Politicians and Political Parties’ Use of Social Media in-between Elections (original) (raw)
Related papers
Bread and Circuses" for the electorate: how political parties use social media to reach their voters
International Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities Invention, 2021
Elections are no longer imaginable without social media. This paper will examine how political parties use social media sites to engage with their voters. Furthermore, it will be investigated whether parties adhere to their own election programs on social media sites and whether a complex topic allocation is conducive or rather a hindrance.
Over the last fifty years, a gap has been growing in the UK between political institutions and the people they represent. Voter turnout continues to decline; mass membership of political parties, once the most important bridge between the people and the political elite, continues to fall; and trust in and contact with politicians is at a historic all-time low. At the same time, while fewer and fewer people are turning to conventional ways of making their voice heard, the use of social media for politics has exploded. This report outlines the emerging contours of political life online: who is doing it, for what ends and why. On the basis of new survey research, it also outlines the impact that digital politics is having on the political process, political engagement, and what it means for politicians. It argues that the rise of digital politics is signi cant for the future democratic health of the UK. A new opportunity has now opened to use social media not just to win political power, but to wield it better. Social media builds bridges between people and institutions, at a scale, and with an ease, that has never before been possible. It lays out some key principles for how digital politics can be harnessed to reverse decades-long trends of political disengagement: the importance of listening to the electorate and treating social media as a two-way street; the need to recognise new online groups and mobilisations, and the power they yield; the necessity of moving from online discussions to something that can contribute towards the political decisions that are taken; and the dangers of digital exclusion.
Democratic Process and Social Media: A Study of Us Presidential Election 2012
2013
Social media offers innovative opportunities for political actors, political institutions and the public to interact with one another. Drawing on examples from United States and the United Kingdom, this paper outlines how social media are currently being used in the political arena. In America, many parliamentarians have created accounts on popular sites such as Facebook, Twitter, Orkut, MySpace and Flickr. The content posted on these sites may relate to policy issues and the official work of politicians or to aspects of their personal lives. All four political parties represented in American Senate have accounts on Facebook, Twitter, MySpace and Flickr. Each party also has its own YouTube channel on which news clips, advertisements, and other video recordings related to the party and its officials are shared with the public. Links to these accounts are included on the official websites of each party, along with features that allow users to “bookmark” and share elements of the party...
Journal of Social and Political Sciences, 2021
The effect from COVID-19 pandemic has changed how presidential candidates do their political campaigns. The restriction to do social distancing makes the usual campaign not doable. That’s why presidential candidates need to find another way for their political campaign, which is by doing things digitally. This digitally driven changes can have its advantages and disadvantages. In this paper we discuss about the consequences of the changes in political campaigns in digital form or through social media for democratic societies in US presidential election. We use qualitative descriptive with case study method. In this paper we use secondary data such as research journals that’s related to this topic, documentation and articles. We find that the changes to digital campaigning have its own pros and cons that can affect how politicians do their campaigns on their social media platforms.
Journal of Social and Political Sciences, 2021
The effect from COVID-19 pandemic has changed how presidential candidates do their political campaigns. The restriction to do social distancing makes the usual campaign not doable. That's why presidential candidates need to find another way for their political campaign, which is by doing things digitally. This digitally driven changes can have its advantages and disadvantages. In this paper we discuss about the consequences of the changes in political campaigns in digital form or through social media for democratic societies in US presidential election. We use qualitative descriptive with case study method. In this paper we use secondary data such as research journals that's related to this topic, documentation and articles. We find that the changes to digital campaigning have its own pros and cons that can affect how politicians do their campaigns on their social media platforms.
The Social Media as a Transformative Agent in the Electoral Process
Journal of Government and Politics
The growing use of social media in social interaction has changed the mode of political campaign in the Philippines. It allowed a more aggressive citizen's participation in politics in a more efficient and asynchronous mode. This research sought to determine the influences of social media in the presidential preferences of netizens during the campaign period for the 2016 presidential elections in the Philippines. It also looked into the pattern of the preferences of respondents among the five presidential candidates for the 2016 presidential election.This research used Media Ecology Theory by Marshall McLuhan and Uses and Gratification Theory by Herbert Blumer as discursive approaches to understand the behaviour of social media users during the 2016 presidential campaign. Descriptive and qualitative analyses were used. Data gathering was through online questionnaire by using snowball sampling. A total of 289 respondents participated out of 1210 visitors of the link used by the researchers. The data gathering started on February 9, 2016, the start of the presidential campaign period and ended on March 27, 2016 or a total of 47 days. The timeline for data gathering was constrained by the time limit that was set for this study. The results show that social media has no strong influence in the preferences of respondents with only 44% of the respondents saying that their presidential preferences were influenced by social media. However, 75.6% of the respondents indicated that social media is a determining factor in the process of presidential campaign because it is an efficient media in communicating vital campaign information. The pattern of the preferences of respondents shows strong resemblance to some mock polls conducted by other groups in the Philippines during the campaign period. It is recommended to continue exploring the relevance of social media as a political tool for effective communication in politics and governance.
Social Media, Parties, and Political Inequalities
This book examines how social media have transformed politics in established democracies. Specifically, the authors examine the influence of the unique qualities of social media on the power balance between and within parties. They present a generaly theory as well as an in-depth case study of the Netherlands and compare it to the US and European democracies. the authors show how and why social media's introduction leads to equalization for some and normalization for others. Additional to national politics, Jacobs and Spierings investigate often-overlooked topics such as local and European politics and the impact on women and ethnic minorities. “Jacobs and Spierings are the first ones to provide a comprehensive account of the role social media play in politics. With their multi-method, comparative approach they debunk the common wisdom of massive social media effects, but also show in a nuanced way when and how these media actually matter. The book is a must-read for everyone wanting to understand how politics has changed due to the rise of new media.” - Rens Vliegenthart, Professor of Communication Science and Chair in Media and Society, University of Amsterdam, Netherlands “This book makes an important contribution to the literature on the internet and politics. In looking comparatively at elites’ use of Twitter and Facebook it extends our understanding of how far social media are affecting political practice in campaigns and elections worldwide. The authors update the standard normalization-equalization debate that has characterized the study of this topic by presenting a more nuanced understanding of party competition online.” - Rachel Gibson, Professor of Politics, University of Manchester, UK
Digital media as a driver of change in political organisation: 2010 and 2015 UK general elections
Media, Culture & Society
In Britain, by 2015, Web 2.0 had become a more widely accepted and established mode of civic engagement of which political e-participation became an observable extension. However, in the run-up to 2010, social media were newer, less understood and largely associated with younger generations. These changes present questions about how wider technocultural developments impacted political engagement between the 2010 and 2015 UK general elections. This article aims to go some way in examining this question with a theoretical focus on the role of Facebook as a driver of change in political organisation. Using the British Conservative Party as a case study, the article analyses and compares events, observations and shifting power relations associated with digital technology and organisational change observed over two election cycles spanning from 2005 to 2015. A focal aim is to examine changes in Conservative Party campaigns and organisation in order to contribute to wider debates about th...
Electronic Participation, 2011
Abstract. This paper presents the results of a literature review in regard to Social Media and participation. Besides that, to understand the meaning and impact of Social Media on elections, we show field results from the 2010 and 2011 elections in the Netherlands. There are several challenges when it comes to engaging people in party politics. The current findings in literature show us that previous efforts to shape public participation with prior Internet tools did not meet expectations. With Social Media this could change, because participation seems to be the key concept that explains the difference between ‘old’ web and ‘new’ Social Media. In the Netherlands, Social Media did not significantly influence voting behaviour during the local elections (2010/2011). But, during the national elections (2010), politicians with higher Social Media engagement got relatively more votes within most political parties. In conclusion, we propose a future research agenda to study how political parties could benefit from Social Media to reinvent and improve the way they work with their members and volunteers.