The Discriminating Consumer: Product Proliferation and Willingness to Pay for Quality (original) (raw)
Related papers
Loss Aversion for Quality in Consumer Choice
Australian Journal of Management, 2004
A reference price is an internal price that consumers are believed to use to compare actual prices. Reference effects for price have been demonstrated in many settings. Reference effects for quality also have been demonstrated using scanner data. Here we present experimental evidence. Firstly, it is shown that high quality goods will be valued more by consumers who consider trading down in quality than by those who consider trading up in quality. Secondly, we show that when all prices fall, more switching up in quality from the reference brand will occur than switching down in quality when all prices rise, and that when all prices fall, consumers will switch to higher quality up to, but not beyond, the price regularly paid.
On Consumer Beliefs about Quality and Taste
Marketers and researchers alike typically regard products as differentiated by quality (modeled via vertical differentiation) or taste (modeled via horizontal differentiation). This research examines consumer beliefs about product differentiation. For a wide variety of product pairs, different consumers hold divergent beliefs about whether each pair is a matter of quality (such that one product is objectively better) or taste (such that one product is a better match with their own personal preferences). These beliefs have meaningful consequences. When consumers believe their chosen products are objectively better rather than better matches with their preferences: (1) they are willing to pay more for the chosen product over the alternative ; (2) they self-reference less when explaining their choices; and (3) they are more likely to make transitive inferences from choices across other consumers. Observing others' contradictory choices increases the likelihood of believing those products differ by taste rather than quality. Understanding consumer beliefs about product differentiation has implications for understanding consumer decision delegation and decisions that are made in group contexts and for strategic decisions including customer segmentation, product positioning, and pricing policies. S ome products are better than others. A water filter that removes 99.9% of contaminants is better than one that removes 99%. Other products are matters of individual taste. A lemon popsicle is neither better nor worse than a lime popsicle, yet many consumers prefer one to the other. These two examples anchor the ends of a product differentiation continuum. The water filters differ in quality: the product itself is the source of value, and the superiority of one over the other is a matter of fact. The popsicles differ in taste: the match between the product and the consumer's preferences is the source of value, and the superiority of one over the other cannot be established as a matter of fact. The present research characterizes consumer beliefs about product differentiation—that is, whether the differences between products are matters of quality or taste. Different consumers hold divergent beliefs: across a wide variety of brand pairs, the minority belief regarding whether the differences are matters of quality or taste is held by more than a third of consumers on average. Such discrepancies across consumers are important: we find these beliefs affect willingness to pay and consumers' reasoning about their own choices and those of others. We report five key findings, each one holding constant the set of products. First, for a variety of sets of products, consumers hold divergent beliefs about whether the
Journal of Economic Psychology, 2011
For many consumer goods, the advent of online markets dramatically increases the amount of information available about products’ different features and qualities. Although numerous studies have investigated the effects of information quantity on individual-level decisions, it is still unknown how the amount of attribute information affects group-level patterns of behavior, particularly when consumers are also aware of a choice’s popularity. In the present studies, we hypothesized that when attribute information increases, it may exceed the individual’s cognitive capacity to process this information, and as a result conformity – choosing the most popular item – becomes more likely. In this study, we first examined empirical data collected from human subject experiments in a simulated online shopping experience, and then developed an agent-based model (ABM) to explore this behavioral clustering. Both studies confirmed our primary hypotheses, and the ABM shows promise as a tool for exploring extensions of these ideas.► We explored the interaction of information quantity and product popularity. ► Our results showed that large amounts of information lead to less choice diversity. ► We also simulated an agent-based model to explore these group-level patterns.
Comparison selection: An approach to the study of consumer judgment and choice
Journal of Consumer Psychology, 2013
We introduce an alternative perspective on the study of consumer judgment and decision making, which is based on the notion that judgment and choice problems consist of comparisons that decision makers might select. Our new perspective proposes that if we can predict the likelihood that particular comparisons will become focal in a judgment or choice task, we will be able to gain a better understanding of and anticipate the resulting effect. Building on related literatures, we propose that comparison selection is driven by the task's latitude of acceptance (LOA) and comparison fluency (i.e., the overall ease of making that comparison). The task's LOA curve represents the range and concentration of potentially acceptable comparisons, whereas comparison fluency refers to the salience and ease of making the comparison. We illustrate our approach using previously studied problems (e.g., choice, variety seeking, the "jacket and calculator" problem, and contingent valuation) as well as new empirical tests.
Outpacing Others: When Consumers Value Products Based on Relative Usage Frequency
Journal of Consumer Research, 2011
When considering the purchase of a new product, will consumers be more likely to make the purchase if they think about using it every day or if they think about using it every week? From an economic perspective, using a durable product more frequently should increase its perceived value. However, we show that perceived usage frequency relative to other consumers can influence product interest more than absolute usage frequency. In five studies, we use scale labels, advertisements, and customer reviews to invoke either a high-frequency or low-frequency norm. We show that high-frequency cues create less product interest and lower willingness to pay than low-frequency cues because consumers infer that their relative usage frequency will be lower, reducing the product's perceived fit. This effect is moderated by the consumer's perceived similarity to the standard of comparison and the consumer's own characteristics.
When Do Higher Prices Increase Demand? The Dual Role of Price in Consumers' Value Judgments
2004
Drawing on literature on judgment and decision-making, we examine the proposition that price serves two distinct roles in consumers' value judgments. First, as a product attribtute, price affects the perceived similarity of the target product to the mental prototype of a higher or lower quality product. However, price is not the only attribute used to make similarity based quality judgments. Other relevant and available product attributes moderate the effect of price on quality judgments. Second, as a measure of sacrifice, price serves as the benchmark for comparing utility gains from superior product quality. However, this comparison process is dynamic because the relative importance of money and product quality changes across consumption occasions. We present a signal detection model of consumer's price-value judgment to explain how high prices simultaneously increase as well as decrease purchase intentions. We describe how managers can use this model of value judgment to identify situations when higher price may increase demand.