A comparative analysis of cloud computing services using multicriteria decision analysis methodologies. International Journal of Information and Decision Sciences, 7 (1), 51-70 (original) (raw)
Related papers
International Journal of Information and Decision Sciences, 2015
Cloud computing is changing rapidly the way users perceive the use of computer functions and resources as well as it enables the development of more complex business models. New issues emerged by this ongoing trend, especially by privacy advocates as regards to the way cloud services providers control totally the communication and data exchanged between them and the users. It is however generally considered a reliable way to add features to the existing technical capabilities and to increase business capacity on the fly without at the same time making costly new investments in IT infrastructures. This paper focuses on the users' perspectives towards the most popular free services providers; goal programming techniques assessed the weighs of the selected criteria in order to implement multi-criteria methodologies. The results provided an opportunity to gain insights on the users' demands and expectations and to evaluate the level of trust towards these new services.
Case Study in Business and Management, 2017
The aim of this paper is to offer an applicable evaluation framework relating to the right choice of one's profession via his/her studies. The first part of the paper consists of the basic principles of Multicriteria Decision Making. To begin with, the paper initially focuses on the Macbeth Method. This helps to provide a perspective for procedural types of decisions in which various qualitative and quantitative aspects are incorporated. In the second part of the paper, the above-mentioned multicriteria method is applied to a " real-world " case concerning a specific case of a student, Eva. For this specific study, it is concluded that the factors of greatest importance that lead to choosing the University Eva finally chose, were four: the cost of undergraduate studies, the reputation-status of the University, its logistics and infrastructure and its interconnections with other Universities and other Academic Institutions.
Ekonomski horizonti, 2018
Multicriteria analysis and its methods have developed very rapidly in the last few decades. Basically, multicriteria analysis deals with solving unstructured management problems and, in practical terms, facilitates making an optimal decision. In order to make a good decision, however, it is necessary to specify possible alternatives by defining appropriate criteria. Multicriteria analysis belongs to the decisionmaking field, where the following meet: economics, mathematics, statistics, psychology, sociology, organizational theory, philosophy, information technology and other sciences.
On Some Advancements within Certain Multicriteria Decision Making Support Methodology
American Journal of Business and Management, 2013
Deriving true priority vectors from intuitive pairwise comparison matrices (PCMs) and consistency measurement of decision makers judgments about their genuine weights are crucial issues within the multicriteria decision making support methodology called Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP). The most popular procedure in the ranking process, constitutes the Right Eigenvector Method (REV). The inventor of the AHP convinces that as long as inconsistent PCMs are allowed in the AHP none of the other existing procedures qualify and the REV provides the only right solution in this process. The objective of this scientific paper is to examine if the former opinion can be considered as experimentally confirmed. For this purpose it was decided to apply Monte Carlo methodology. However, rather than simulate and analyze simulations results for a single PCM, as it has been done so far by many other authors, we decided to design and analyze computer simulations results for a singular model of the AHP framework. Our findings lead to inevitable conclusion that the REV cannot longer be perceived as a dominant procedure within the AHP methodology, especially when nonreciprocal PCMs are considered. It was verified empirically in our research that in the situation when nonreciprocal PCMs are considered the REV impoverishes the entire AHP methodology by its lack of PCMs inconsistency measure in such cases. Moreover, it provides less accurate rankings for a particular decision in comparison to other presented methods. It was also unequivocally verified that the enforced reciprocity of PCM leads directly to worse estimates of priorities weights. Altogether, it seems very important from the perspective of methodology supporting multicriteria decision making, the crucial process embedded in most of management activity. In the consequence, because the REV recedes other prioritization procedures available for the AHP methodology, it is advised to consider them instead, especially under some circumstances of an important and very tight managerial decisions.
Multicriteria Decision Analysis: State of the Art Surveys
2018
Multicriteria analysis and its methods have developed very rapidly in the last few decades. Basically, multicriteria analysis deals with solving unstructured management problems and, in practical terms, facilitates making an optimal decision. In order to make a good decision, however, it is necessary to specify possible alternatives by defining appropriate criteria. Multicriteria analysis belongs to the decisionmaking field, where the following meet: economics, mathematics, statistics, psychology, sociology, organizational theory, philosophy, information technology and other sciences.
Multicriteria Decision Making software products a comparison and ranking in terms of
2015
A large number of multi criteria decision making (MCDM) software products have been developed in academia and business. The selection of the appropriate MCDM software product to solve a given decision problem is a difficult task. Users need adequate MCDM software that meets quality standards regarding usability and functionality, utility, reliability and computer efficiency. In this paper we make a comparison of six MCDM software products regarding usability and functional suitability. Then we rank the MCDM software products included in comparison, first for criteria of usability and functionality and second only for criteria of usability. Ranking the six MCDM software products is a multi-criteria problem itself.
Decision Making in Multicriteria Environment: a Quantitative Approach
2005
It was V.V. Podinovski who began to investigate the relative importance of criteria in 70 th. vi Formulas, illustrations, and statements have double numeration, where the first number is that of the chapter. The symbol ■ marks the end of proof. The author thanks Irina Tolstykh who played an appreciable role in improvement of representation. Moreover, she made a contribution to a content; namely, Theorem 4.10 belongs to her. Special thanks to the Russian Fund for Basic Research for financial support since 1998. Saint Petersburg Vladimir Noghin vii Contents 3 Relative importance of two groups of criteria 3.1 Main notions and its properties 3.2 Use of information on relative importance 3.3 Three-criteria problem: a geometric illustration 4 Compound information on relative importance 4.1 Use of compound information: simple cases 4.2 Consistency of compound information 4.3 Use of compound information 4.4 Algorithmic approach 5 Completeness of compound information 5.1 Preliminary consideration 5.2 First completeness theorem viii 5.3 Second completeness theorem 6 Decision making methodology based on compound information on relative importance 6.1 How a person makes a choice? 6.2 Successive reduction of the Pareto set 6.3 Combined methods F. Edgeworth and V. Pareto Bibliography Index * This one is a correction of some definition by V.V. Podinovski (1978).
Multi-Criteria Decision Support Systems. Comparative Analysis
In a highly competitive business environment the right decision may bring success to a company while the wrong one may lead to collapse. Making the right choice is a difficult task, especially if there are multiple criteria. Therefore companies to remain competitive in a highly-demanding market have to know how to make decisions right. This article aims to compare existing computerized multi-criteria decision support systems and provide recommendations on implementing them in Kazakhstan. Analysis includes review of multi-objective decision making methods and tools available to facilitate the work of decision makers, selection a group of DSS software to study, comparing the key characteristics of selected multi-criteria DSSs, identifying the best alternative(s) and providing final recommendations for accepting such tools by decision makers in Kazakhstan. Authors of the article have selected and analyzed 10 decision-making software packages and developed their suggestions on adopting them in Kazakhstan. Results and conclusion were summarized in the article.
Decision Making Using Multicriteria Analysis: A Case Study of Decision Modeling Career in Education
Case Studies in Business and Management
The aim of this paper is to offer an applicable evaluation framework relating to the right choice of one’s profession via his/her studies. The first part of the paper consists of the basic principles of Multicriteria Decision Making. To begin with, the paper initially focuses on the Macbeth Method. This helps to provide a perspective for procedural types of decisions in which various qualitative and quantitative aspects are incorporated. In the second part of the paper, the above-mentioned multicriteria method is applied to a “real-world” case concerning a specific case of a student, Eva. For this specific study, it is concluded that the factors of greatest importance that lead to choosing the University Eva finally chose, were four: the cost of undergraduate studies, the reputation-status of the University, its logistics and infrastructure and its interconnections with other Universities and other Academic Institutions.
Information System Evaluation based on Multi-Criteria Decision Making: A Comparison of Two Sectors
International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications, 2018
In this article, our purpose is to introduce the results of a new approach to assess the information system success. It is based on the DeLone and McLean model and was applied on two domains. The chosen domains are banking sector being the most customer of information technology and construction industry as the least computer-intensive sector. The work methodology used to evaluate the information system performance is a combined approach of the two most popular multi-criteria decision making techniques: AHP and TOPSIS. Based on the results of this technique applied on studied sectors, we can obtain a horizontal comparison at the sector level and optimize the choice of the best system.