The Issue of Schooling….or How to Tame a Horse (original) (raw)
The issue of schooling is being thoroughly analyzed by a number of excellent scholars in this special issue. It is a very comprehensive analytical work which I intend to take into a commentary consideration in this brief article. Schooling is a matter of great and recent concern not the least from a political point of view, where schooling seems to take on a specific role that deals with not only schooling as a normativity but also schooling as the absolute forming of students. Despite ongoing disagreements on what kind of schooling may prove the best as well as the correct form of education as a whole, in this paper I argue that relevant science may have a pretty good idea as to how to apply schooling in such a way as to ensure that teaching is applied equally efficient. It is, however, slightly more difficult to see how this very same science and the above-mentioned knowledge finds its way into educational policies not to mention finding its way into the classroom. I argue, that schooling is not (surprisingly and not only) society's tool for data delivery and data interpretation, but also (and perhaps rather) some certain specific actors of society's tool for culturalization. This thereby changes schooling from being an educational tool only, a mere transfer of data and a formation of students into a political tool, thus creating a notion of schooling being more or less synonymous with a different kind of formation, a formation of a quite specific nature to suit quite specific properties. I claim these properties to be of an economic, market oriented and universalist nature. I therefore wish to draw attention to two aspects of interest: the oddity of science's position in this matter, where science appears to have plausible answers as to how the best possible The following constitutes a comprehensive commentary to schooling as a term with many faces, as demonstrated by a line of brilliant scholars in this special issue. This paper may seem slightly drifting away from its role as a commentary article. However, I base my commentary on two articles especially; Åsta Birkeland and Siv Ødemotland (2018) and their article on their educational exchange with Chinese kindergarten on one hand and Thomas Szulevicz' article (2018) on the perhaps improper marriage between psychology and (what he refers to as) neoliberal schools.
Sign up for access to the world's latest research.
checkGet notified about relevant papers
checkSave papers to use in your research
checkJoin the discussion with peers
checkTrack your impact
Related papers
Education and Schooling Revisited
Although the structural-functional school has largely fallen out of favour in academic circles in the twenty-five years or so since this article was written, these ideas still sometimes crop up as part of the public’s implicit understanding of the purpose of education and schooling. The structural-functional interpretation was so widely disseminated in the 1940s-1990s, that it became an almost unquestioned, hegemonic ideology. This article may help critique those ideas.The writings of Paulo Freire are, of course, timeless.
Schooling as an Ideological State Apparatus
While secondary schooling has developed much over the past century, its original impetus has remained. This includes the doctrine of social efficiency which may be understood as the ease of transition from student to workforce. In a socially efficient classroom, students are shaped into factory workers and students. Regardless of the lip-service paid to the “learning” and “understanding” that the contemporary secondary-classroom ostensibly facilitates, these are by no means the chief goal. The present paper compares a socially efficient classroom to the schooling described by Althusser (1970) in his discussion of Ideological State Apparatuses (ISAs). Even today, schooling may well be understood as an ISA, indoctrinating students into the prevailing ideology first by alienating students from their role as democratic citizens, and secondly by employing controls—ideological and then repressive. Together, this facilitates the de-democratization of the classroom and its students and effectively eliminates any possibility of an amendment to the prevailing ideology. The consequences of these are considered which includes the increasing superfluousness of diplomas and degrees as well as incarceration rates of drop-out students. So considered, Marx is used to explain how schooling protects the power of those in power while subjugating those without, and Deleuze is used to demonstrate the manner by which schooling is used to enact societal control.
On the Politics of Educational Theory
2016
What does educational theory do? This bold and original text positions educational theory as producer of social realities and political ideas.' Claudia Ruitenberg, Associate Professor, Philosophy of Education, University of British Columbia, Canada 'Educational theory is seldom treated with more important than it is in this book. Instead of trying to construct yet another educational theory to change, understand or explain the role of education in social contexts, Tomasz Szkudlarek starts from educational theory itself as a porous, vibrating field of energy inherently producing social reality. Instead of social reality establishing the conditions for educational thinking, Szkudlarek stresses how educational theory is a creation of certain visibilities that organize the social world and shape political hegemonies. As such this book is both innovative and provocative in its conceptualisation of the relationship between education, theory and politics and in its capacity to visualise how active social forces constitute what we consider to be 'real'.
Contemporary Schooling: ‘Time-honoured Disorder’ or ‘A Necessary Evil’
INDIAN JOURNAL OF ADULT EDUCATION, 2018
Is school a horrible place? A lot of the younger children start crying, even with the stimulus of school. The stimulus could be even the horn of the school bus. This is how, children reflect their unwillingness to go to school. Clearly, it reflects that they are not enjoying their school life. Theoretically, the paradigm has shifted from ‘teacher centered approach’ to ‘child centered approach’, whereas, reflection of the children seems to be contrary to this shift. Further, it reveals that schooling is a painful experience for them.
Loading Preview
Sorry, preview is currently unavailable. You can download the paper by clicking the button above.