Appropriate Narratives: Archaeologists, Publics and Stories (original) (raw)
ELISABETH NIKLASSON – THOMAS MEIER Appropriate narratives – an introduction. GERHARD ERMISCHER A visit to the Motel of the Mysteries: Stories and storytelling in archaeology. ELISABETH NIKLASSON Archaeology as European Added Value. TUIJA KIRKINEN Archaeological nature writing in the making of past landscapes – an ecocritical approach to prehistoric wilderness in Finnish archaeology. MICHAEL A. CREMO A report from a person who appropriates archaeologists’ narratives for the public. DIANE SCHERZLER “Selecting what is important for the reader”: About appropriations and transformations of archaeology in the mass media. THOMAS MEIER Archaeology and identity in a Bavarian village – academic and local histories. JUTTA LESKOVAR Neopaganism, archaeological content and the belief in “Celts”. STELLA KATSAROU-TZEVELEKI The Acropolis of Athens as imaginary neighbour in the local ‘homeland’. JOHN BINTLIFF Public versus professional perceptions of an invisible heritage: A Greek case study. HAMISH FORBES It’s the fort that counts, Cultural marginalisation and alternative monumentality in a Greek community. ESZTER BÁNFFY Disarmed post-socialist archaeologies? Social attitudes to interpreting the past – an interim report from Hungary. How do different publics receive and transform archaeologists’ stories? Archaeologists frequently – and often disappointingly – realise that their academic results are heavily “misunderstood” and transformed when their stories enter public discourse, even if they themselves have simplified their stories before handing them over to the visitor, listener or reader. The eleven authors of this book regard such public receptions of archaeological narratives as productive transformations in their own right and reject an old fashioned notion of academic knowledge versus the misunderstood and deteriorated narratives of “the villagers”. The paternalistic guidance of the public towards the academically sanctioned truth, as endorsed by modernity, has meant that these appropriations have consistently been disregarded and deemed useless. However, if we view such public transformations of archaeological knowledge as attempts to make archaeologists’ results meaningful outside the academic sphere, they become vital for archaeologists to understand their own place in wider society. More specifically, such analysis of what is received on different levels and how archaeological narratives are transformed, will enhance archaeologists’ ability to meet requirements of different publics and relate to their preconceptions of both archaeologists and objects.
Sign up for access to the world's latest research.
checkGet notified about relevant papers
checkSave papers to use in your research
checkJoin the discussion with peers
checkTrack your impact
Related papers
Stories We Tell: Myths at the Heart of ‘Community Archaeology’
Archaeologies, 2011
This paper forms part of a project to attempt to understand what we are really doing when we engage in the practices of public archaeology and heritage. It starts from the premise that there is no necessary correlation between intention and outcome, nor that practice follows belief. Instead, we construct our ideas about the world, about ourselves, our values and associations from what we do. The stories told here raise issues about the ability of archaeology to change the world and the distinction that we can too easily blur between professional expertise and citizenship.
Archaeology, the Public and the Recent Past
Review of: Archaeology, the Public and the Recent Past. The Society for Post-Medieval Archaeology Monograph Series. Edited by Chris Dalglish. 189 pages, illustrated. Woodbridge, Suffolk: The Boydell Press, 2013. Archaeology and Preservation of Gendered Landscapes. Edited by Sherene Baugher and Suzanne M. Spencer-Wood.
Public Significance and Imagined Archaeologists: Authoring Pasts In Context
International Journal of Historical Archaeology, 2004
This paper explores how archaeological authorship is an articulation of the imagined social roles archaeologists play with the actual contexts of our practice. The discovery of popular public discourses on archaeology should not be seen as impediments to pure archaeologies, but as routes to the significance archaeology seeks to attain. A parallel concern with the determining influence of public concerns in ethnography is reviewed to develop a method for an archaeology that is truly publicly formed. An example of a public archaeology program developed in dialogue with existing historical debates in Annapolis, Maryland illustrates.
Archaeology and Its Public(s): Thinking Through the Archaeology ‐ Public Relationship
Heritage: Journal of Multidisciplinary Studies in Archaeology 5 (2017): 56‐68 Abstract: The paper discusses the ways in which the relationship between archaeology and the public has been addressed in the academia. Moving from a brief overview of the emergence and evolution of the sub discipline of Public Archaeology, it goes on to the specific concern of how the idea of public is discussed in these studies. Through a discussion of selected texts and examples the paper underscores the necessity for marking the public in its multiplicity, and as having active agency in its relation to archaeology.
The archaeologists within: Uniting different interests in heritage within a contentious setting
Journal of Community Archaeology and Heritage, 2022
In this article, I argue for the value of community inclusion, transparency, and engagement in efforts to change attitudes towards archaeology, using a case from Åland, an autonomous archipelago in the Baltic Sea. With its own legislation concerning the protection of archaeological sites, archaeology on Åland has been a contentious subject for decades. This culminated in 2013 with the controversial trial and conviction of a family for severely and knowingly damaging one of the Stone Age sites on Åland. Against this backdrop, I initiated a project concerning an Iron Age settlement site. I discuss my experience of setting up an independent research project with a focus on publicly engaged archaeology and storytelling within an initially hostile framework, and in a region where archaeology is highly professionalized. The article also illustrates how friction around a community-oriented project can arise between stakeholders as a result of the social dynamics of archaeology itself.
Thinking through story: Archaeology and narratives
Porr, M. and J. Matthews 2015. Thinking through story: Archaeology and narratives. Unpublished paper presented at the 11th Conference on Hunting and Gathering Societies (CHAGS 11), Vienna, 08 September 2015.
Loading Preview
Sorry, preview is currently unavailable. You can download the paper by clicking the button above.