The dialectic nature of the Rhetorical structure in the editorials of two Finnish business newspapers (original) (raw)
Related papers
The Rhetorical Structure of Editorials in English, Swedish and Finnish Business Newspapers
… Proceedings of the 5th International Aelfe …, 2007
In this article we will study the rhetorical structure of editorials in English, Swedish and Finnish business newspapers, Financial Times, Dagens Industri, and Taloussanomat. Our aim is to find out if there is a typical rhetorical structure for the editorials and if there are different types. Our analysis shows that the typical rhetorical structure for the editorials includes an introduction section, an intermediate section and a coda. When there is variation it concerns two stages of the rhetorical structure, i.e. the solution and the moral.
Rhetorical Aspects in Newspaper Editorials
This article outlines the common rhetorical aspects in newspaper editorials. The discussion is based on available writings on editorials, and is presented as a synthesis of different critical perspectives. The text does not aim to provide a comprehensive guideline for studying editorials, but manages to indicate the features required for a critical inquiry. I fist underline the basic ideas on editorials, and move on to the analysis of the main rhetorical features, especially the cultural-ideological stances and structural discursiveness. Key words: rhetorical aspects, newspaper, discussion.
Discourse and Rhetoric: A Study of Pakistani English Newspapers' Editorials
Discourse and Rhetoric: A Study of Pakistani English Newspapers' Editorials, 2018
This particular study aims at exploring the use of rhetorical devices from the editorials of Pakistani English newspapers. For this purpose, data was collected from three Pakistani English newspapers The News, Dawn, and The Nation. Using purposive sampling technique, 36 editorials were selected; 12 editorials from each newspaper, which were published on the coverage of Panama Leaks from April 2016 to December 2016. In order to find out the answers of research questions, mixed method approach was applied. Findings revealed that the editorial writers have employed eight rhetorical devices namely Parallelism, Antithesis, Simile, Metonymy, Hyperbole, Metaphor, Neologism and Rhetorical question commonly in their individual discourse to persuade the readers, while Oxymoron and Allusion were rarely used. Results of Chi-Square revealed statistically significant frequency differences in the use of rhetorical devices. The total frequency of Rhetorical devices was found higher in Dawn as compared to The News and The Nation. Metonymy was found most frequently used rhetorical device in three newspapers. Hyperbole was second and rhetorical question was third frequently used rhetorical device in three newspapers. From the perspective of pedagogy, the results of current study can provide English foreign language teachers and students with the knowledge about the use of rhetoric in the genre of newspapers' editorials. Therefore, editorials can be used as a source for writing persuasive and argumentative essays. This study would be helpful for general masses to make them aware that how the use of rhetoric in newspaper's discourse manipulate them according to the desired ideologies of Newspapers. This Research would also be valuable for the future researchers, especially for those who are interested in exploring the newspaper discourse, with particular focus on the genre of Editorial, as they can further explore the use of rhetoric in comparison to foreign newspapers' editorials.
Hedging and Boosting the Rhetorical Structure of English Newspaper Editorials
UKH Journal of Social Sciences, 2018
To present the official position of newspapers effectively to the public, the editors’ awareness of the rhetorical structure and linguistic elements employed in editorials is essential. Yet, no studies have explored the use of hedges and boosters in each rhetorical move of the editorials. To realize the objectives, 240 editorials published in the New York Times (NYT) and New Straits Times (NST) were analyzed at both macro and micro levels. The results revealed that both types of newspapers prefer the use of hedges to boosters in editorials. Furthermore, it was revealed that hedges in the NYT editorials were less frequent than their Malaysian counterpart, while boosters in the NYT were more frequently used than in the NST. This reveals that it is a convention in editorials to be tentative in expressing their view point, while in comparison NYT seems to be more bold, and certain in expressing its stance than NST that is more tentative. In addition, in the NYT hedges and boosters were ...
Headlines in Newspaper Editorials: A Contrastive Study
SAGE Open, 2013
Newspaper editorials constitute a part of media discourse, which is an extremely important field of research in intercultural rhetoric analysis and EFL (English as a foreign language)/ESL (English as a second language) studies. Specifically, certain features of editorial headlines and also their important role in monitoring and directing readers' attention have made the interface between the linguistic analysis of newspaper editorial headlines and teaching of EFL as a relevant issue in language teaching. Through conducting a contrastive textual analysis of selected headlines, culled from the editorials of the English newspaper, The New York Times, and those of Persian newspaper, Tehran Times, the present study aimed at exploring the kind of textual and rhetorical strategies the two newspapers used for propagating their preferred ideologies. The results of the study indicated that headlines in the two papers presented a subjective attitude of the writers (newspapers) toward the topic. However, based on the analysis of the data, it became clear that there were certain differences between the two sets of headlines in terms of Presupposition, and certain Rhetorical devices.
Ideological Perspectives in Editorial: A Critical Study of Hallmark Editorial
2017
When news and events unfold, people turn to media for information, interpretation and, ultimately, analysis. Newspaper as a print organ of journalism becomes a point of reference especially for the elites. Interestingly, most readers dogmatically agree with newspapers’ views than other media’s because they are largely perceived to be neutral; little do they realise that these newspapers are also ideologically-driven. This paper examines an editorial of Hallmark newspaper using a multi-disciplinary approach of Critical Discourse Analysis as an analytical tool. The analysis established, among others, that editorial as an opinion-cum-identity discourse creates a distinctive “social identity” by positively evaluating the actions and behaviours of the in-group as against the negative evaluation of the out-group. The paper concludes that newspaper editorials are neither neutral nor objective. They are influenced by relation of power, and ideologically inclined.
Advances in the Linguistic Sciences, 2019
Communication is not done in isolation. Ideas, opinions, beliefs etc. shared during communication are presented as strands in a larger dialogue unit with other discourse participants and subjects. For a language user to communicate his/her opinion in a larger dialogue unit containing different subjects or opinions, the linguistic stance is deployed to either evaluate, position or align with the existing subject matters. However, how this is achieved has not been made sufficiently explicit by linguists. It is on this basis therefore that this study focuses on the deployment of linguistic stance in the editorials of the Vanguard Newspaper with a view to underlining the nature of communication through conjunctional adversatives. The study adopted the stance triangle framework of John Du Bois (2007) as the theoretical framework. The study used ten (10) editorials (from February, 2018 to April, 2018) of the Vanguard Newspaper as the population of the study. The editorials chosen were found to have deployed linguistic stance through adversative conjunctions. Each of these instances were analysed in line with the stance triangle. At the end, the study presents as part of its findings that linguistic stance helps the language user to implicitly communicate explicit messages of evaluation, position and alignment with the subject matter raised in a discourse. The adversative conjunctions enable editorials to shift or change focus from subject 1 to subject 2 before making the decision to align with any of them. Also, the subject 1 in the stance triangle is usually the popular opinion in the discourse but with the use of adversative conjunctions, the editorial is able to present another opinion of the discourse that might not be too popular. This second opinion then forms the basis for the subject 2 and a possible alignment.
2007
This paper explores the expression of author commitment to the validity of the information, and the degree of subjectivity or intersubjectivity involved in the presentation of the information in two genres of newspaper discourse, opinion columns and leading articles. The dimension of author commitment is analysed in terms of the parameters: evidentiary validity and degree of certainty. The dimension of subjectivity is studied on the basis of the interaction between two parameters: the degree of salience and explicitness of the role of the subject of conception, and expression of personal vs. shared responsibility for the information. The results of the corpus study indicate that there are no significant differences between the two genres regarding the dimension of author commitment. These two genres within the domain of argumentative discourse, however, differ in the dimension of subjectivity. As is to be expected, there is a greater degree of salience of conceptualizer role and more overt shared responsibility in opinion columns than in leading articles.
Patterns of rhetorical moves and use of hedges and boosters in editorials of two newspapers
2016
An editorial in a newspaper is a popular genre targeting general public as its discourse community. It plays an influential role as it presents the official position of the newspaper on a topic that is considered to be of particular societal importance. To carry the message through effectively to the public, the editors’ awareness of the generic prototypical pattern and rhetorical moves employed in editorial writings is essential, yet few studies have been done to investigate the rhetorical structure of editorials and determine their persuasive style. Furthermore, despite the effective functions of hedges and boosters in persuading readers, studies that address them are limited. Based on the belief that each writing genre has its own unique rhetorical conventions and linguistic features to engage its readers, this study aims to compare the generic characteristics and the use of hedges and boosters in the editorials of The New York Times (NYT) and New Straits Times (NST). The reason ...