"Rethinking Diversity in Academic Institutions: For a Repoliticization of Difference as a Matter of Social Justice" (original) (raw)
Related papers
Migrants, Refugees, and “Diversity” at German Universities: A Grounded Theory Analysis
Boston College, 2020
The current displacement crisis in the German context has focused scholarly attention on refugee student access to higher education. However, much less research has attended to supports at higher education institutions (HEIs) for enrolled migrant and refugee students. In fact, education research in the German setting rarely focuses on students from any migrant background, though these students comprise between 20-25% of all German tertiary enrollment. This study uses Constructivist Grounded Theory (Charmaz, 2014) and a postcolonial lens to analyze "equal opportunity" plans and programs at 32 German HEIs across all 16 federal states. Data sources include the "equal opportunity plan" unique to each HEI (Gleichstellungsplan) and interviews with "equal opportunity office" (Gleichstellungsbüro) faculty and staff. Key findings include a bureaucratization and numerification of diversity in the German case, as well as an almost exclusive focus on diversity as gender. This dissertation offers a potentially transferable theoretical model, which may be relevant in national settings with increasingly diverse student populations, histories of colonial possession or fantasy, or primarily public higher education
German) Academia and White Supremacy
Current Objectives of Postgraduate American Studies, 2020
This collaboration extends the discussions of white supremacy to the space of German academia by offering personal reminiscences and reflections on experiences as a Black and as a white scholar in this system.
Race, Class and Gender at German Universities: A Round Table Discussion
Beyond the Master's Tools?: Decolonizing Knowledge Orders, Research Methods, 2020
While there have been ongoing discussions on gender in German tertiary institutions (though restricted to issues of gender mainstreaming), the engagement with structural racism in their administration, teaching and recruitment practices is still absent. Likewise, class relations which tend to not be subsumed under labels such as "equity" or "diversity" have continued to characterise the German tertiary education sector, despite the reforms in the 1970s. What are the correlations between the (lacking) engagement with racism and debates on gender and class? What are the effects of the increasingly competitive regulation of universities regarding specific power formations and democratic processes? And which practical coping strategies and forms of political intervention can be developed from different positions of marginalisation? These and other questions were put to a round table of five scholars by Jan Hutta, a member of the editorial team of sub/urban, a German journal for critical urban studies. All participants have conducted research on the various facets of race, class and gender relations in tertiary institutions in Germany (and beyond). Encarnación Gutiérrez Rodríguez, Kien Nghi Ha, Emily Ngubia Kessé, Mike Laufenberg and Lars Schmitt have all experienced these power relations in their respective biographical and work-related contexts and have issued several publications1 on these aspects, serving as an ideal point of departure for this exchange. The conversation took place on an online pad over the period of one month after an opening question was posed to all participants. At several stages during the conversation, different conversation strands emerged, and the conversation soon took on a complex non-linear course that has been edited for structure and coherence. During this process, it became clear that the conversations that began at this round table needed to be continued. The following conversation has been slightly abridged.
Diversity and superdiversity in between policy and academia: a critical reading
16th Annual IMISCOE Conference, June 2019, Malmö.
Focusing at its starting point on the emergence of the concept of (super)diversity in policy and academia, that has been cast by a growing body of literature as a “diversity turn,” this paper offers to challenge some of the theoretical and epistemic innovations claimed by this set of new analytical tools (Vertovec 2007). First, it critically engages the main features of innovation by replacing them in a broader context of an assumed “return of assimilation” (Brubaker 2001), a multicultural backlash spanning the decade 2000s, and a posited new global era of so-called “postracialism”. Second, it examines other sources of criticism, based for instance on empirical scrutiny and evidence from public policy analysis in three main policy domains: migration, urban studies, and anti-discrimination. Finally, while hypothesizing the advent of white diversity concepts, especially in the French and European settings, I question the possibility of mobilizing the diversity framework critically, namely through a deeper articulation with the perspective of non-discrimination.
Social Inclusion, 2021
This article focuses on the public German higher education sector as a site upon and through which coloniality is enacted. This status quo indicates exclusionary effects and merits interrogation. We briefly discuss the history of German colonialism to understand how coloniality pervades higher educational structures in the German context today. Two proposals addressing coloniality in German higher education are made: the development of structures centering diverse faculty and the support of ethnic and identity studies.
A Treatise on Diversity in a Dominant Culture University
The International Journal of Diversity in Education, 2013
The authors examine progress in strengthening the Diversity agenda in a school of education within a private Christian university. This agenda is informed by external academic accrediting organizations and principles of social justice congruent with the historical roots of the university. Special emphasis is placed on the unique challenges of confronting how privilege manifests itself in seemingly homogeneous environments. The ultimate goal of the authors is to promote moving beyond cosmetic compliance with accreditation obligations towards a metabolized second order change reflecting internal paradigm shifts in which social justice is a central motivating factor in one's vocation.
Higher Education, 2022
Inspired by neo-institutional theory, we explore whether the semantics of diversity appears to be global and universal through computer-assisted content analysis of 2378 publications. Diversity discourses are dominant, but only in the USA and Canada, UK and Ireland and Europe, not being present in Asia, Africa, the Middle East and Latin America. Diversity is interpreted differently across regions influenced by the local socio-political settings. Academic literature on diversity first appeared in the USA and Canada in the mid-1970s in relation to race and gender. In other English-speaking countries, diversity gained momentum only in the mid-2000s, with inclusion, gender, ethnicity and cultural diversity being the dominant terminologies. Later in that decade, diversity appeared in the academic literature in Europe, often framed as inclusion and gender. We did not find any evidence that the semantics of diversity has become global or universal and, therefore, question the cultural globalisation and the worldwide standardisation of academic knowledge around the valorisation of individual and collective differences.
Engaging with Diversity in European Universities
HAL (Le Centre pour la Communication Scientifique Directe), 2022
Una Europa established its Diversity Council to fuel the transformation towards more diverse and inclusive university communities that are to change the future world. Diversity-promoting equity and social justice to end discrimination and to foster inclusion-is the foundation on which a Una community is built. Guided by this approach, the current report summarises the work of the Diversity Council and its four Action Groups on data collection, research, education and sharing good practices, bringing together the key findings and recommendations on diversity across all Una Europa universities. Reflecting on and exploring the ways in which Una Europa and other European universities can embed diversity in their practices, the report consists of five parts: 1. An introduction to the role of the Diversity Council within Una Europa, and its main aims and goals; 2. The Diversity Council's definition of diversity for Una Europa; 3. The key findings and recommendations of the four Action Groups; 4. Students' views, including the Student Challenge on Diversity and the Affordably Abroad initiative; and 5. A conclusion, with key findings, lessons learned and future steps. The report supports building a more diverse Una Europa and, by extension, a European Higher Education space with potential impact on civil society and stakeholders. In this space, all members may feel safe, express themselves as they are and be acknowledged as valuable contributors to the advance of European social, cultural and economic progress and wealth. Key overall findings and recommendations 1. Ground the work of each university community and alliance on the progressive definition of diversity in all its dimensions to ensure a common basis for efficient work on diversity in each Una Europa university. 2. Make the most of the Diversity Council. Involve the Diversity Council in overall strategy work and planning, and clarify its role in the university community and network. Include diversity professionals in developing projects, programmes and initiatives. 3. Establish specific sets of actions linked to the overall strategy to mainstream diversity and create evidence-based and targeted actions that translate value-based commitments into action. A monitored and assessed overarching diversity strategy supports this mainstreaming process. a. Work with a diverse group from the start. Build diversity into governance and make it an institutional priority. Involve the target groups in the design, implementation and monitoring of the actions concerning them. b. Ensure constant financial support for diversity work in order to achieve the targeted aims. Promoting diversity needs to be given proper resources in terms of people, expertise, skills and time. c. Promote and evaluate training actions (for staff) to embed diversity. Encourage the recruiting of more dedicated and trained staff and strengthen the mentoring and training of both new and existing staff. d. Develop strategies of communication. Develop internal and external communication of policies and initiatives in order to promote awareness and engagement. Use interventions across Una Europa to promote diversity. Share best practices for improving diversity. 4. Set up regular evaluations of each existing policy and practice. Ensure routine data collection to generate needed information for strategy assessment. Follow up on progress against established performance indicators and develop tools to assess how diversity becomes mainstreamed.