Leitourgia - a Semantic Glimpse into the Anglican Church's Past (original) (raw)

"Editors’ Notes," Anglican Theological Review 102, no. 1 (Winter 2020): 1–5

2020

As we write, it is winter in the Northern Hemisphere. The sap is thick in the leafless trees. Few plants are growing. Many birds have departed for warmer climes. Many animals have slowed down to preserve their energy in a time of food scarcity. Some have even decided to sleep through it entirely. People stay at home more in the gray and all-too-brief light of winter. Winter is generally a time of stasis, of rest, of dormancy.

Resacralising the Liturgy

New Blackfriars, 1987

Archer has written a timely sociological analysis of the present state of Catholicism in the United Kingdom. It is a ruthless, honest, almost clinical account of the ironic and paradoxical effects of the flabby liberal rhetoric that has shaped the practice of the post-Conciliar Church in Britain. It is unevenly written; some of its liturgical conclusions are a bit odd; and many will find it cynical and unconstructive. Yet it is a book that deserves debate. My interpretation of his text suggests he is arguing as follows. A slow process of ecclesiastical embourgeoisement has been the main product of the theological hopes of the seventies, an ironic result for a rhetoric of egalitarianism that reached its most ludicrous level of cant amongst radical theologians, whose slant sent many out of the Church. One fringe developed another, and a 'charismatic chicanery' (to use Archer's apt phrase) came to pass, apolitical and ecstatic, making natural friends with the house groups and other Evangelical sects beloved of sociological study. English Catholicism was caricatured, and the debates these fringes generated obscured the social conditions of religious practice of the silent majority. Archer's book gives a sociological expression to their existence, and far that reason is of immense theological value. He presents an image of a liberal Catholic Church developing Anglican traits and increasingly hopeful of slipping into the Establishment, a denomination amongst others in a safe part of the political landscape. A 'safe' set of house theologians are allowed to roam out, some producing a liberation theology that has inadvertently become an instrument of recruitment to Protestant Fundamentalism. Some sociologists started to notice that the weak, the disadvantaged, and those in whose name these theologians spoke, were slipping away. Workingclass Catholic communities that had withstood persecution and hostility were starting to fall apart. Somehow theologians had managed to accomplish what those hostile to the Church had never managed: a climate of despair and disenchantment that unchurched the less well educated, the less theologically sophisticated, and the simple but pious. Urban renewal, poverty, unemployment, and competing forms of association have all contributed to Archer's embourgeoisement thesis. But the implications of his analysis go deeper. The rhetoric of Vatican 11's document Gaudium et 5 '