Are the people the masters? Constitutional Referendums in Ireland (original) (raw)

2021, Richard Albert and Richard Stacey (eds), The Limits and Legitimacy of Referendums (OUP 2021) FORTHCOMING

Abstract

According to some, we are now living in the ‘Age of the Referendum’. But the rise of the referendum is fraught with worry it will usher in a crude populism which will obliterate constitutional constraints and lead – ironically - to executive dominance, authoritarianism and deep forms of democratic decay. Therefore, whilst referendums hold out the promise of constitutional self-government, we need to be mindful of the pitfalls and problems they bring in their wake. In exploring the potential—and the pitfalls—of a democratic constitutionalist vision, Ireland offers a promising testing ground. On the surface, one might think that Ireland’s referendum process would fall victim to many of the common concerns about referendums. In initiation and formulation, the process is open to elite capture because the government gets to propose and formulate the referendum proposal which is put to the people. The process is purely majoritarian; 50% plus one of the voters on referendum day can approve any change. Any change can be proposed, however radical. Minority rights have been put to referendum vote. Ireland’s rules and regulation of campaign advertising and debate are loose and scant and seem unlikely to combat disinformation. Yet, when examined closely, Ireland stands as a counterpoint to many of the criticisms and fears which surround referendums. Elite dominance, though formally prevalent, is offset by a substantial role for civil society in initiation and campaigning. Bare majority vote is supplemented by widespread participation and deliberation, which appears to be nuanced and robust, whilst minority rights have been vindicated when voted on. The process has not been subject to political exploitation for sweeping or abusive constitutional change. Though the record is far from perfect, referendums work reasonably well in Ireland, commanding high levels of popular participation and engagement, which go well beyond the mere act of ratifying or rejecting a referendum proposal at the ballot box and extend to widespread, relatively well-informed and committed popular deliberation. During a constitutional referendum in Ireland, a national conversation takes place about what people want their Constitution to mean. As such, Ireland is a crucial case-study in exploring the promise - and perils - of constitutional referendums.

Loading...

Loading Preview

Sorry, preview is currently unavailable. You can download the paper by clicking the button above.

References (10)

  1. Gráinne de Burca, "Reinvigorating Democracy in the European Union: Lessons from Ireland's Citizens Assembly?" in Aleksandra Gliszczyńska-Grabias and Ulad Belavusau (eds), Liber Amicorum Wojciech Sadurski (OUP, 2020);
  2. Oran Doyle & Rachael Walsh, "Deliberative Mini-Publics as a Response to Populist Democratic Backsliding" in Maria Cahill, Colm O'Cinneide, Sean O Conaill & Conor O'Mahony (eds) Constitutional Change and Popular Sovereignty: Populism, Politics and the Law in Ireland (forthcoming).
  3. See Gráinne Healy, Brian Sheehan, and Noel Whelan, Ireland Says Yes: the Inside Story of How the Vote for Marriage Equality was won (Merrion Press, 2016) 17 et seq.
  4. David Farrell, Clodagh Harris & Jane Suiter, "Bringing People in the heart of Constitutional Design: The Irish Constitutional Convention of 2012-14" in Xenophon Contiades & Alkmene Fotiadou (eds), Participatory Constitutional Change: The People as Amenders of the Constitution (Routledge, 2017), 121. 47 Ibid 126-7. 48 Article 41.4.
  5. Geoffrey Marshall, "What are constitutional conventions?" (1985) 38(1) Parliamentary Affairs 33.
  6. See generally Marsh Michael, John Garry, Richard Sinnott "'Second Order' versus 'Issue-voting' effects in EU Referendums: Evidence from the Irish Nice Referendums" (2005) 6(2) European Union Politics 201; Catherine Lynch, Explaining the outcome of rejected referendums Oireachtas Library & Research Service Note, 23 rd February 2018, 5..
  7. Doyle (n 14) 199-200.
  8. For a retrospective on that referendum, see Fiona Gartland, "'Hello Divorce: Goodbye Daddy' 20 years after Irish said yes", Irish Times, 24 November 2015.
  9. Jane Suiter & Min Reuchamps, 'A Constitutional Turn for Deliberative Democracy in Europe?' in Reuchamps and Suiter (eds.) Constitutional Democracy in Europe (ECPR Press, 2016). 5. 131 Ibid; Doyle & Walsh (n 86).
  10. Central Statistics Office, 'Census 2016: Summary Results Part 1', chapter 5, available at https://www.cso.ie/en/media/csoie/newsevents/documents/census2016summaryresultspart1/Census2016Su mmaryPart1.pdf