LEADERSHIP EFFECTIVE DECISION-MAKING: Thinking Critically and Rationally (original) (raw)
Related papers
Strategic Leadership Newsletter: Volume 3, Number 1
2017
Strategic Leadership Newsletter reports information relevant to the Philadelphia University Doctor of Management in Strategic Leadership program including personal and professional events and accomplishments, new practices, research and opportunities, and suggestions. You are encouraged to forward the Newsletter to friends and colleagues to expand awareness and to brand yourself as a community member. You are also invited to recommend people or organizations to be added to the mailing list. Contact Strategic Leadership Newsletter by emailing the Editor starrl@philau.ed
Strategic Leadership Newsletter: Volume 3, Number 3
2017
Jefferson Strategic Leadership Newsletter reports information relevant to the Jefferson (Philadelphia University + Thomas Jefferson University) Doctor of Management Program in Strategic Leadership (DSL) and its community including personal and professional events and accomplishments, new practices, research, opportunities, and suggestions. You are encouraged to forward the Newsletter to friends and colleagues to expand awareness and to brand yourself as a community member. You are also invited to recommend people or organizations to be added to the mailing list. Contact Jefferson Strategic Leadershi
Decision-Making in Organizations
Advances in Human Resources Management and Organizational Development, 2014
The use of a collaborative decision-making model has been shown to produce more creative solutions and to increase the size of the stakeholder pool, as well as increase the commitment of stakeholders to final decisions. This study combines the research in group decision-making using the functional theory and the bona fide group perspective along with the large body of research on Group Decision Support Systems (GDSS). The purpose is to assist organizations in both making decisions and understanding the processes used and individuals involved in those decisions. This longitudinal study of one university’s collaboration process presents their multiple planning efforts in accreditation and creating civility. Two participant-observers discuss several bona fide decision making groups across a five-year period along with the application of a GDSS that uses Saaty’s Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) to assist in that decision-making. The usefulness of GDSS is discussed and its future applica...
Strategic Leadership Newsletter: Volume 4, Number 1
2018
Jefferson Strategic Leadership Newsletter reports information relevant to the Jefferson (Philadelphia University + Thomas Jefferson University) Doctor of Management Program in Strategic Leadership (DSL) and its community including personal and professional events and accomplishments, new practices, research, opportunities, and suggestions
The Impact of Group Size on Decision Effectiveness
European Journal of Marketing and Economics, 2020
The relationship between organization and environment, based on the need to gather information and find resources, is increasingly characterized by a high level of uncertainty. Uncertainty means that managers do not have enough information and time to anticipate changes and make good decisions. More and more managers make decisions about new problems or situations. The level of risk increases, as well as the degree of complexity that the decision maker has to face. Under these conditions, organizations are moving towards the use of groups. The main purpose of the current research is to identify what are the most important benefits and limits of the group referring to its size, taking into analysis the banking institutions. For the current study is adopted the quantitative research and for the data collection is used the questionnaire. A total of 344 questionnaire are distributed. 80 percent of the participants agree that group size affects the quality of the decisions made and most ...
Structuring the decision process
This chapter includes a discussion of leadership decisions and stress. Many leaders are daily exposed to stress when they must make decisions, and there are often social reasons for this. Social standards suggest that a leader must be proactive and make decisions and not flee the situation. Conflict often creates stress in decision-making situations. It is important for leaders to understand that it is not stress in itself that leads to bad decisions, rather, bad decisions may be the result of time pressure in the sense that leaders have not been able to gather enough relevant information. Thus, it is worthwhile for leaders to be able to prioritize properly in order to cope with stressful situations. In some situations, a leader chooses to delegate the decisions to his/her team and then it is important to guard against «groupthink», a phenomenon where members of a team put consensus before anything else as a result of the peer pressure. A number of methods are presented that enable leaders to avoid this phenomenon. Often leaders are involved in decision-making situations where they are forced to navigate between objectives that are in strong conflict with each other. We are talking about «decision dilemmas». These are characterized by the existence of a conflict between the top leadership's desire to control the activities and their wish to give autonomy and independence to the various units. It is important for leaders to be able to strike a balance in different dilemma situations and understand how to best manage conflicts when they arise. Working with structured group processes The basic idea of structured group processes is that a panel of experts can make more realistic predictions than a group of laymen. It is common that these processes are referred to as the Delphi technique. The number of respondents is usually between 30 − 40 participants. However, it is suggested by Wright and Goodwin (2008) that 5−20 participants should be used. It is important that the participants are guaranteed anonymity. All participants receive comprehensive feedback from the whole group so that each member has the opportunity to adjust their own assessments. Often a special research group that plans exercises, tests questions, and analyzes the results is created. It is common that a group of experts initially responds to a well-designed questionnaire. Here, they give their views on when a number of events of strategic importance will appear in the future, if at all. After this first round is finished, the results are summarized for each event, in quartiles for the whole group. Then it
Business: Decision Making within organizations
The issue at UCP-SARnet was that there are some unethical people that have been brought onto the team and are spreading and causing rumors. This is an issue because as a team we need to work together and not work against each other. I am the Assistant Director which means I am right next to the facilitator in the organization. It is almost as if everyone is trying to be on the facilitator’s good side by telling him bad things about other people. There were some rumors that were said about me by a couple of people to other members on our team. At this point, I realized there was an issue at hand and it had to be dealt with in some way.
CONTROLLING THE DECISION MAKING PROCESS IN COMPLEX ORGANIZATIONS. A QUALITATIVE RESEARCH APPROACH.
How can we improve the quality of decision making in complex organizations? Addressing this lively question is now regarded as central also in the research methods and practice field. In fact, how we explain in this work, it implies the research of appropriate methods for understanding the link between the decision makers’ personality and its distortions. In particular, this paper addresses the proposed question through a qualitative research approach, which is becoming relevant after a long period of scientific attention mainly towards quantitative research (e.g. Lee & Cassell, 2013). Qualitative research is also suitable because it offers a considerable potential for our understanding of key issues within work psychology (e.g. Cassell & Symon 2011), that is an important aspect of our paper. On this basis, in the paper we perform different qualitative analyses. First, we use a qualitative problem-solving tool recently developed by the psychologist Kahneman and colleagues (2011). Here, we try to identify and eliminate cognitive distortions in decision making through verifying, ex post, their quality. Second, we also use the MBTI personality test to capture, more effectively, the role that the decision makers’ personality may have in decision making. At the core of the work is the case study of Consorzio ELIS, which is an Italian organization that provides programmes of higher education. The case study analyzes the quality of the decision making process relating to the introduction of three new services, i.e. Business Model Lab, Pursuing Shared Value, and Business School. We believe that our study may have useful implications for the EURAM’s Research Methods and Practice SIG. The study is intended not only for those scholars and professionals interested in learning more about the way in which psychological and behavioral aspects may influence decision making, but also for those scholars interested in their methods of investigation.
Group decision making: friend or foe?
2003
Recognized as essential to modern business, collaborative meetings are held to make decisions about product design, market definition, employee hiring, and many other factors that affect business operations. Based on the literature on group decision-making (a single collaboratively assigned selection from an array of choices), several hypothesis have been generated for further research based on three fundamental problems with group decision-making: impact of initial preference and time pressure, impact of group dynamics and politics, and the lack of an objective quantitative group preference. We suggest that group decision making should not be utilized unless there are objective criteria (i.e., money, time) that allow the group members to evaluate decision choices for determination of group preferences. Without these objective criteria, the use of group decision-making should be reserved for use in option generation (i.e. brainstorming), problem solving, or creative processes of an exploratory nature.
TABLE OF CONTENT EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 3 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The United Nations' main goal is to provide professional business analysis and plan to help our client solving their currently operating problems; furthermore, creating the value of corporate and employees' well-being. After two months' analysis and explored, our group discover the three central problems for the Reclaim Bay Fishing Resort. First of all, as a chief executive officer, Jim Sawchuck has inadequate business experience and operative knowledge, this deficiency is leading to many problems within the Reclaim Bay Fishing Resort such as inadequate business knowledge, poor and informal communication and disregard for occupational health, safety legislation and business legislation. According to these three central problems, our group demonstrated two solutions for each problem. For the lack of business knowledge, hiring professional person to help and taking MBA course to gain knowledge are the best two solutions to resolve this problem. On the one hand, the two solutions of establishing corporate legal security department and having the necessary tools available for execution of the employee's activity are important to help corporate solving the occupational health, safety legislation and business legislation problems. On the other hand, it's vital to settle the communication problem by providing an internal social media and group interactive activity to employees. In order to reach the company's goal, it's necessary for Sawchuck to enhance the business knowledge and communication skill to lead his corporation being success. According to the Decision Making Criteria and Importance Weight chart, the best two solutions of poor and informal communication are setting up the internal social media and offering group interactive activities. In order to completely solve the communication problem, all the fishing resort employees should work together to execute both solutions, especially the Chief Executive Officer and Human Resource department. First of all, when implementing the internal social media, the Information Technology Department's skill is the necessary resource to help the company set up the communication channel. The IT department assists in setting up internal communication channels such as corporate e-mails, the Internet, in-house communication platforms, and video conferencing systems. IT departments provide their technology with regular maintenance and improved communication systems, as