Revisionism and Resecuritization of Turkey's Middle East Policy: A Neoclassical Realist Explanation (original) (raw)
Related papers
This article seeks to test the relevance of neoclassical realism in explaining the foreign policy behavior of a regional power in an era of turbulent change in the regional system. Taking Turkey's policy response to the Arab Uprisings as a case study, it tries to explain, from a neoclassical realist perspective, the causes of Ankara's miscalculations while formulating an ambitious policy in 2011, as well as its failure to adapt to the new realities on the ground between 2013 and 2016. Overall, it argues that neoclassical realism provides a satisfying explanation for Turkey's policy failure in this period, and that the problems of miscalculation and maladaptation in Turkish foreign policy were caused by distortive effects of certain unit-level factors. In this sense, while ideological tendencies of the ruling Justice and Development Party, as well as its consolidation of domestic power, shaped the content and styling of Ankara's policy response after 2011, the extensive utilization of foreign policy for domestic purposes by the ruling party hindered Turkey's adaptation to shifting balances in the regional power structure between 2013 and 2016.
The Analysis of Turkish Foreign Policy in Syria: A Neoclassical Realist Perspective
Przegląd Strategiczny
Since 2011, the Syrian Civil War has become an arena of international competition between regional and global powers. As a dominant regional actor, Turkey has important interests in this conflict. However, although great importance is given to civil war factors and power balances at the field level, Turkey’s internal conditions play a role as well as these externalities. Therefore, an analysis of Turkey’s foreign policy towards Syria from a local perspective is needed to reveal some negligible dynamics. In this direction, this study aims to analyse Turkey’s foreign policy towards Syria, taking into account the interaction between Turkey’s external and internal dynamics within the framework of neoclassical realist theory. Within this scope, we ask “how do Turkish external and internal dynamics explain its foreign policy in Syria?” as the leading search question and conduct our analysis using the explanatory case study method. Based on our findings, we provide a broad perspective on t...
This research seeks to examine the rationale behind the ‘new’ Turkish foreign policy orientation in recent years. To this end, it argues that the Turkish foreign policy is readjusting itself to the changes in the international political structure. To prove this, it extrapolates the main underpinnings of Kenneth Waltz’s neorealist thinking and applies them to Turkish foreign policy behaviour. Further, it augments the explanatory power of the theories using insights from the soft power approach that Joseph Nye emphasized. With the theoretical framework provided, this research assesses the change and continuity patterns that the Turkish foreign policy demonstrated since the late 1990s.
Managing Change and Continuity in Turkish foreign policy: A neoclassical realist assessment
This paper explores recent scholarship on the connection between domestic level variables and external factors in shaping foreign policy behaviour. Turkey presents itself as an excellent case through which to explore this puzzle given the combination of strong systemic constraints on its strategic policy, combined with a rapidly changing domestic discourse. Here, the shift away from the ideology of Kemalism and towards a 'neo-Ottoman' agenda over the past decade has run parallel to dramatic shifts in regional power. 1 I argue that these systemic factors can be linked to various patterns of behaviour by state elites, and develop a neoclassical realist framework which outlines three specific behaviours that point to this process.
A bridge over troubled waters? Turkey Middle Eastern policy and the West
Drawing from Samuel Huntington’s definition of “torn country” and relying on a social-constructivist approach, this paper explains the recent sea change in Turkey’s Middle Eastern policy as a result of the confrontation and interaction between two competing visions of the Turkish state: Kemalism and Neo-ottomanism. Turkey’s assertiveness in the Middle East under the Justice and Development Party’s (AKP) leadership is not a simple structural adjustment to new systemic constraints – the post-Cold War and post-9/11 international system, as a copious neo-realist literature has suggested. Rather, it results from a deeper process of identity change having profound domestic and international implications. From an empirical standpoint, this paper makes sense of Turkey’s engagement in its own previously neglected neighbourhood, and draws implications for its relations with the West and, in particular, with the European Union. Theoretically, the paper seeks to demonstrate that identities and perceptions matter in influencing states’ foreign policy preferences and behaviour.
Approaches to Turkish Foreign Policy: A Critical Realist Analysis
Turkish Studies, Vol 15, Issue 1, 2014, pp. 117-138
ABSTRACT This article analyses different approaches to Turkish foreign policy (TFP) from a critical realist perspective. It seeks to criticize positivist and post-positivist approaches to TFP, arguing for a non-reductionist, historical materialist approach based on the principles of critical realism. It argues that historical materialist approaches are missing both from the analysis of TFP and from the mainstream foreign-policy analysis in general. In emphasizing the importance of a historical materialist approach, the paper also underlines the importance of acknowledging the structural context of foreign policy-making as a complement to the agent-centric, micro-level analyses that dominate the mainstream TFP analysis. Finally, it advocates a research agenda that focuses on the development of a historical materialist approach to TFP
Turkey's Erratic Policy in the Middle East
European Journal of Transformation Studies, 2019
In a neorealist approach to the subject, this paper argues that decreases within the harmony of structural, institutional and individual levels within the state (in our case, Turkey), will eventually lead to a less and less successful foreign policy. The article explores Turkey’s dyadic foreign relations primarily with Syria before and after the Arab spring, concentrating on the period of 2011 to 2017 (for comparative reasons, we have included Turkey-USA, Turkey-Saudi Arabia and Turkey-Iran relations within the research as well). It shows the slow degradation and increased lack of success within Turkey’s foreign policy during the ongoing decade.
A Companion to Modern Turkey's Centennial (Edinburgh University Press, 2023)
Modern Turkey’s engagement with the Middle East was largely driven by defensive Realpolitik until the end of the twentieth century. This is why scholars have been puzzled with the increasing militarization and offensiveness of Turkish foreign policy, particularly in the Middle East, as well as severing ties with the US-led Western alliance in the 21st century. The debates have been centered on the ideological choices (neo-Ottoman and Islamist) of the ruling Justice and Development Party (AKP in Turkish) since 2002 in the leadership of Recep Tayyip Erdogan. This chapter will broadly outline Turkey’s engagement with the Middle East since the early Republic and discuss the main continuities and ruptures until today.
Ideologies and the Western Question in Turkish Foreign Policy: A Neo-classical Realist Perspective
2020
Growing anti-Western sentiments around the world are currently manifesting themselves through divergent ways ranging from peaceful resistance movements to various forms of political violence. In the Middle East, unlike the earlier partially secular and nationalist Cold War anti-Americanism, the current popular anti-Western political movements are heavily equipped with Islamism, which appears to be an all-inclusive ideology and political movement for almost all dissidents. This applies to Turkey as well, despite its relatively long history of secularisation. This research particularly aims therefore to discuss the role of nationalism and Islamism on anti-Western sentiments in Turkish foreign policy through the lens of neo-classical realism and a new, broader conceptual framework: The Western Question. The research examines the contours, contents, and consequences of the problem through comparing two cases, namely the Cyprus problem of the 1970s and the crisis with the West that has surfaced after Turkey's involvement in the Syrian Civil War.