Universal and Regional Approaches to Resolving International Water Disputes: What Lessons Learned From State Practice? (original) (raw)
Related papers
Journal of Contemporary Water Research & Education, 2015
W ater access, demand, usage, and management become complex because of many boundaries: political, social, and jurisdictional, as well as the physical, ecological and biogeochemical boundaries that operates in a specific context. While scientific formulation and engineering solutions are necessary to address complex water problems, societal and political contexts are also an integral part of long-term solutions. The most challenging water problems are framed within contested terrains in which various stakeholders compete to protect their own interests within frameworks created by political boundaries, markets, institutions, laws and social norms, in addition to scientific research and technological expertise. The origin of many complex water problems lies in the dynamic consequences of competition, interconnections and feedback that are spread across variables that operate in the knowledge and political communities. Consequently, science alone cannot solve complex water problems that involve policy issues, and policy ideas uninformed by science are no more effective. In this paper, we focus on a particular class of water problems: allocation of international water. Over 276 river basins cross national boundaries (TWAP 2013).
The Legal Response to International Water Conflicts: The UN Watercourses Convention and Beyond
GERMAN YEARBOOK OF INTERNATIONAL LAW, 1999
The UN Watercourses Convention, adopted in May 1997, and ratified to date by six Parties/ is a global framework agreement with the goal to "ensure the utilization, development, conservation, management and protection of international watercourses" and the promotion of their optimal and sustainable utilization for present and future generations. In line with this, the Convention requires that "an international watercourse shall be used and developed by watercourse States with a view to attaining optimal and sustainable utilization thereof and benefits therefrom, taking into account the interests of the watercourse States concerned, consistent with adequate protection of the watercourse." This paper addresses the question whether the UN Watercourses Convention facilitates achievement of these aims, specifically in the context of conflicts-of-uses and water scarcity.