The ontological woman: A history of deauthentication, dehumanization, and violence (original) (raw)
Trans-exclusionary radical feminists (TERFs) make use of an ethical, moralistic framework to support specific rhetoric and behavior. Taken together, these form a self-referential ideology that functions to protect an essentialist ontology, which reliably harms cisgender, transgender, and feminist communities. Through an examination of the historical record of US radical feminist and TERF discourses, including first-hand accounts, this article considers how the ontological framework that inspires TERF rhetoric and behavior has functioned as a cycle of moral fulfillment, even as it necessitates the eradication of trans bodies. The article analyzes how TERF morality, rhetoric, and action construct social forms through a sexed binary by relying on an appeal to the natural, which serves to objectify ontological embodiment. It also foregrounds the different historical and contemporary positionalities of trans-exclusionary and trans-inclusive radical feminisms, and concludes with a reminder of the complementary attributes of trans feminism and radical feminism that are evidenced by decades of cooperation.
Related papers
The anti-feminism of anti-trans feminism
European Journal of Women's Studies, 2023
Trans-exclusionary feminists are using the trope of ‘protecting women’ as their main weapon while accusing trans-inclusive feminisms of misogyny. It is a rhetorical figure that we can call ‘the weaponization of accusations of violence’. And we witness it as a strategy cutting across many contexts, for example, blanket accusations of anti-Semitism against anti-Zionists, accusations of Hinduphobia to shut down resistance against Hindutva, and accusations of misogyny and sexual violence against transfeminism or trans-inclusive feminism. In this article, I discuss such accusations of violence together with examples that demonstrate that they often come with an absolute incapacity to conceive of the most basic intersectional analysis. I argue that trans-exclusionary feminism is getting the very paradigms of what misogyny is and what kind of intersectional, transnational feminisms are needed to fight it, completely wrong. With this, anti-trans feminism reveals itself to be inherently anti-feminist. We are currently witnessing a supernational unification of far right, centrist and leftist agents using anti-gender, anti-feminist and transphobic mobilisations, populist affects and strategic disinformation as accelerators for hateful and anti-democratic agendas. Ultimately, this leads to a consolidation of the global shift to the right.
Radical Inclusion: Recounting the Trans Inclusive History of Radical Feminism
This article reviews the ways in which radical feminism has been and continues to be trans inclusive. Trans inclusive radical feminist opinion leaders, groups, and events are reviewed and contrasted against a popular media narrative that asserts that radical feminism takes issue with trans people. Reviewed are historical instances in which radical feminists braved violence to ensure their feminism was trans inclusive.
Trans and Feminist Theoretical Interactions
The subject of passing has been a key issue within feminist debates about trans. ‘Many of the earliest non-trans feminist perspectives on transsexuals were marked by hostility’ (Bettcher, 2009), and this was, at least in part, due to the apparent reinforcement of gender roles that passing trans individuals ¬engage with. Such a view may be seen most emphatically in radical feminist Janice Raymond’s text The Transsexual Empire (1980). Bettcher notes that ‘Raymond’s position is underwritten by a substrate view about sex according to which sex exists as a given prior to the machinations of culture’ (Bettcher, 2009), a position that has since been largely, in many cases, replaced by Butler’s notion of performativity. Third wave feminism's dismissal of the concept of female essentiality and its subsequent renunciation of the gender binary that led to poststructuralist views and the development of queer theory has also led to the disavowal of many of Raymond’s arguments. However, Penny notes that ‘[t]he institutional misogyny of the global psychiatric establishment is something that radical feminists and trans activists can usefully oppose together’, as a way of overcoming the fact that ‘“trans liberation” and “feminism” have often been cast as opposing movements’ (in Heyes, 2003, p.1094) and to bring intersecting communities together. This paper will look at the ways in which trans identity and feminism have intersected, how the views of radical and intersectional feminists’ opinions differ on the topic of trans and the emerging field of trans-feminism.
Philosophical Problems With the Gender-Critical Feminist Argument Against Trans Inclusion
SAGE Open
The Reform of the Gender Recognition Act: Government Consultation (2018) catalyzed a heated debate on transgender rights and trans inclusion in the United Kingdom. I start by explaining what the reforms to the U.K. system of gender recognition propose, why gender-critical feminists oppose them, and how other feminist academics have responded to their arguments. I then offer a more detailed philosophical critique of gender-critical trans-exclusionary feminist arguments. I argue that the gender-critical feminist case against trans women’s access to women-only (or sex-segregated, or single-sex) spaces suffers from a number of fallacies, and introduces modes of argument that are at odds with well-established and sound uses of practical reason. I try to make sense of these problems with gender-critical feminist thought by appealing to the idea of presupposed paranoid structuralism. I also argue that gender-critical feminists’ enthusiastic use of social media and allied online platforms m...
Loading Preview
Sorry, preview is currently unavailable. You can download the paper by clicking the button above.