Basic Research Ideology: The Postwar Consensus on Fundamental Research in the United States and the Invention of National Interests in Academic Science, 1945-1957 (original) (raw)
Related papers
“The Politics of Pure Science” Revisited
Science and Public Policy
On the occasion of the 50th anniversary of Daniel Greenberg’s The Politics of Pure Science, we discuss trajectories of 20th century science policy concepts. Statistical analyses of digitized text corpora shed light on how ‘basic research’ became the predominant concept during World War II and in the postwar decades. In contrast to the 19th century ideal of pure science, ‘basic research’ conveys both the promise of utility and the promise of autonomy. The historical concept succeeded to bridge the gap between political and industrial expectations on the one hand and the uncertainty of the research endeavor on the other hand. Despite the more recent criticism toward the ideal of basic research, our analysis indicates that the very same concept remains relevant in normal science communication.
In the exploration of the consistently complex and brutal interplay between politics and scientific and technological advancements, significant insights can be found within a number of large government-sponsored programs in which exceptional new technologies were developed and significant scientific research was either accomplished or seeded for future discoverers. Those specific projects are the Apollo Program, the Space Shuttle (Space Transportation System) project, the Superconducting Super Collider, and the Space Launch System. The numerous failures of nuclear power in the decades following the Manhattan Project also provides a window through which socioeconomic and political influences can afflict science and technology. These projects all share some form of significant failure or premature cancellation wrought upon them by industrial, managerial, and political failures of all kinds, failures which severely inhibited or even completely destroyed the original potential of these projects. The roles of overwhelming bureaucracy and of overbearing mistakes on behalf of the government are central to these failures, and as a result it is clear that the importance of the interactions between science and the political systems and industrial complexes that they must coexist with to succeed cannot be exaggerated. Throughout the history of governmental interactions with scientific endeavors, it becomes clear that the support of a government in scientific research carries with it an expectation that the research conducted is inherently a means to an end. This expectation, illustrated time and time again in undertakings like the Manhattan Project and the Apollo
Features of the current science policy regime: Viewed in historical perspective
This paper aims to throw into relief some of the general features in the development of the history of science policy by drawing attention to the continuation and deepening of old issues in new forms within the current science policy regime. The paper presents a typology which distinguishes different ways in which policy attempts to 'account' for public funding of science by showing how science contributes to wealth and prosperity. The paper concludes that the new forms of accounting place the focus of attention on what is 'produced' in science and that science policy itself has become dominated by the logic of globalism and new public management.
The republic of science: its political and economic theory
Minerva
In launching Minerva in 1962, Edward Shils embraced a wide agenda of issues associated with research, learning and higher education. He hoped, in particular, to make 'scientific and academic policy more reasonable and realistic'. From time to time Minerva will reprint from its ...
Science, Democracy, and the American University: From the Civil War to the Cold War
Journal of American History, 2013
This book reinterprets the rise of the natural and social sciences as sources of political authority in modern America. Andrew Jewett demonstrates the remarkable persistence of a belief that the scientific enterprise carried with it a set of ethical values capable of grounding a democratic culture-a political function widely assigned to religion. The book traces the shifting formulations of this belief from the creation of the research universities in the Civil War era to the early Cold War years. It examines hundreds of leading scholars who viewed science not merely as a source of technical knowledge, but also as a resource for fostering cultural change. This vision generated surprisingly nuanced portraits of science in the years before the military-industrial complex and has much to teach us today about the relationship between science and democracy.
Economic and Social Studies of Scientific Research Nature and Origins
SSRN Electronic Journal, 2000
Interest in the role that science and scientific research play in economics and the other social sciences has exploded in the last fifty years. This attention undoubtedly reflects the increased importance that scientific research is contributing more and more to employment and economic growth, as well as the comparative advantage of countries. The purpose of this paper is to investigate the nature and origins of the studies which focus scientific research and organization (such as economics of science, sociology of science, managerial economics of research organizations, political economy of science, etc.). The paper shows as the foundations of this discipline are the works of Huxley, Bernal, Bush, Peirce, Polanyi, and Freedman and the success of the Manhattan and Rand projects (1930s-1950s) that symbolised the power of big science projects involving governments, scientists, industrialists and universities.