Platforms' Governance: Analyzing Digital Platforms' Policy Preferences (original) (raw)

Abstract

Growing political distrust in digital platforms has galvanized policy debates about how to best address issues associated with their market power and ad-run business models—including the proliferation of misinformation, privacy threats, and electoral interference. The range of proposed solutions includes growing calls for public-private policy regimes, such as co-regulation. Such proposals envision a role for digital platforms in addressing platform-related problems, whose contours need to be defined. In this article, we examine how platform companies attempt to influence these debates and define this role, focusing on the biggest U.S. digital platform companies: Amazon, Apple, Google, Facebook, and Microsoft. We conduct a content analysis of a sample of 2019 public policy blogs, statements, and testimonies by key personnel at these companies to gain insight into (a) the policy issues they engage, (b) the policy preferences they communicate, and (c) what these communications reveal about their regulatory philosophies and visions of platform governance. The findings shed light on the politics underlying the debates over platform governance and provide insight into what co-regulatory approaches might look like in practice. We call these policy paradigms “frictionless regulation”: light and narrow regulatory oversight confined to baseline standard-setting, receptive to the private sector’s ongoing feedback, and prioritizing fast responsiveness to market needs over the slow and deliberative responsiveness to the public that is typical of democratic governance.

Figures (3)

Loading...

Loading Preview

Sorry, preview is currently unavailable. You can download the paper by clicking the button above.

References (67)

  1. Ananny, Mike, and Tarleton Gillespie. 2016. "Public Platforms: Beyond the Cycle of Shocks and Exceptions." In IPP2016 The Platform Society. http://blogs.oii.ox.ac.uk/ipp- conference/sites/ipp/files/documents/anannyGillespie-publicPlatforms-oii- submittedSept8.pdf.
  2. Apple. 2019. "Qualcomm and Apple Agree to Drop All Litigation." Apple Newsroom (blog). April 16, 2019. https://www.apple.com/newsroom/2019/04/qualcomm-and-apple-agree-to- drop-all-litigation/.
  3. Arun, Chinmayi. 2020. "The Facebook Oversight Board: An Experiment in Self-Regulation." Just Security (blog). May 6, 2020. https://www.justsecurity.org/70021/the-facebook- oversight-board-an-experiment-in-self-regulation/.
  4. Australian Competition & Consumer Commission. 2019. "Digital Platforms Inquiry: Final Report." Canberra: Australian Competition & Consumer Commission. https://www.accc.gov.au/system/files/Digital%20platforms%20inquiry%20- %20final%20report.pdf.
  5. Bossetta, Michael. 2020. "Scandalous Design: How Social Media Platforms' Responses to Scandal Impacts Campaigns and Elections." Social Media + Society 6 (2): 1-4. https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305120924777.
  6. Braman, Sandra. 2011. "The Framing Years: Policy Fundamentals in the Internet Design Process, 1969-1979." The Information Society 27 (5): 295-310.
  7. Brill, Julie. 2019. "Microsoft Will Honor California's New Privacy Rights throughout the United States." Microsoft on the Issues (blog). November 11, 2019. https://blogs.microsoft.com/on-the-issues/2019/11/11/microsoft-california-privacy- rights/.
  8. Broockman, David E., Greg F. Ferenstein, and Neil A. Malhotra. 2017. "Wealthy Elites' Policy Preferences and Economic Inequality: The Case of Technology Entrepreneurs. Stanford University Graduate School of Business Research Paper No. 17-61. Available at SSRN: Https://Ssrn.Com/Abstract=3032688," September.
  9. Cammaerts, Bart, and Robin Mansell. 2020. "Digital Platform Policy and Regulation: Toward a Radical Democratic Turn." International Journal of Communication 14 (2020): 134-54.
  10. Chandresakaran, Rajiv, and John Mintz. 1999. "Microsoft's Window of Influence." The Washington Post (blog). May 7, 1999. https://www.washingtonpost.com/archive/politics/1999/05/07/microsofts-window-of- influence/424f0b28-e86c-42cf-a4c8-cb2db173715d/.
  11. Clegg, Nick. 2019. "Breaking Up Facebook Is Not the Answer." The New York Times (blog). May 11, 2019. https://www.nytimes.com/2019/05/11/opinion/facebook-nick-clegg-chris- hughes.html.
  12. Cole, Adam. 2020. "Google and Amazon Are Now in the Oil Business." Vox (blog). January 3, 2020. https://www.vox.com/recode/2020/1/3/21030688/google-amazon-ai-oil-gas.
  13. Cunnane, Yvonne, and Nikhil Shanbhag. 2019. "Why We Disagree With the Bundeskartellamt." Facebook Newsroom (blog). February 7, 2019. https://about.fb.com/news/2019/02/bundeskartellamt-order/.
  14. DeNardis, Laura. 2014. The Global War for Internet Governance. New Haven: Yale University Press.
  15. DeNardis, Laura, and Andrea M. Hackl. 2015. "Internet Governance by Social Media Platforms." Telecommunications Policy 39 (9): 761-70. https://doi.org/dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.telpol.2015.04.003i.
  16. Dijck, Jose van, Thomas Poell, and Martijn de Waal. 2018. The Platform Society: Public Values in a Connective World. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
  17. Facebook. 2019a. "A Conversation with Jonathan Zittrain on the Future of Technology in Society." Facebook Newsroom (blog). February 20, 2019. https://about.fb.com/wp- content/uploads/2019/02/transcript_zuckerberg_zittrain.pdf.
  18. ---. 2019b. "Combating Hate and Extremism." Facebook Newsroom (blog). September 17, 2019. https://about.fb.com/news/2019/09/combating-hate-and-extremism/.
  19. ---. 2019c. "Mark Zuckerberg Stands for Voice and Free Expression." Facebook Newsroom (blog). October 17, 2019. https://about.fb.com/news/2019/10/mark-zuckerberg-stands- for-voice-and-free-expression/.
  20. ---. 2019d. "A Conversation with Mark Zuckerberg, Patrick Collison and Tyler Cowen." Facebook Newsroom (blog). November 25, 2019. https://about.fb.com/wp- content/uploads/2019/11/Progress-Challenge-Transcript.pdf.
  21. Fay, Robert. 2019. "Digital Platforms Require a Global Governance Framework." In Models for Platform Governance, 27-31. Centre for International Governance Innovation.
  22. Fischer, Frank. 2003. Reframing Public Policy: Discursive Politics and Deliberative Practices. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
  23. Flew, Terry. 2016. "National Media Regulations in an Age of Convergent Media: Beyond Globalisation, Neo-Liberalism and Internet Freedom Theories." In Global Media and National Policies: The Return of the State, edited by Terry Flew, Petros Iosifidis, and Jeanette Steemers, 75-91. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.
  24. ---. 2018. "Platforms on Trial." Intermedia 46 (2): 24-29.
  25. ---. 2019a. "The Platformized Internet: Issues for Internet Law and Policy." Journal of Internet Law 22 (11): 3-16.
  26. ---. 2019b. "Digital Communication, the Crisis of Trust, and the Post-Global." Communication Research and Practice 5 (1): 4-22. https://doi.org/10.1080/22041451.2019.1561394.
  27. Flew, Terry, Fiona Martin, and Nicolas Suzor. 2019. "Internet Regulation as Media Policy: Rethinking the Question of Digital Communication Platform Governance." Journal of Digital Media & Policy 10 (1): 33-50. https://doi.org/10.1386/jdmp.10.1.33\_1.
  28. Frank, John. 2019. "Paris Call: Growing Consensus on Cyberspace." Microsoft on the Issues (blog). November 12, 2019. https://blogs.microsoft.com/on-the- issues/2019/11/12/paris-call-consensus-cyberspace/.
  29. Freedman, Des. 2012. "Outsourcing Internet Regulation." In Misunderstanding the Internet, edited by James Curran, Natalie Fenton, and Des Freedman, 95-120. New York, NY: Routledge.
  30. Fung, Brian. 2020. "Facebook Exec Admits There Is a 'trust Deficit' as Advertiser Boycott Accelerates." CNN Business (blog). June 24, 2020. https://www.cnn.com/2020/06/24/tech/facebook-trust-deficit/index.html.
  31. Gillespie, Tarleton. 2010. "The Politics of 'Platforms.'" New Media & Society 12 (3): 347-64. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444809342738.
  32. ---. 2017. "Governance of and by Platforms." In Sage Handbook of Social Media. Sage.
  33. ---. 2018. Custodians of the Internet: Platforms, Content Moderation, and the Hidden Decisions That Shape Social Media. Yale University Press.
  34. Gorwa, Robert. 2019a. "Regulating Them Softly." In Models for Platform Governance, 39-43. Centre for International Governance Innovation.
  35. ---. 2019b. "What Is Platform Governance?" Information, Communication & Society, 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2019.1573914.
  36. Gouri, Geeta, and Michael A. Salinger. 2017. "Protecting Competition versus Protecting Competitors: Assessing the Antitrust Complaints against Google." Criterion Journal on Innovation 2: 531-58.
  37. Hogan, Mél. 2015. "Data Flows and Water Woes: The Utah Data Center." Big Data & Society 2 (2): 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951715592429.
  38. Holt, Jennifer. 2011. Empires of Entertainment : Media Industries and the Politics of Deregulation, 1980-1996. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
  39. Hunter, Fergus, and Jennifer Duke. 2019. "'Not Messing around': Government Unveils 'world- Leading' Regulation of Tech Giants." The Sydney Morning Herald (blog). December 12, 2019. https://www.smh.com.au/politics/federal/morrison-government-unveils-world- leading-privacy-competition-regulation-of-tech-giants-20191212-p53j8r.html.
  40. Iosifidis, Petros, and Leighton Andrews. 2019. "Regulating the Internet in a Post-Truth World: Beyond Media Policy?" International Communication Gazette, February. https://doi.org/10.1177/1748048519828595.
  41. Khan, Lina. 2017. "Amazon's Antitrust Paradox." Yale Law Journal 126: 710-805.
  42. ---. 2019. "The Separation of Platforms and Commerce." Columbia Law Review 119 (4): 973-1098.
  43. Klonick, Kate. 2017. "The New Governors: The People, Rules, and Processes Governing Online Speech." Harvard Law Review 131: 1598-1670.
  44. Krämer, Jan, and Michael Wohlfarth. 2018. "Market Power, Regulatory Convergence, and the Role of Data in Digital Markets." Telecommunications Policy 42 (2): 154-71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.telpol.2017.10.004.
  45. Kreiss, Daniel, and Shannon C. McGregor. 2017. "Technology Firms Shape Political Communication: The Work of Microsoft, Facebook, Twitter, and Google With Campaigns During the 2016 U.S. Presidential Cycle." Political Communication, 1-23. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2017.1364814.
  46. Levina, Marina, and Amy Adele Hasinoff. 2017. "The Silicon Valley Ethos: Tech Industry Products, Discourses, and Practices." Television & New Media 18 (6): 489-95. https://doi.org/10.1177/1527476416680454.
  47. Morozov, Evgeny. 2014. To Save Everything, Click Here: The Folly of Technological Solutionism. New York, NY: PublicAffairs.
  48. Mosco, Vincent. 2017. Becoming Digital: Toward a Post-Internet Society. Bingley, UK: Emerald Publishing.
  49. Musiani, Francesca. 2013. "Dangerous Liaisons? Governments, Companies and Internet Governance." Internet Policy Review 2 (1): 1-7. https://doi.org/10.14763/2013.1.108.
  50. Napoli, Philip M. 2015. "Social Media and the Public Interest: Governance of News Platforms in the Realm of Individual and Algorithmic Gatekeepers." Telecommunications Policy 39 (9): 751-60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.telpol.2014.12.003.
  51. Napoli, Philip M., and Robyn Caplan. 2017. "Why Media Companies Insist They're Not Media Companies, Why They're Wrong, and Why It Matters." First Monday 22 (5).
  52. Park, Sora, Caroline Fisher, Jee Young Lee, Kieran McGuiness, Yoonmo Sang, Mathieu O'Neil, Michael Jensen, Kerry McCallum, and Glen Fuller. 2020. "Digital News Report: Australia 2020." Canberra: News & Media Research Centre, University of Canberra. https://www.canberra.edu.au/research/faculty-research-centres/nmrc/digital-news- report-australia-2020.
  53. Park, Yong Jin, Yoonmo Sang, Hoon Lee, and S. Mo Jones-Jang. 2019. "The Ontology of Digital Asset after Death: Policy Complexities, Suggestions and Critique of Digital Platforms." Digital Policy, Regulation and Governance 22 (1): 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1108/DPRG- 04-2019-0030.
  54. Perotti, Elena. 2017. "Google's Antitrust Woes Around the World." SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3060298.
  55. Picard, Robert G., and Victor Pickard. 2017. "Essential Principles for Contemporary Media and Communications Policymaking." Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism: University of Oxford.
  56. Pichai, Sundar. 2020. "Why Google Thinks We Need to Regulate AI." The Financial Times (blog). January 20, 2020. https://www.ft.com/content/3467659a-386d-11ea-ac3c- f68c10993b04.
  57. Poell, Thomas, David Nieborg, and José van Dijck. 2019. "Platformisation." Internet Policy Review 8 (4): 1-13. https://doi.org/10.14763/2019.4.1425.
  58. Popiel, Pawel. 2018. "The Tech Lobby: Tracing the Contours of New Media Elite Lobbying Power." Communication, Culture and Critique 11 (4): 566-85. https://doi.org/10.1093/ccc/tcy027.
  59. Smith, Brad, and Carole Ann Browne. 2019. "Tech Firms Need More Regulation." The Atlantic (blog). September 2019. https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/2019/09/please- regulate-us/597613/.
  60. Srnicek, Nick. 2017. Platform Capitalism. Cambridge, UK: Polity.
  61. Teachout, Zephyr, and Lina Khan. 2014. "Market Structure and Political Law: A Taxonomy of Power." Duke Journal of Constitutional Law & Public Policy 9 (1): 37-74.
  62. Turner, Fred. 2006. From Counterculture to Cyberculture: Stewart Brand, the Whole Earth Network, and the Rise of Digital Utopianism. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  63. Walker, Kent. 2019a. "How We're Supporting Smart Regulation and Policy Innovation in 2019." The Keyword | Google (blog). January 8, 2019. https://blog.google/perspectives/kent- walker-perspectives/principles-evolving-technology-policy-2019/.
  64. ---. 2019b. "Oversight Frameworks for Content-Sharing Platforms." The Keyword | Google (blog). June 19, 2019. https://www.blog.google/outreach-initiatives/public- policy/oversight-frameworks-content-sharing-platforms/.
  65. Wheeler, Tom. 2020. "COVID-19 Has Taught Us the Internet Is Critical and Needs Public Interest Oversight." Brookings (blog). April 29, 2020. https://www.brookings.edu/blog/techtank/2020/04/29/covid-19-has-taught-us-the- internet-is-critical-and-needs-public-interest-oversight/.
  66. Zuboff, Shoshana. 2019. The Age of Surveillance Capitalism: The Fight for a Human Future at the Frontier of Power. New York, NY: Public Affairs.
  67. Zuckerberg, Mark. 2019. "Mark Zuckerberg: The Internet Needs New Rules. Let's Start in These Four Areas." The Washington Post (blog). March 30, 2019. https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/mark-zuckerberg-the-internet-needs-new-