A Victorian Carol Book Popular Selections from the 19 th Century Suggested from the contents of hymnals and carol collections of the Era (original) (raw)
Diller, Carmen/Mulzer, Martin/Ólason, Kristinn (Hg.), „Erforsche mich, Gott, und erkenne mein Herz!“. Beiträge zur Syntax, Sprechaktanalyse und Metaphorik im Alten Testament (FS Hubert Irsigler zum 60. Geburtstag) (ATSAT 76), St. Ottilien: EOS, 2005, 37-60
Sing a new song: English and Scottish metrical psalmody from 1549‐1640
2011
I call on the Lord Jesus Christ 8.8.8.8. Of mercy yit he passis all LM We suld into remembrance 8.6.8.? Hay let vs sing LM In burgh and land 8.8.8.8. We suld beleue in God abufe CM The grace of God appeiris now LM Of thingis twa I pray the Lord LM Lord Father, God, that gaif me lyfe LM Blis, blissit God, thir giftis gude DLM Blissing goir, wisdome, and hartly thankfulnes 11.
'Come and Chaunt our Betas Praise': The Queen and the Elizabethan Verse Miscellanies
Multidisciplinary studies in language and literature English, American and Canadian : in memoriam Gudelia Rodríguez Sánchez "and ælc mann þe wisdom lufaþ biþ ge-sælig", 2008
'([¿61 foleuod¡ e,ma8 eql uo qde:?ouour e,rtsueqe:duroc ,{iuo aqt.+oJoq]nlr 'foreuro¿ qleqr?zlla puE (s0€ pue s0¿ áq] ur uo.+Je leuollpá e,ttsse:durr slq qlLt\) sulllod JepfH elE sIJoA\ eseqt }o luelussess¿eJ erl] ol pue ,{:oaq1 srqt ol slolnqlJluoc ulutu eql ,(leJns r '.uo)qaH spuDlsug Jo saruunrSúz {o sraó\oll ur sE) .{llun JtlBIUeql Jo sIJeuaS :suor]3elloc Jreql Jo ]ueluoJ 3ql esoqc sJolipe eql eldlJuud lBq,\\ ,(q uJoJSIp louuEc a,\\ .(ilEnsí] 'uorlJslloc qoea elnlllsuoJ lBt{l stueod el{l Jo eJIoqJ eql uI eJueJetlocul tueJBddE er{l :^r s{JoA\ eseql Jo ,(pn1s eqi sJsdurELI leql sJol3eI eql .+o euo 'srlosueJ el{l uteldxe ,(¡p,raq ueJ e,\\ q8noql 'I qleqezrTg Jo uSreJ eI{] ol enbrun sE ueos e.re ,(eql '1e.('puu lueql ueo,^ §leq sse;8oJd ,(reuor1n1o,te ue uBISep ol llnJII.+Ip.{lsnotrolou sI lI r'sleloqcs Jolsru,{q erue8qns E peleprsuoJ eru ,(eql IIIIS puB 'slapEeJ Jo alJJrc a^isnlcxs lsotu eql ol ecuolpne :elndod aql Iuol¡ Jo 'uolluoluoc p-tolsed aql ol uoqipeJl IeJISSEIJ eql urorJ'secerd perpunq e3Jql eql o] xIS 3t{l ruo4 oSuuJ sueod sITO)nq puu sruerSrcie 'scu,(1 a^ol 'spEIIEq ¡o sSurlpunq esoqJ 'tueql Jo uolldlJcsep o^llcellor 1? ,\\Brp ol uuql uortrpBr aqt ot 8ul8uoloq stxet eqt elererunue ol reISBe sl il'(9 Il:tL6f) slurpu ,(o;eruo¿ qlequzlTg se 'lue]xe etuos oJ 'erue8 eql ¡o selJupunoq el{l Jo uoueullap e elqrssodtut lsorul€ se¡€uI slxel eseql Suoruu socuolpnE Jo sasodlnd 'seJnlcnJls Jo ,(ter¡e¡, eql :suelqoJd Áueru sllulua ,(uu1¡acsru uBqloqezliE oq].]o uolllugep aq¿ 'crlqnd ,,fuu¡odueluoc eqt ,(q peruqs ¡ou ,{1e1rur1ep se,l. (1 ¿-777 :Vg6) sr,\\el 'S'J ¡o lesre.rddu ..qurp,, eq] :eurt tut{t iB e;ue8 Suqstrnog B ere,{\ serul?llecsnu esJe.{ leq} ocul^a sleod re1e1 uo aJuongul polseJlul?tu oq} pulr suolllpe Jo Jequnu eiq¿{JElUeJ al{l lng 'sJnlEJalII ,(rnluac-qlueoixIs uI uoueruoueqd lelueruupunJ sqt slce13au uago 'peqstlqnd era,t .(eql qcrq,u uI rulo.I paluud IBuISIJo eqt 3ur,to11o¡ Jo pBelsut 'sJoqlne oql Jo elx¿u aI{] Jopun srueod T eSue¡.ree¡ o1 .(cuapuel rng 'porred ueqtoquztlg eql uI pBLI soluellelsru crraod H luql ,lr¡ulndod eqt puelsJepun ol llncgJlp sr ]r e,r.tlcedsrad u;epour rno ruor¡-f n)uoutDl0S ap pDp lsJailu n ocaJYuxvJ odJSVJ-IEnNVtr l NYn[ sirrNVT'raJSrIAI ssdg^ NVHJEBVZT-11SHI cNV Nasno AHJ :,,aslvdd svJEg uno J]{ilvHJ aNV str\trOJ,, 184 JLTAN MANUEL CASTRO CARRACEDO respectively) seldom resolves the problem, and the prefatory statements, present in most miscellanies, rarely offer any useful clue. That is rvhy to find a new feature which may help to explain the editor's selections is highly vaiuable, and this is the principal aim of the following analysis of the praise poems addressed to the Queen in the miscellanies. Encomiastic or praise poetry is not very common in anthological subgenres. The distance of time, occasion and, sometimes, anonymity, inherent to these collections, impoverishes the adulatclry function so editors realised that it rvas useless to include compliments in their anthologies when they could hardiy reach their aims. Most of the compositions listed on the miscellanies were chosen on the basis of their aesthetic value, r,vithout further consideration to their eulogistic force, and that reduces their possibilities greatly: these poems often sacrif,ce part of their artistic quality for the sake of celebration, with a fixed set of rules and hackneyed conventions (Gwynfor i989: 37). Hor.vever. there were more suitable alternatives to employ that panegyric tone (Steggle 2004: 57-8) and usually compilers opted to avoid this kind of poetry. Nevertheless, this apparently is not the case ofthe eulogistic poetry addressed to Queen Elizabeth in the verse miscellanies since, as the genre develops, we notice a remarkable increase in the number of compositions dedicated to her in the works. The presence of the Queen in these collections is progressively more frequent and encomiastic, so that in late miscelianies, these poems have become a fundamental element of the genre. A chronological survey of these miscellanies