LEGAL IMPLICATIONS OF MEMBERS STATES FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH AN OBLIGATION TO NOTIFY AND/OR NOMINATE A BODY RESPONSIBLE TO PERFORM OBLIGATIONS PRESCRIBED BY A REGULATION (original) (raw)
Related papers
EU AND COMPARATIVE LAW ISSUES AND CHALLENGES
Jelena Ceranic, Marin Mrcela, Natasa Lucic, Aleksandra Visekruna, Tunjica Petrašević, Ágoston Mohay, Ana Knezevic Bojovic, Jelena Vukadinovic, Sanja Jelisavac Trosic, Kristina Miseva, Dunja Duic, Anita Blagojević
These Conference Proceedings are one of the last outputs of the Jean Monnet Chair in EU Procedural Law (reg. no. 553095-EPP-1-2014-1-HR-EPPJMO-CHAIR) that was granted to the Faculty of Law Osijek three years ago. The Jean Monnet Chair is funded by the European Commission in the framework of the Erasmus+ Programme with the aim of encouraging professors, students and professionals to teach and research EU law and especially EU procedural law. Symbolically, this conference marks the end of the Jean Monnet Chair in EU Procedural Law, but also the beginning of the EU and comparative law issues and challenges series that aspires to pursue the scientific idea conceived by Jean Monnet Chair projects.
PROVISIONAL MEASURES AND CHILD ABDUCTION PROCEEDING
Pravni vjesnik , 2019
The purpose of the established system of the proceedings in cases of international child abduction, as set out in the Hague Convention on Child Abduction, which has been strengthened, in relation to the EU Member States, by the provisions of the Brussels II bis Regulation, is to secure a prompt return of the child that has been wrongfully removed or retained to his/her Member State of origin. The return of the child must provide full protection of the child both in the state where the child was unlawfully resident and in the state where the child has to return. In these respect, the competent authorities have at their disposal legal mechanisms for provisional and protective measures provided for by the Brussels II bis Regulation and the Hague Convention on Measures for the Protection of Children. The possibility of taking these measures will depend on the national law of the state in question and on the specific circumstances of the case. In this paper, a legal framework will be presented for the imposition of provisional measures in cases of cross-border child abduction, which will be supported by the case law of the Court of Justice of the European Union. Case examples gathered under the project “Cross-border removal and retention of a child – Croatian practice and European expectations” will illustrate the difficulties encountered by the courts in the Republic of Croatia when it comes to applying the relevant provisions.
Family Property and Succession in EU Member States National Reports on the Collected Data, 2019
Marriage rates have declined over the past few decades in entire Europe. Rate of concluded marriages has been on the tree decade scale dropping in Hungary, lately the rate has increased and become stabile. Pluralization of family forms started in the middle of the 80’s. The changing structure of the economy, the broadening possibilities for enrolment in university, the growing career opportunities for both young men and women, on the one hand, and unemployment and growing inequalities, on the other hand, had some effect on family formations.
THE NON-CONTRACTUAL LIABILITY OF THE EU – CASE STUDY OF ŠUMELJ CASE
The EU is in obligation to cover the damage to member states and individuals on behalf of the institution that caused it. There is contractual and non-contractual liability of the EU. The aim of this paper is to discuss the non-contractual liability of the EU with special reference to joint liability of the EU and member states. In that sense, we will discuss the case “Šumelj and Others v Commission”, which is the first Croatian case before the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU). The action was brought before the General Court on 20 October 2013. The applicants claimed that the Commission had breached its obligation to monitor the implementation of the Treaty concerning the accession of the Republic of Croatia to the European Union, under Article 36 to the Act of Accession. The General Court recently issued a negative decision. The applicants lodged an appeal to the Court of Justice but the Court confirmed General Court’s decision. So, we analyse the judgment of the General Court.
EU AND COMPARATIVE LAW ISSUES AND CHALLENGES SERIES
This book contains research conducted by academics from EU Member States and candidate countries. Editors have selected research that represents ideas on the numerous aspects of criminal, commercial, civil, consumer protection, and judicial system, international, family, international private, administrative and constitutional law with focus on reconciliation, European ideas and values, and European Union law.
This paper is written as the Croatian National Report for the Intermediary Conference of the International Academy of Comparative Law on the topic of the conflict of laws conventions and their reception in national legal systems. It is beyond doubt that international unification efforts often inspire national legislators and vice versa. The same is true for the field of private international law. One of the certainly most influential set of international instruments is the body of conventions concluded under the auspices of the Hague Conference on Private International Law. Hence, the analysis here focuses on the Hague conventions, in particular those to which the Republic of Croatia is a party. On the other hand, the CIDIP conventions, also at the attention of the General Report, are per se not relevant to Croatia ; therefore they are not addressed in this Report. At the outset, this Report offers information on the status of the individual Hague conventions in the Republic of Croatia, as well as discusses the Croatian participation at the sessions organised by the Hague Conference. The next chapter deals with the interrelation at the substantive level between the conflicts conventions and domestic conflicts law, and attempts to identify the patterns in which the Hague conventions influence Croatian domestic conflicts rules. Further scrutinized is the issue of potential divergences between conflicts conventions and domestic law which, if they arise, are ordinarily resolved by virtue of the hierarchical order of legal instruments in the legal system in question. The final chapter is dedicated to a detailed analysis of the ways in which the Hague conventions are implemented in Croatia, as well as the ways in which they are applied in Croatian case law, with specific emphasis put on the child abduction cases.
Report on the Legal Regulation of Cultural Heritage in Croatia
The Croatian national report on the legal aspects of cultural heritage is written in the context of the HEURIGHT project – the Right to Cultural Heritage, its Protection and Enforcement through Cooperation in the European Union. This report offers an overview of the Croatian legal framework for cultural heritage, and researches into certain specific issues within this broad field. Throughout the pages various legal sources relevant for this purpose are being made reference to and analyzed where appropriate, including the constitutional provisions, multilateral and bilateral international treaties, EU legal sources and their implementation into the Croatian legal system, national laws and regulations (statutory provisions and by-laws) and pertinent case law of courts and administrative authorities.
This paper aims to look at the possibilities that regions have in the framework of the European Union. Regions are represented in the Union in an institutionalised way within the Committee of Regions. Although its powers are relatively limited, the Committee of Regions can provide input in the EU legislative process and present its views in various non-legislative opinions in order to influence European decision-making. We will assess the importance of the right of the Committee of Regions to initiate an action for annulment and its role in safeguarding subsidiarity since the entry into force of the Lisbon Treaty. The second part of the paper will deal with the direct representation and other possibilities of regions in the EU framework. The entering into force of the Lisbon Treaty improved the standing of regions and cities in the EU's political system. One of the important changes is that the local and regional right of self government is now, for the first time ever, enshrined in an EU Treaty. Direct representation of Osjecko-baranjska County, in Brussels, was founded in 2007, by the City of Osijek and Osjecko-baranjska County. The main objectives of the office in Brussels are to assure strong representation of the regional interests, to provide information about the on-going processes in Brussels and to establish horizontal connections with other regions and European Institutions. Since the office of Osjecka-Branjska County was founded prior to Lisbon changes, this paper will try to answer the question whether the Lisbon changes improved the process of direct representation.