Seeing like a city: eikôn and andrias in Hellenistic civic culture (original) (raw)

2016, Pharos

What is eikôn? Epigraphical examples accompanying actual ancient statues (notably a remarkable early Hellenistic dossier from Erythrai, concerning the statue of the tyrannicide Philitas) allow us to read the word in concept, as an image emanating from or produced by material means (the andrias). The workings of eikôn represent a body of civic thinking about art and images, that reflects the political culture of the Greek civic state. This com-munitarian connoisseurship determined production, appearance and reception of Hellenis-tic: if the actual works of this civic art of mostly lost, some playful variants or reactions to it allow us to capture some of its effect. Keywords statues-art history-visuality-civic culture-Hellenistic art-polis Mutilating and restoring the eikôn: Philitas of Erythrai Some time in the early Hellenistic period, the citizens of Erythrai decided to restore the statue of one Philitas, the tyrannicide. This work of civic art had been modified earlier, when the city was under the control of an oligarchical faction: apparently feeling under threat by the stance (stasis) of the statue, they had removed the sword which the figure wielded, thus changing the monument and neutralizing its threat. The democratic polis deliberated, investigated, and put the sword back in place, reestablishing its meaning. The moment is a striking example of an honorific statue, perhaps quite ancient, and its political force in a local, relational context, down in time; 1 we know of this statue through the official decision taken by the Erythraians, and inscribed on a stone slab set up next to the statue.

“The Beautiful Monument: The Aristocracy of Images in Athenian Funerary Sculpture (c. 530–480 BCE)”

Marion Meyer – Gianfranco Adornato (eds.), Innovations and Inventions in Athens c. 530 to 470 BCE – Two Crucial Generations,WIENER FORSCHUNGEN ZUR ARCHÄOLOGIE, Bd. 18, Phoibos Verlag, Wien 2020, 167-186. , 2020

The discoveries that have occurred over the last sixty years, together with chronological considerations and the appropriate evaluation of the epigraphic corpus, testify overall to the duration of the system of monumental funerary dedications well beyond the advent of democracy by Kleisthenes (508/7 BCE) and probably up to the end of the Persian Wars. This ‘longue durée’ will require the revision of the interpretation that mechanically links Archaic funerary monuments and the ruling “aristocracy” during pre-democratic political regimes in turn paving the way for a more detailed analysis of patronage. The monument is built according to precise rules of a visual rhetoric, aimed at enhancing its beauty, to match and reflect the excellence of the recipients – largely male and including impressive monuments for non-Athenians (xenoi) – and to define their social position through the joint devices of word and image. The evidence is discussed in detail, and the Author accepts the proposal that the grave statue of Aristodikos, one of the latest examples of the kouros type, wore a helmet. The head of a youth, found in the Kerameikos and likewise once equipped with a helmet might attest to the next “step”: a grave statue in ponderation. The monuments recovered from Piraeus Gate are discussed in detail, as well as Jeffery’s so-called Samian plot; a new interpreation of the bases with athletic scenes is proposed, highlightening the possible connection with Sparta and the Athenian pro-Lacedemonian party (sphairomachia) as well as the connection with Eretria and eastern Attica for the allusion to the Amarysia or to the Attic version of the event (the chariot scenes with hoplites). Concluding, funerary monuments reflect the changes in Athenian society, which in turn are largely influenced by the international situation.

Honorific Practices and the Politics of Space on Hellenistic Delos: Portrait Statue Monuments Along the Dromos

American Journal of Archaeology, 2013

The honorific statue landscape of Hellenistic cities and sanctuaries was constantly changing, but the process of the gradual accrual of statues is customarily elided on site plans, which tend to show––if they represent statue bases at all––the final phase of this long and complex process. Investigating the way these statue landscapes developed over time can provide a better understanding of the political, social, and spatial dynamics at play in portrait dedication. This article takes as a case study for such an approach the portrait statue monuments set up along the dromos of the Sanctuary of Apollo on Delos. Our aim is to unpack the processual dimension of this statuary display by representing this process visually through phase plans and a three-dimensional model of the dromos made in Trimble SketchUp. Parsing into phases the gradual accumulation of statues along the dromos reveals the historical dimension of statue dedication and exposes the tensions between individual and group identity that could be negotiated visually through the location, material, and size of a portrait monument. Finally, we argue that imaginative reconstruction can help us think through the implications of display context for sculptural style: the ever-increasing number of portrait statues in the Late Hellenistic period may have been a driving force behind the stylistic changes that occurred in Late Hellenistic portraiture.

2018. Figured Reliefs on Public Buildings: Memory and Civic Identity in Roman Achaia

Γλυπτική και κοινωνία στη ρωμαϊκή Ελλάδα: καλλιτεχνικά προϊόντα, κοινωνικές προβολές, 2018

The present paper examines figured reliefs that adorned some of the public buildings of Roman Greece. Most of such reliefs have been found either in Roman colonies, or in cities and centres that had developed strong links with Rome and whose importance was often crucial for Roman politics in this area. They usually display mythological subjects and seem to refer to legendary times, alluding to old traditions and past glories. Besides some observations of a stylistic nature, issues regarding the meaning of these reliefs in their display context will be the main focus of the paper. It will be argued that they not only played a central role in stressing civic identity, but were also intended to preserve a shared Greek memory at a time when political autonomy was lost and new stylistic patterns and ideological models were being imported from outside by the new Roman rulers.

Loading...

Loading Preview

Sorry, preview is currently unavailable. You can download the paper by clicking the button above.