The Confusing Confucian Disagreement on Human Nature (original) (raw)
AI-generated Abstract
This thesis examines the disagreement between Xunzi and Mencius regarding the nature of human xing (性), specifically whether it is inherently good. Through an analysis of their philosophical positions, it argues that while Xunzi appears to contradict Mencius' view that human nature is good, the disagreement may not be as clear-cut as traditionally interpreted. The reinterpretation of terms used by both philosophers suggests that despite their different views on the innate goodness of xing, there exists a nuanced understanding of how individuals can attain goodness through deliberate effort and learning.
Sign up for access to the world's latest research.
checkGet notified about relevant papers
checkSave papers to use in your research
checkJoin the discussion with peers
checkTrack your impact
Related papers
Mencius and Xunzi on Xing 性 (Human Nature)
Philosophy Compass
This article introduces and analyses the debate between Mencius and Xunzi on xing 性 (human nature). While Mencius claims that xing is good, Xunzi claims that xing is bad. A common way of interpreting these two different claims is to determine the scope of xing. It is generally agreed that, for Mencius, it is the heart/mind that falls within the scope of xing, for Xunzi, the sensory desires. This article also explores a different way of approaching Mencius's and Xunzi's different claims about xing. It is suggested that Mencius's and Xunzi's different views on xing can be understood in terms of their different views on the heart/mind (xin 心). While Mencius thinks that the heart/mind has a morally good natural tendency, Xunzi thinks that the heart/mind has a morally problematic tendency.
The Mencian Theory of Human Xing Reconsidered 1
Journal of Chinese Philosophy, 1999
ANNOUNCEMENT (1) Human Xing has a normative property, this being indicated by the uses of the terms "good" or "goodness" in the Menciur and directly stated in the thesis that "Human Xing Good".
2012
Confucius was an extremely influential figure in Chinese culture. He was born around 551 B.C.E. and lived a long and full life before his death around 479. He is thought to have been the first man in China to devote his life to teaching and the first to encourage education for all people. As with many great figures from antiquity, little about his life is known for certain and the few facts that we do have available have become intermingled with myth. One fact is certain-his work and example became a cornerstone of Chinese thought. His texts were taught in the Chinese schools and were the basis of their civil service examinations from 1313 until 1905.
(2012) "Xunzi and Han Fei on Human Nature." International Philosophical Quarterly 52 (2):135-148
It is commonly accepted that Han Fei studied under Xunzi sometime during the late third century BCE. However, there is surprisingly little dedicated to the in-depth study of the relationship between Xunzi’s ideas and one of his best-known followers. In this essay I argue that Han Fei’s notion of xing, commonly translated as human nature, was not only influenced by Xunzi but also that it is an important feature of his political philosophy.
Human Nature and Moral Cultivation in the Guodian Text of the Xing Zi Ming Chu
The debate over whether human nature is good or bad and how this is related to self-cultivation was central in the minds of traditional Chinese thinkers. This essay analyzes the interrelationship between the key concepts of xing 性(human nature), qing 情(human emotions/feelings), and xin 心(heart-mind) in the Guodian text of the Xing Zi Ming Chu 性自命出(Nature Derives from Mandate) discovered in 1993 in Hubei province. The intellectual engagements evident in this Guodian text emerge as more syncretic and dynamic than those that can be found in the discourse of any single tradition, such as Gaozi, Mencius, or Xunzi. Its thesis on human nature and moral cultivation reveals the existence of a possibly more diverse intellectual discourse from which the different foci of philosophical debate represented by later thinkers developed.
Loading Preview
Sorry, preview is currently unavailable. You can download the paper by clicking the button above.