Discovering outstanding subgroup lists for numeric targets using MDL (original) (raw)

Robust subgroup discovery

2021

We introduce the problem of robust subgroup discovery, i.e., finding a set of interpretable descriptions of subsets that 1) stand out with respect to one or more target attributes, 2) are statistically robust, and 3) non-redundant. Many attempts have been made to mine either locally robust subgroups or to tackle the pattern explosion, but we are the first to address both challenges at the same time from a global modelling perspective. First, we formulate the broad model class of subgroup lists, i.e., ordered sets of subgroups, for univariate and multivariate targets that can consist of nominal or numeric variables, and that includes traditional top-1 subgroup discovery in its definition. This novel model class allows us to formalise the problem of optimal robust subgroup discovery using the Minimum Description Length (MDL) principle, where we resort to optimal Normalised Maximum Likelihood and Bayesian encodings for nominal and numeric targets, respectively. Second, as finding optimal subgroup lists is NP-hard, we propose SSD++, a greedy heuristic that finds good subgroup lists and guarantees that the most significant subgroup found according to the MDL criterion is added in each iteration, which is shown to be equivalent to a Bayesian one-sample proportions, multinomial, or t-test between the subgroup and dataset marginal target distributions plus a multiple hypothesis testing penalty. We empirically show on 54 datasets that SSD++ outperforms previous subgroup set discovery methods in terms of quality and subgroup list size.

An overview on subgroup discovery: Foundations and applications

2010

Abstract Subgroup discovery is a data mining technique which extracts interesting rules with respect to a target variable. An important characteristic of this task is the combination of predictive and descriptive induction. An overview related to the task of subgroup discovery is presented. This review focuses on the foundations, algorithms, and advanced studies together with the applications of subgroup discovery presented throughout the specialised bibliography.

Subgroup Discovery in Machine Learning Problems with Formal Concepts Analysis and Test Theory Algorithms

Algorithms

A number of real-world problems of automatic grouping of objects or clustering require a reasonable solution and the possibility of interpreting the result. More specific is the problem of identifying homogeneous subgroups of objects. The number of groups in such a dataset is not specified, and it is required to justify and describe the proposed grouping model. As a tool for interpretable machine learning, we consider formal concept analysis (FCA). To reduce the problem with real attributes to a problem that allows the use of FCA, we use the search for the optimal number and location of cut points and the optimization of the support set of attributes. The approach to identifying homogeneous subgroups was tested on tasks for which interpretability is important: the problem of clustering industrial products according to primary tests (for example, transistors, diodes, and microcircuits) as well as gene expression data (collected to solve the problem of predicting cancerous tumors). Fo...

Analysis of Example Weighting in Subgroup Discovery by Comparison of Three Algorithms on a Real-life Data Set

This paper investigates the implications of example weight- ing in subgroup discovery by comparing three state-of-the-art subgroup discovery algorithms, APRIORI-SD, CN2-SD, and SubgroupMiner on a real-life data set. While both APRIORI-SD and CN2-SD use example weighting in the process of subgroup discovery, SubgroupMiner does not. Moreover, APRIORI-SD uses example weighting in the post-processing step of selecting the 'best' rules, while CN2-SD uses example weighting during rule induction. The results of the application of the three subgroup discovery algorithms on a real-life data set { the UK Trac challenge data set are presented in the form of ROC curves showing that APRIORI- SD slightly outperforms CN2-SD; both APRIORI-SD and CN2-SD are good in nding small and highly accurate subgroups (describing minority classes), while SubgroupMiner found larger and less accurate subgroups (describing the majority class). We show by using ROC analysis that these results are not surp...