Effects on growth of environmental policy in a small open economy (original) (raw)
Related papers
Environmental policy and sustainable economic growth
De Economist, 1995
This paper investigates the consequences of environmental policy for welfare, consumption and production growth in a situation in which environmental quality is initially too low. The natural environment is incorporated in endogenous growth theory in a way that is consistent with some simple notions from the laws of thermodynamics. Environmental policy affects growth, both in the long run and in the short run, by affecting the productivity of investment and the savings behavior of consumers. * I am indebted to L. Bovenberg, S. Cnossen, and Th. van de Klundert for useful comments.
The long-run effects of environmental reform in open economies
Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 2003
We compare the short-run and long-run effects of environmental reform and harmonization under autarky and free trade. When trade is driven by environmental distortions rather than real relative advantages, harmonization of environmental policies, even if achieved by lowering standards in one country, can improve short-run aggregate welfare. With the possibility of multiple steady states, long-run considerations favor a \race to the top" rather than a \race to the bottom" even when upward and downward harmonizations are equivalent in the short run. For a country trapped in a low (or bad) steady state, environmental reform may not move it to a high (or good) steady state under autarky. However, under trade, harmonization of policies may enable this country to reach the high steady state. Conversely, reforms that increase the relative differences in distortions may, under trade, cause economies to move toalow steady state.
Environmental protection and economic growth
2009
This paper explores the link between environmental policy and economic growth by employing an extension of the AK Growth Model. We include a state equation for renewable natural resources. We assume that the change in environmental regulations induces costs and that economic agents also derive some utility from capital stock accumulation vis-à-vis the environment. Using the Hopf bifurcation theorem, we show that cyclical environmental policy strategies are optimal, providing theoretical support for the Environmental Kuznets Curve.
Channels of transmission of environmental policy to economic growth: A survey of the theory
Ecological Economics, 2007
Economists generally hold that environmental regulations impose constraints on the production possibilities set and are therefore potentially harmful to economic growth. In recent years, however, it has been recognized that environmental regulation can enhance the prospects for growth if improved environmental quality increases the productivity of inputs or the efficiency of the education system. It is also held that environmental regulation promotes pollution abatement activity and can lead to the exploitation of increasing returns to scale in abatement. Furthermore, expectations of a better environment may encourage households to save. Finally, it has been conjectured that environmental regulations can stimulate innovation because R&D s a relatively clean activity and because the market share of clean innovations increases.
Economic Growth and the Dynamics of Environmental Quality1
Empirical studies suggest the existence of an environmental Kuznets curve: In the initial stages of economic development pollution increases, but eventually the trend is reversed and environmental quality rebounds. Previous efforts to model this phenomenon have relied upon the restrictive assumptions of intergenerational conflicts, ill-defined property rights or higher pollution intensity of more productive capital. This paper develops a simple neoclassical growth model that is free from these assumptions and provides a more general explanation of the evolution of economic growth and environmental quality based on the relative scarcity of capital. The model's predictions are consistent with the environmental Kuznets curve and two other empirical regularities: (i) during the initial stages of economic development, growth is high but there is negligible regulation and expenditures on environmental protection so that pollution levels rise; (ii) at later stages of economic development, better environmental quality is actively pursued, so that pollution is reduced, and economic growth rates are lower. We also show how a pollution tax or tradable permits can only implement the social optimal if accompanied by other taxes on consumption or profits. We solve for the time when environmental quality starts to improve and analyze its determinants. (JEL O13, Q20)
Pollution abatement and long-term growth
European Journal of Political Economy, 1996
This paper examines, first, the conditions under which sustained economic growth and the preservation of environmental quality are compatible and optimal, and, second, in what way economic growth is affected by environmental policy. A general equilibrium one-sector model is developed in which the environment is essential for production and welfare. The growth rate is endogenously determined. Pollution occurs as an inevitable by-product of economic activity but can be reduced by spending a fraction of total output on abatement activities.
Endogenous growth effects of environmental policies
Panoeconomicus, 2015
To analyse the impact of the environmental policies, we start by reviewing the literature on the environment, technological knowledge and economic growth. Then, we build a general equilibrium endogenous growth model where final goods are produced either in the skilled-labour intensive Clean sector or in the unskilled-labour intensive Unclean sector. By solving numerically transitional dynamics towards the unique and stable steady state, we observe that environmental policies encourage scale-invariant technological knowledge bias. This, in turn, promotes environmental quality, the skill premium and economic growth. Moreover, the impact of population growth on the steady-state growth rate is higher under strong households? environmental conscientiousness with future generations.
Journal of Economics Zeitschrift f�r National�konomie, 1993
The effects of increased environmentai care on optimal technology choice and long-term growth are studied for an economy in which pollution is a side-product of physical capital used in production. First, it is shown that in case of a standard neoclassical production structure, the result is a less capital-intensive production process whereas the long-run growth rate is not affected. Next, we introduce assumptions of the endogenous growth literature. When there are constant returns to physical capital, an increase in abatement activities crowds out investment and lowers the endogenous growth rate. When human capital accumulation is the engine of growth, physical capital intensity declines and the endogenous optimal growth rate is unaffected by increased environmental care or is even higher, depending on whether or not pollution influences agents' ability to learn.
Economic growth and the environment: Theory and facts
Resource and Energy Economics, 2008
Several recent papers propose competing theoretical explanations for the empirical observation of an inverted U-shape relationship between enviromental degradation and per-capita income. We proprose the following test of the theory: calibrate a theoretical model to an already developed economy using information unrelated to the pollution-income curve. Then simulate the model starting from a less developed initial condition and compare the predicted pollutionincome relationship with that in the data. Our results are mixed. Some support exists for the theory that the inverted U-shape results from a corner solution in which less developed countries do not abate pollution. However, pollution peaks at a level of per capita income that is much lower than that observed in the U.S. data.
Optimal Environmental Policy under Endogenous Terms of Trade and Economic Growth
Theoretical Economics Letters, 2014
The aim of this work is to depict the main characteristics of the optimal environmental policy under endogenous terms of trade and economic growth. Here, endogenous terms of trade are inferred from the price of an aggregate consumption good. Our results show that when emissions of a global pollutant affect the environment and, therefore, the utility of the economic agents, the optimal policy consists in a pollution tax on production.