The Impact of Mandatory Coverage on State and Local Budgets (original) (raw)
Related papers
This paper develops a model to examine the effects of introducing a partially or fully privatized social security system into an overlapping generations model with an extant payas-you-go system. Privatization is introduced through mutual funds that provide an actuarially fair annuity contract as part of a portfolio of assets that bears a random rate of return. We find that in the presence of this investment risk maintaining a portion of the payas-you-go system through a means-tested minimum retirement income guarantee may be welfare improving.
PSN: Pensions & Retirement (Topic), 2020
Federal law allows certain state and local governments to exclude employees from Social Security coverage if the employees are provided with a sufficiently generous pension. Approximately 6.5 million such workers were not covered by Social Security in 2018. Retirement systems for non-covered workers have become less generous in recent years, and a few plans could exhaust their trust funds within the next decade, putting beneficiaries at risk. This article examines data from a variety of sources to assess whether state and local governments currently satisfy the federal standards for retirement plan sufficiency and whether the standards ensure benefits equivalent to those from Social Security.
An Assessment of the Proposals of the President's Commission to Strengthen Social Security
SSRN Electronic Journal, 2002
The President's Commission to Strengthen Social Security proposed three reform plans. Two, analyzed here, restore actuarial balance in the absence of individual accounts. One achieves this balance solely through benefit reductions. The other uses new dedicated revenue to cover one-third of the actuarial deficit, reducing benefits to close the rest. Both plans cut disability and young survivor benefits in step with retirement benefits, while bolstering benefits for long-career low earners and surviving spouses with low benefits.
Social Security Policy in a Changing Environment
2000
of the NBER. We are grateful to the SSA for this support. We are also grateful to Dan Slack, Doug Steele, and other staff members at the State Universities Retirement System for their tireless efforts at providing us with the data for this project, as well as for helpful conversations and comments on the chapter. We thank Sarah Jackson for excellent research assistance.
Does Social Security Need Saving? Providing for Retirees throughout the Twenty-first Century
Projections of Social Security's future have led many to believe that a financial crisis looms for the system. This is an exaggeration-any problems are far down the road and are hardly important enough to justify the use of the word "crisis." It is correct to caution that something will have to be done to resolve some real and financial problems in providing for future retirees, but this does not necessarily mean that something has to be done today or that it is the Social Security system itself that lies at the heart of these problems.
SSRN Electronic Journal, 2000
By any measure, pension coverage should be at an all-time high: the nation is richer and workers are older. However, the pension world is a paradox, as pension security falls for middle-class workers and pension spending increases. The United States government directly and indirectly spends more than half a trillion dollars on the elderly each year. Direct spending is mainly through Social Security and indirect spending through the tax code's special treatment of employer and personal retirement plans. The tax favoritism is an astonishing one fourth of the direct spending. But the nature of the tax subsidy is changing. The tax subsidy for 401(k) plans, which are beneficial to employers and higher-income workers, is overtaking that for traditional pensions, which cover lower-income workers and help expand pension coverage. Since tax policy is designed to meet a public purpose, perhaps the more than $100 billion dollars per year spent indirectly on pensions could be better spent? Using tax expenditure data from the federal budget and data from both employers' surveys (the Chamber of Commerce and the National Compensation Survey) and workers' surveys (the Bureau of Census's Current Population Survey), this study reflects on alternative pension polices that transform the tax subsidy and expand Social Security and traditional pensions. Such a sharp change in federal policy may stem the loss of pension security of middle-class workers and expand it for lower-income workers.