am indeed grateful to all of them for sharing their thoughts. Thanks to Sunaina Dalaya for editing the manuscript and strengthening the clarity of my arguments and ideas. Any errors are the sole responsibility of the author.
Gender implications of the “new” economic policy
Women's Studies International Forum, 1999
Synopsis-A major effect of globalization has been the opening up of the Indian economy for international trade. Economic reforms under the "New Structural Adjustment Programme" (1991) include the deregularisation of the economy to allow free market forces to operate unfettered. With increasing global economic competition, employment conditions have declined and government spending on social and welfare services has decreased. This article demonstrates the impact upon women, and how policy makers take for granted that the burden of social services can be "costlessly" transferred from the "productive" economy to the "non-productive" economy, that is, to women within the household. Women's multiple role in production and reproduction is negated by the absence of gender analysis in economic policy making. It is, therefore, necessary for feminists to identify the forces that continue to deconstruct and reconstruct patriarchy, and to investigate the interrelationships between public and private spheres, and social and economic capital.
What's macroeconomic policy got to do with gender inequality? Evidence from Asia
Global Social Policy, 2012
The World Bank’s focus on gender inequality and constraints faced by women in its flagship report, the World Development Report 2012, comes as a much-welcomed contribution to the scholarly and policy discourse on gender and development. Moreover, extensive efforts to disseminate the well-researched report across developing and industrialized regions is bound to give gender equality and women’s welfare some much needed attention from mainstream scholars and government officials who otherwise marginalize such issues. This comprehensive volume of gender-aware research and policy discussion suggests that the goal of gender integration in development policy, pursued by scholars and practitioners since the early 1970s, is now realized at the level of a premier international financial institution. The report’s concern with gender inequality stems from the World Bank’s recognition that gender equality can promote economic growth and is a worthy goal to pursue for both intrinsic and economic reasons. In the era of smart phones, smart cards, smart cars, and smart government programs, it is no surprise that the World Bank adopts the catchy phrase ‘gender-smart’ to highlight the economy-wide gains to be had from reducing gender inequities. That is, the potential productivity gains achieved by closing gender gaps will boost economic growth. Yet the report has emphasized some messages – especially those focused on the benefits of growth and the importance of micro-oriented policy reforms to address persistent inequities – at the expense of others, especially the complicit role of macroeconomic policy in aggravating gender inequalities in the market and in the home. The remainder of this essay gives greater prominence to these overlooked messages using evidence from Asia, a region known for gender inequities in health, assets, income, and unpaid work that have persisted despite several decades of export oriented growth.
Over the last four decades, as China has transitioned from a socialist centralized economy to a productivity-and-efficiency-oriented market economy, so too have the country’s public and private spheres become increasingly differentiated. Although others attribute changing gender inequality to the market transition, we draw from Chinese feminist critical analyses and propose a theoretical framework regarding how the two-sphere separation in contemporary China, embedded in how gender equality was organized in the socialist time, has been driven by the state and is further justified by changing gender ideologies. We review the existing literature and identify gaps in research on how women’s disadvantages in the public and private spheres—in the labor market and within the family—mutually reinforce each other in post-reform urban China. We also discuss how the dynamics of, and interactions between, the two spheres are justified by a changing gender ideology. Finally, by exploring gender inequality in the process of the two-sphere separation in a transitional context, we make an important contribution to the general sociological and gender literature.
Production processes and the gendering of industrial work in Asia
Asian Studies Review, 2000
In diverse historical contexts, women's entry into factory work has always evoked much debate among scholars and policy-makers alike. Ever since policy-makers focused their attention on the flow of cheap female and child labour into factories during Britain's Industrial Revolution, debate has centred on the effect of long hours and hard labour on workers' health and well-being. Concern focused on women workers in particular because they were seen as conduits to the well-being of future generations. Protective labour legislation was formulated in many western countries at the beginning of the twentieth century as part of a social reform movement concerned with the character and quality of future generations. Debate among feminist scholars, on the other hand, focused on the effects of capitalist industrialisation and particularly the emergence of factory production, wage labour and the separation of home and workplace on the sexual division of labour and women's status in economic development. These developments, together with the discriminatory legislation enacted by liberal reform movements and male-dominated trade unions in western Europe, were considered to have laid the foundations for the decline in women's economic role in productive life. With the onset of colonialism, ideas of social reform were also introduced into the European colonies. Such attempts to "protect" women manifested themselves not so much in the struggle for the family wage, as in the West, but in the educational system, in the setting up of women's training schools, and in the introduction of protective legislation for women .