Governance, Fragility and Insurgency in the Sahel: A Hybrid Political Order in the Making (original) (raw)
Related papers
The Proliferation of Armed Non-State Actors in the Sahel: Drivers, Ramifications and the Way Forward
Journal of Central and Eastern European African Studies, 2022
The increase in the spate of insecurity in West Africa and the Sahel has assumed colossal proportions. Insecurity in the region is largely perpetuated by non-state actors that continue to rise in numbers and evolve in operations. Indeed, armed non-state actors pervade Niger, Mali, Burkina Faso, Chad and Nigeria. The proliferation of these armed nonstate actors constitutes a bane to the development of the region as it further subjects the region to extreme poverty, unprecedented humanitarian crisis and state fragility. This paper, therefore, examines how the mutually reinforcing challenges of climate change, bad governance, local militias, ungoverned space and poverty have necessitated the polarization of terror networks. This is done through the adoption of a qualitative approach and reliance on secondary sources of data such as textbooks, peer-reviewed journal articles, government reports, newspaper articles, online newspapers etc. The paper finds that governance is a critical driver and predictive element in the understanding of the proliferation of ANSAs. It concludes that ANSAs take advantage of poor governance to establish an informal governance system that adopts violence to maintain control whilst encouraging a shadow economy characterized by terrorism, kidnap for ransom, rivalry attacks and illegal activities. The paper, therefore, recommends the adoption of a framework of local governance characterized by responsive institutions, inclusive politics and resilient society.
Militarism and its limits: Sociological insights on security assemblages in the Sahel
Security Dialogue
This article assesses the concepts of militarism and militarization in relation to contemporary security interventions in the Sahel, a region increasingly understood through the prisms of violence, cross-border illicit flows, and limited statehood. This region is subject to security interventions that include French military action, EU-funded projects to prevent drug trafficking, and both bilateral and multilateral efforts against irregular migration. To many observers, it is experiencing an ongoing militarization. We argue that while the inextricable concepts of militarism and militarization go some way towards explaining interventions’ occasional use of military violence, they are limited in their grasp of the non-martial and symbolic violence in security practices. We instead propose a focus on assemblages of (in)security to show the heterogeneous mix of global and local actors, and often contradictory rationalities and practices that shape the logics of symbolic and martial viol...
ABSTRACT. The current political developments in Libya and northern Mali represent nothing less than the renegotiation of the postcolonial political order. The toppling of Libya’s authoritarian regime and the country’s subsequent disintegration into post-revolutionary camps, plus the continuing Tuareg rebellion in northern Mali accompanied by the rise of transnational jihadist forces, have fostered the fragmentation of state structures, greater heterogeneity in politics, and gains by nonstate power groups on the complex political stage. To assess these processes the article proposes three theoretical concepts and fields of research: heterarchy (historical and present), connectivities in northwest Africa, and the importance of local actors/locality. KEYWORDS. Africa, connectivity, heterarchy, Imazighan, Libya, local actors, locality, northern Mali, northwest, order, politics, Tuareg, transnational jihadists
Conflict and Stabilisation in Mali and the Sahel Region
The report covers factors including: Islamist terrorism; criminal networks and trafficking (of arms, drugs, cigarettes, and vehicles); and Tuareg rebellions against the Malian government. It also considers state weakness, including the weakness of state security structures in the north, and the role of neighbouring countries, ECOWAS, the AU and other international actors. Practical recommendations in the literature include: Adopt a burden-sharing and a multi-tiered approach that builds on the strengths of different actors Support livelihoods and integrate Tuareg concerns over land and livelihood opportunities through inclusive political engagement Seek to weaken incrementally the criminal networks in Mali's north through coherent international support for regional cooperation Establish a common position on ransom payments Consider joint anti-terrorism and development policies aiming to strengthen the state's operational capacity to deliver security and development Draw on traditional conflict-management mechanisms, such as inter-community and inter-clan solidarity systems Be sensitive to historical tensions between the Hausa and Tuareg ethnic groups.
FROM PUTSCHISTS TO FIGHTERS OF TERRORISM: PROGRESSIVE RETURN TO STABILITY IN CENTRAL SAHEL REGION
2024
This study examines the leadership capacity of revolutionary military leaders in sustaining peace in Central Sahel region. The escalation of violence and humanitarian crisis linked to jihadists insurgency has compelled both the international and national community to intervene in Burkina Faso, Mali and Niger in order to sustain peace and curb terrorist expansions. It is in this context that, regional peace keeping missions were deployed and mediation initiatives yield to the signing of ceasefire and peace treaties between incumbent government and the rebel groups in the Sahel region. However, corruption, political tensions and insufficient logistics jeopardised the very existence of peacekeeping missions and terrorism remained threat to the territorial integrity of Central Sahel Countries. Therefore, this study sets out to discuss revolutionary military leaders’ ambition to restore homeland security. It questions the reoccurrence of coup d’états while presenting the peace and conflict mediation initiative in Central Sahel. Based on qualitative research techniques, data from documentary sources were content analysed. Findings reveal that, Central Sahel military leaders seek to sustain homeland security and development before a possible military-civil transition.
The Fragility Dilemma and Divergent Security Complexes in the Sahel
The International Spectator, 2020
Despite an exponential increase in international resources devoted to the Sahel, the situation on the ground continues to deteriorate. This is largely due to the so-called “fragility dilemma”, faced by fragile states that are in critical need of external assistance, but have limited absorption capacity and are governed by sitting regimes that dictate the terms and upon which external actors must rely. This dilemma has contributed to an increasing divergence between a state-centric regional and a people-centric transnational security complex. In particular, a heavy-handed approach to violent extremism and external policies aimed at curbing irregular migration have had a number of unintended consequences, disrupting livelihoods and further exacerbating instability in the Sahelian states.
Territory, Politics, Governance, 2022
This article investigates the interactions between three regional organizations – the G5 Sahel, the Economic Community of West African States (ECOWAS) and the African Union – in the context of the Sahelian conflict. It argues that these organizations struggle for recognition by the international community and by their member states as the most legitimate regional security actor in the management of the conflict. By focusing on the politics driving these organizations’ interactions, this article makes two contributions. First, it complements and expands the literature on regional security governance by showing how these regional organizations are driven by legitimation struggles framed through spatial imaginaries. Each organization delineates a specific space of intervention – the Sahel, West Africa, the Sahelo-Sahara – to present itself as the right scale of governance. Second, identifying these spatial imaginaries enables a better understanding of African responses to the conflict in the Sahel, and provides insights into the reordering of (West) African security governance and, more broadly, the emergence of new modalities of security governance.