Six policy intervention points for sustainability transitions: A conceptual framework and a systematic literature review (original) (raw)
Recent literature has turned considerable attention to the role of policy mixes in shaping socio-technical systems towards sustainability. However, the identification of relevant policy intervention points has remained a relatively neglected topic. This is a potentially significant oversight given that such intervention points constitute a mid-step between means (particular policy instruments) and overall goals (change in the directionality of socio-technical systems). By complementing existing work on policy mixes with additional insights from transitions literature, this paper formulates a conceptual framework of six policy intervention points for transformative systems change. The coding scheme developed on the basis of this framework is used to review current literature on policy mixes in sustainability transitions. It is shown that the latter has so far primarily focused on niche-regime dynamics while largely neglecting the broader context of these interactions. We argue that adopting a wider perspective on intervention points can aid future work on policy mixes by enabling the identification of root causes and critical problems of ongoing transitions, and to spot gaps in existing policy activities. The case of the Estonian energy system is used to briefly illustrate these possibilities. Methodologically, we demonstrate the value of combining theory-based concept-formation with a systematic literature review, enabling not only a provision of a summary of existing literature but also highlighting systematic gaps in that literature.
Sign up for access to the world's latest research
checkGet notified about relevant papers
checkSave papers to use in your research
checkJoin the discussion with peers
checkTrack your impact
Sign up for access to the world's latest research
Related papers
Sustainability transition dynamics: Towards overcoming policy resistance
Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 2016
Sustainability transitions receive major scholarly attention, often explicitly with the intention to develop policy recommendations aimed towards progressing such transitions. Despite these efforts, many implemented transition policies have not been able to meet expectations. This tendency of systems to defeat the policies that have been designed to improve them is known as 'policy resistance'. This paper addresses the question how we can explain the persistence of policy resistance in the context of sustainability transitions, and aims to bring us a step further in the direction of identifying policies that support overcoming policy resistance. System dynamics is an approach that explicitly addresses policy resistance and we investigate how this approach complements existing transition approaches. As an illustration, we apply the approach to the case of the Dutch energy transition, with the participation of 96 experts. We conclude that system dynamics complements the dominant multi-level perspective and the transition management approach by providing a middle ground between emphasizing agency or structure. Moreover, the approach helps overcoming policy resistance by mapping out the structure of the system responsible for policy resistance, thereby enabling the identification of high leverage points that support sustainability transitions.
Lessons from the past for sustainability transitions? A meta-analysis of socio-technical studies
To break away from techno-institutional lock-in in climate change and in other sustainability problems, many have focused on innovation in technological 'niches'. The destabilisation of the incumbent 'regime' has been neglected and external 'landscape' pressures under-analysed. With this in mind, this article examines the factors of regime destabilisation and forms of regime resistance in past technological transitions in energy and transport. It analyses 23 energy (electricity, heat & chemicals) and 11 transport (drive chain, networks, fuels & land planning) transitions pre-1990. Furthermore, in order to properly frame these results and make any "lessons from the past" applicable to the present, this article includes an assessment of current sustainability trends. The key lessons from past energy transitions are that regime outsiders with the right ideology and influence on the market can destabilise the energy sector, which has traditionally had strong incumbents. As incumbents are weakened, past transport transitions show that further change may come from emphasising the Health and Lifestyle benefits of sustainability transitions.
Over the last years a fast growing literature developed around the notion of sociotechnical systems and the possibilities for governing such systems towards sustainability . Such large scale, structural changes in socio-technical systems have been described as multi-level transitions (Geels 2002). The government is assumed to play an important role in helping these necessary changes to happen. In this paper we argue that the transitions literature so far has underestimated political obstacles to governing transitions. In particular the transitions literature has under-conceptualised landscape level factors. We argue that the work on policy paradigms within political science (Hall 1993) is extremely useful to understand some of the macro-political constraints. The main point we are making is that policy paradigms shape what kinds of interventions are seen as politically acceptable and thereby influence the governance of transitions. The empirical case discussed in this paper to illustrate this argument is the transition towards a more sustainable energy system in the UK.
2018
Transitions management identifies broad national efforts that attempt to govern socio-technical change along more environmentally sustainable pathways. Although the complexity of such endeavours is generally acknowledged, it is not yet clear how governance practices work at an international level. This paper utilises the transitions management concept to compare three countries in their attempts to increase the adoption and use of renewable energy technologies. It notes that analysis at a micro-level needs to focus on the actions and requirements of particular user groups for a deeper elucidation of transition management processes. Furthermore, the complexity of socio-technical change processes implies that transitions management is a more useful concept when focused at the micro-level of change rather than at the macro-level of strategy formulation over the longer term.
Innovation and Institutional Change - The Transition to a Sustainable Electricity System
Industrialised societies, and especially energy and transport systems, are addicted to fossil fuels. The emergence and shape of these systems is inextricably linked to the exploitation of fossil resources such as coal, oil and gas. Apart from local and regional environmental problems, carbon emissions through fossil fuel burning have created the problem of human-induced global warming. The nature of the global warming problem is unprecedented: it threatens fundamental aspects of ecosystems and society in decades to come. The required response will be unprecedented as well: one element is that it demands fundamental transformation of existing systems of production and consumption away from its carbon base; another element is that it demands alternative forms of governance stretching from the local to the global. This book focuses on the electricity sector as a key system in the change towards a carbon-lean and sustainable society. The main purpose is to gain understanding in the way the interaction between technological and institutional changes may offset processes towards systems change, and the way these processes may be directed towards sustainability. The focus is on explaining relative success and failure of alternative practices and paths in the Dutch electricity system. This is done against the backdrop of the existing sociotechnical system for electricity and its established modes of production, coordination, and provision, and in relation to broader institutional arrangements for knowledge generation, economic exchange, policy and regulation, and societal legitimacy. Two relative successful paths are reviewed in depth: decentral cogeneration and green electricity. Both cases point at the importance of interlocking of changes in institutional arrangements in the electricity sector and broader political and societal structures to create the foundation for the alternative practices. Momentum was gained as a range of actor groups became mobilised along a newly emerging institutional logics. The cases also underlined the difficulty to maintain these logics on a sustainable path involving fundamental change of systems of production and consumption. A final chapter draws lessons for transition policy.
International Journal of Sustainable Development, 2012
In this concluding editorial, we present the central observations regarding the theoretical, empirical and methodological explorations of the various articles that make up this special issue on the governability of societal transitions towards sustainability. We elaborate on the specific contributions of each article to the governance of sustainability transitions and the transition management approach and identify interesting similarities and differences between the various articles. Next, we revisit the guiding questions we N. Frantzeskaki et al. formulated in the introductory editorial, and we answer these questions by synthesising the contributions of the eight articles regarding:
Loading Preview
Sorry, preview is currently unavailable. You can download the paper by clicking the button above.