EVERYDAY FORMS OF STATE FORMATION: Some dissident remarks on "hegemony." (original) (raw)
Related papers
A discursive analysis of a struggle for hegemony in Mexico
2011
Abstract: The Zapatista rebellion which broke out on January 1, 1994, on the very day that the North Atlantic Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) was implemented, can be considered a local response to the global policy shift of the Mexican government under President Salinas de Gortari (1988-1994). This thesis includes a detailed discursive analysis of the annual speeches of the president, and the annual declarations of the EZLN (Ejército Zapatista de Liberación Nacional). One of the basic assumptions of the thesis is that these political narratives played a strategic role in a struggle to gain hegemonic acceptance amongst the Mexican populace for the respective national projects which each side envisioned. The initial chapters present a description of the socio-historical context in Mexico and of the EZLN as a social movement. Chapters III and IV describe the theoretical-methodological framework of the thesis, which integrates a Gramscian approach to hegemony with discourse theory and two main directions in critical discourse analysis (CDA): discourse and social change and the discourse-historical approach. Categories of discourse theory have been connected to categories in CDA, thus creating a framework which allows for the analysis of data in the light of a hegemonic struggle. The analysis helps to clarify concepts in discourse theory, especially ‘empty signifiers’, ‘nodal points’, ‘myth’ and ‘imaginary’. The integration of discourse theory and CDA makes possible an analysis of the discourse of the Mexican government and the EZLN in terms of processes of rearticulation. Thus, Salinas de Gortari rearticulates the national future of Mexico in terms of civic nationalism and liberal democracy; and the EZLN in terms of ethnic nationalism and a radical democracy. The final chapters discuss the stakes in this conflict and consider it in terms of the struggle, on the part of the EZLN, for the right to be different. In abstract terms, this involves an increased tension between the universal and particular – both relevant issues in a contemporary world which is characterized by multiple groups struggling to affirm their identity.
Critical Discourse Studies, 2012
Review of Maria Montesano Montessori's dissertation on the rhetoric of the Zapatistas vs. President Salinas de Gortari.
Hegemonic geographies of the Mexican neoliberal state
I use Gramsci's notion of hegemony to analyze how Mexican governments have reproduced the neoliberal state over the past twenty-five years. Hegemony is a spatially-contingent process of consensus and coercion that explains how dominant economic and political policies take shape. In the case of Mexico, I examine the rise of new political elites (technocrats), their attempts at reshaping the corporatist consensus through social pacts, and their use of a regional economic model as national archetype for economic development. More specifically, this analysis employs labor politics to illustrate how the government uses consensus and coercion to maintain the state as the privileged space for shaping the hegemonic geographies of economic development in Mexico.
Envisioning Power In Mexico: Legitimacy, Crisis, and the Practice of Patrimony
Journal of Historical Sociology, 2003
In his early work, Eric R. Wolf made provocative arguments about the genealogy of power in Mexico. Yet once he broadened his interests to peasant studies and the history of capitalism, he never returned to make a sustained examination of power in Mexico. This article extends Wolf's insights into an analysis of the current political and economic situation in Mexico. I focus on the practice of categorizing objects as the inalienable property of a given collective, such as a city, region, institution, or nation. These possessions -often referred to as patrimonio (patrimony) -are understood to have been handed down from prior generations and intended to be handed down in turn to future generations. I look at this mode of characterizing property in the areas of subsoil resources, collectively held land, and "cultural properties."
Decentering the Regime: Culture and Regional Politics in Mexico
Latin American Research Review
As a preeminent enduring regime in the world today, Mexico provides a compelling case study regarding the nature and locus of power. Since the 1970s, accounts of politics in postrevolutionary Mexico have assumed that ongoing domination has resulted from centralized, relatively homogeneous power transmitted outward through corporatist mechanisms. The process of transmission replicated the dynamics of the center through a combination of skillful management and efficient coercion. Even now, as researchers are emphasizing the breakdown of corporatism and the complexity and nuance of current Mexican politics, they continue to codify the past according to the terms of the 1970s analysis and view the present through this lens. But while social scientists in the 1970s were right to characterize the postrevolutionary Mexican regime as authoritarian and hegemonic, they were wrong about the nature of hegemony. In constructing a state-centered and center-centered understanding of politics, soci...
Capital & Class , 2010
This article draws on Antonio Gramsci's key concepts of passive revolution and hegemony to explore how specific scalar and spatial configurations have been historically produced in Mexico, within the conditions of worldwide capitalist development. It argues that passive revolution-understood as the stateled reorganisation of social relations that seeks to maintain or restore class domination-can be seen as a recurring theme of Mexican history in the 20th century. In order to make this case, the author examines the Mexican Revolution and elaborates the case for labelling it as a 'passive revolution'. Following this, the contradictory character of Mexico's development trajectory is explored, and the resulting restructuring of the economy along neoliberal lines is interpreted as a second phase of passive revolution. Through an analysis of changing state formation and the spaces and scales associated with it, the article thereby highlights the key antinomies of capitalist development that have augured the recurrence of passive revolutions.