Aurangzeb a bad ruler but Narendra Modi could be repeating his mistakes (Sonali Ranade, 18 January 2021) (original) (raw)
Related papers
Mughal Kingship and Ideas of Religiosity: Collaboration, Compromise, and Cooperation
The focus of this paper would be on how Mughal kingship was based on ideas derived from religion. The scope of the paper would be limited to the reign of Akbar from 1556-1605 CE. Furthermore, the political theory as constructed by Abu’l Fazl would be considered to look at how religious notions shaped kingship. Akbar’s policy of religious tolerance based on principles of sulh-i kul or ‘Absolute peace’ and the imperial discipleship based on din-i ilahi or ‘Divine faith’ makes his reign more interesting as one sees the commix of existing notions and origin of newer ideas of symbolism and imperial authority making the empire robust for the coming centuries.
ANNALS OF SOCIAL SCIENCES AND PERSPECTIVE, 2020
Religious tolerance means that allow people to live their lives according to their personal beliefs, respect for other’s opinions, positively understand their ideas, given religious freedom. Unfortunately, there is a lot of religious intolerance in the world which causes many chaos and conflicts, especially the image of Islam became negative due to some terrorist activities. But Islam is the greatest revolution in the world which gives rights to everyone to live their life according to their beliefs. In the sub-continent, after the war of independence of 1857, the Hindus and Sikhs were creating great chaos for the Muslims. They made Muslim’s life worst even the Muslims could not live according to their teaching of Islam. So, religious tolerance is compulsory for everyone to live in peace even they are Muslims or not. The research by using the deductive method of research focuses on the policy of religious tolerance of great Mughal emperors that great Mughal emperors from Babur to Au...
Reimagining the Mughal Emperors Akbar and Aurangzeb in the 21st Century
Journal of South Asian Studies, 2021
The paper focuses on the reigns and policies of the two Mughal Emperors, Akbar and Aurangzeb, and analyses how they have been remembered in the wider social memory. While Akbar is glorified as a 'secular' and 'liberal' leader, Aurangzeb is often dismissed and ridiculed as a 'religious bigot', who tried to impose the Shari'ah law in diversified India. The paper traces and evaluates the construction of these two grand narratives which were initially formed by the British historians in colonial India and then continued by specific nationalist historians of India and Pakistan, after the independence of the two nation-states. By citing some of the most popular misconceptions surrounding the two Mughal Emperors, this study attempts to understand the policies of these two emperors in a wider socio-political narrative and attempts to deconstruct these ‘convenient’ misinterpretations. Concluding the analysis of how these two emperors are viewed differently in both...