The Importance of Affective-Kinetic Realities in the Experience of Trauma and in Trauma Therapy (original) (raw)

Abstract

In keeping with its epistemic derivation from Greek, the Oxford English Dictionary defines trauma as “A wound, or external bodily injury in general.” That definition has expanded and even shifted toward a more mental understanding of trauma, and correlatively toward “managing” those who are trauma-afflicted (1) or teaching them to “cope” with what has happened (2), whether a matter of shock, for example, on hearing of the death of a loved one or being in a car accident (1-2), or a matter of stress in terms of an overwhelming work load (3). The literature may prescribe therapy, but therapeutic help beyond strictly mental psychological help is warranted. Indeed, whatever its particular nature, trauma is bodily felt, which means that trauma is experienced in ways that affect the whole person, not simply his/her mental condition. A Jungian perspective on the unity of mind and body vindicates this basic understanding of trauma. The perspective leads to a detailed consideration and analysis of the startle reflex as both a whole person response and a temporal microcosm of experienced trauma. As such, it suggests a form of therapy anchored in movements directly antithetical to those of the startle reflex, thus offering a basis not only for exploring why movement is therapeutic, but for initiating integral mind-body forms of therapy. Keywords: Trauma therapy; Kinesthesia; Mind-body unity; Startle reflex; Dynamic congruency

Loading...

Loading Preview

Sorry, preview is currently unavailable. You can download the paper by clicking the button above.

References (27)

  1. Traumatic Events. Healthline. 2016.
  2. Coping with Traumatic Events. National Institute of Mental Health. 2020.
  3. Kent J, Thornton M, Fong A, Hall E, Fitzgibbons S, et al (2020) Acute provider stress in high stakes medical care: Implications for trauma surgeons. J Trauma Acute Care Surg 88: 440-445
  4. Perspective on the unity of mind and body and its relevance to 21st-century politics. Psychother Politics Int 17: 1-13.
  5. Landis C, Hunt WA (1939) The Startle Pattern. New York: Farrar & Rinehart 85: 357-360.
  6. Jung CG (1970) The Spiritual problem of modern man In Civilization in transition. Princeton University Press 110: 74-94.
  7. Jung CG (1960) The Psychogenesis of mental disease, trans. Bollingen Series 3: 5-8.
  8. Jung CG (1968) The Archetypes and the collective unconscious, trans. RFC Hull, Bollingen Series 20, Collected Works. Princeton University Press 9: 115-120.
  9. Jung CG (1969) On the Nature of the psyche. RFC Hull, Bollingen Series 20, Collected works. Princeton: Princeton University Press. 8: 1-10.
  10. Jung CG (1970) Civilization in transition. RFC Hull, Bollingen Series 20,Collected. Princeton: Princeton University Press. 10:6-16.
  11. Gallagher S (2005) How the body shapes the mind. Oxford: Clarendon Press 40: 5-15
  12. Gallagher S, Zahavi D (2012) The Phenomenological Mind. New York: Routledge 2: 1-15
  13. Gibbs JRW. (2006) Embodiment and cognitive science, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 5: 5-15
  14. Hanna R, Thompson E (2003) Neurophenomenology and the spontaneity of consciousness. In the problem of consciousness: New essays in phenomenological philosophy of mind, ed. Evan Thompson, Calgary: University of Calgary Press 5:133-161.
  15. Jensen RT, Moran D (2013) The Phenomenology of embodied subjectivity (contributions to phenomenology. New York: Springer Publishing 71: 5-16.
  16. Varela FJ, Depraz N (2005) At the source of time: Valence and the constitutional dynamics of affect. Journal of Consciousness Studies 12: 61-81.
  17. Varela FJ, Thompson E, Rosch E (1991) The Embodied Mind: Cognitive science and human experience. Cambridge MA: MIT Press 91:1-23.
  18. Vesey GNA (1965) The Embodied mind: A Philosophical investigation of the unity of mind and body experienced in voluntary movement and bodily sensation. London:George Allen 26: 525-568
  19. Zahavi D (2005) Subjectivity and selfhood: investigating the first- person perspective. Cambridge, MA 5: 1-6
  20. Sheets-Johnstone M (2015) Embodiment on trial: A phenomenological investigation. Continental Philosophy Review 48: 23-35
  21. Jeannerod M (2006) Motor Cognition: What actions Tell the Self. (1stedn), Oxford University Press, Oxford, England.
  22. Sheets-Johnstone M (2020) The body subject: Being true to the truths of experience. Journal of Speculative Philosophy 34: 1-28.
  23. Sheets-Johnstone M (2011) The Primacy of Movement (2nd edn), John Benjamins Publishing,Amsterdam, Philadelphia.
  24. Sheets-Johnstone M (1999) Emotion and movement: A beginning empirical-phenomenological analysis of their relationship. Journal of Consciousness Studies. 5: 259-277.
  25. Sheets-Johnstone M (2018) Why tactility, kinesthesia, and affectivity matter: Critical and constructive perspectives. Body and Society 24: 3-31.
  26. Sheets-Johnstone M (2010) Why is movement therapeutic. American Journal of Dance Therapy 32: 2-15.
  27. Payne H, Koch S, Tantia J, Fuchs T (2019) The Routledge International Handbook of Embodied Perspectives in Psychotherapy. London & New York 21: 5-15.