Is Digital Rectal Exam Reliable in Grading Anal Sphincter Defects? (original) (raw)
Related papers
International Journal of Colorectal Disease, 2006
Background Anal inspection and digital rectal examination are routinely performed in fecal incontinent patients but it is not clear to what extent they contribute to the diagnostic work-up. We examined if and how findings of anal inspection and rectal examination are associated with anorectal function tests and endoanal ultrasonography. Methods A cohort of fecal incontinent patients (n=312, 90% females; mean age 59) prospectively underwent anal inspection and rectal examination. Findings were compared with results of anorectal function tests and endoanal ultrasonography. Results Absent, decreased and normal resting and squeeze pressures at rectal examination correlated to some extent with mean (±SD) manometric findings: mean resting pressure 41.3 (±20), 43.8 (±20) and 61.6 (±23) Hg (p<0.001); incremental squeeze pressure 20.6 (±20), 38.4 (±31) and 62.4 (±34) Hg (p<0.001). External anal sphincter defects at rectal examination were confirmed with endoanal ultrasonography for defects <90 degrees in 36% (37/103); for defects between 90-150 degrees in 61% (20/33); for defects between 150-270 degrees in 100% (6/6). Patients with anal scar tissue at anal inspection had lower incremental squeeze pressures (p=0.04); patients with a gaping anus had lower resting pressures (p=0.013) at anorectal manometry. All other findings were not related to any anorectal function test or endoanal ultrasonography. Conclusions Anal inspection and digital rectal examination can give accurate information about internal and external anal sphincter function but are inaccurate for determining external anal sphincter defects <90 degrees. Therefore, a sufficient diagnostic work-up should comprise at least rectal examination, anal inspection and endoanal ultrasonography.
International Urogynecology Journal, 2020
Introduction and hypothesis Our aim was to explore the association between anal incontinence (AI) and persistent anal sphincter defects diagnosed with 3D endoanal (EAUS), introital (IUS) and transperineal ultrasound (TPUS) in women after obstetric anal sphincter injury (OASI) and study the association between sphincter defects and anal pressure. Methods We carried out a cross-sectional study of 250 women with OASI recruited during the period 2013–2015. They were examined 6–12 weeks postpartum or in a subsequent pregnancy with 3D EAUS, IUS and TPUS and measurement of anal pressure. Prevalence of urgency/solid/liquid AI or flatal AI and anal pressure were compared in women with a defect and those with an intact sphincter (diagnosed off-line) using Chi-squared and Mann–Whitney U test. Results At a mean of 23.6 (SD 30.1) months after OASI, more women with defect than those with intact sphincters on EAUS had AI; urgency/solid/liquid AI vs external defect: 36% vs 13% and flatal AI vs inte...
Journal of Medical Ultrasonics, 2012
Purpose To assess the utility of transperineal threedimensional (3D) ultrasound for diagnosing anal sphincter defects and evaluating the function of the anal canal in women with anal incontinence. Methods The study subjects were 13 women with anal incontinence. Symptoms of fecal incontinence were assessed by Wexner score. The anal canal of each woman was examined ultrasonically with both a convex transperineal 3D scanner and a radial transanal scanner to compare the accuracy of the two approaches for diagnosis of anal sphincter defects. The anorectal angle and the length of the anal canal were also measured by utilizing the functionality of the transperineal 3D ultrasound. Results The mean age was 58.9 ± 14.9 years (±SD), and the mean Wexner score was 8.4 ± 5.6. In terms of ultrasound diagnosis of anal sphincter defects, the two methods showed consistent results in each woman. The length of the portion where both the internal and external anal sphincters were intact was significantly correlated with the Wexner score, whereas the total length of the anal canal was not. Conclusions Less invasive transperineal 3D ultrasound provides accurate evaluation of the internal and external anal sphincters in women with anal incontinence, and the method is potentially useful for detection of anal sphincter abnormalities.
Surgical Endoscopy, 2004
Background: Perineal body thickness (PBT) is measured by endoanal ultrasonography. The literature has shown that women with obstetric trauma to the anal sphincter have decreased PBT, and a measurement of 10 mm or less has been proposed as abnormal. Therefore, this study aimed to compare the proposed definitions of normal to pathologic findings in patients with fecal incontinence (FI) and to correlate PBT with anorectal physiologic findings. Methods: All female patients who had endoanal ultrasonography and PBT measurement for evaluation of FI were assessed and divided into three groups on the basis of PBT: 10 mm or less, 10 to 12 mm, more than 12 mm. The degree of FI (0 = complete continence; 20 = complete incontinence) was correlated with PBT. Results: For this study, 83 female patients with a mean age of 59.7 years (range, 30-88 years) had endoanal ultrasonography and PBT measurement. Sphincter defects were suggested by endoanal ultrasonography in 77% of the patients in the three groups as follows: 57 (97%) of 59 patients, 4 (36%) of 11 patients, and 3 (23%) of 13 patients. The mean external sphincter defect angle was 110°(range, 45-170°), and the mean FI score was 13.8. For 89% of the patients there was a history of vaginal delivery. As reported, 35% had undergone one or more prior perineal surgeries, 27% had both, and 4% denied having had either. A significant correlation between sphincter defect and PBT (p < 0.001) was noted. External sphincter defect angles were negatively correlated with PBT (p = 0.001). Conclusion: A PBT of 10 mm or less is considered abnormal, whereas a PBT of 10 mm to 12 mm is associated with sphincter defect in one-third of patients with FI. Those with a PBT of 12 mm or more are unlikely to harbor a defect unless they previously have undergone reconstructive perineal surgery.
British Journal of Surgery, 2012
Background: Anal acoustic reflectometry (AAR) is a reproducible technique providing a novel physiological assessment of anal sphincter function. It may have advantages over conventional anal manometry. The aims of this study were to determine the ability of AAR and anal manometry to identify changes in anal sphincter function in patients with faecal incontinence (FI) and to relate these changes to the severity of FI. Methods: Women with FI underwent assessment with AAR and anal manometry. All patients completed the Vaizey FI questionnaire and were classified according to symptom type (urge, passive or mixed) and integrity of the anal sphincters. The ability of AAR and anal manometry to correlate with symptom severity was evaluated. AAR was compared with anal manometry in detecting differences in anal sphincter function between symptomatic subgroups, and patients with and without a sphincter defect. Results: One hundred women with FI were included in the study. The AAR variables opening pressure, opening elastance, closing elastance and squeeze opening pressure correlated with symptom severity, whereas the manometric measurements maximum resting pressure and maximum squeeze pressure did not. Unlike anal manometry, AAR was able to detect differences in anal sphincter function between different symptomatic subgroups, whereas anal manometry was not. An anal sphincter defect was not associated with a significant change in anal sphincter function determined by either AAR or anal manometry. Conclusion: In the assessment of women with FI, AAR variables correlated with symptom severity and could distinguish between different symptomatic subgroups. AAR may help to guide management in these patients. Surgical relevance Anal manometry is the most widely used test of anal sphincter function, but has significant limitations. Considerable overlap between the values of anal manometry in continent and incontinent subjects has been reported, making some specialists view the test as unhelpful. Anal acoustic reflectometry (AAR) is a new, reproducible and clinically reliable technique that provides a dynamic physiological assessment of anal sphincter function. In this study AAR variables correlated with symptom severity in faecal incontinence, whereas anal manometry did not. Differences in anal sphincter function between specific symptomatic subgroups were detectable using AAR but not anal manometry. Anal sphincter defects were not associated with a significant change in anal sphincter function determined by either AAR or anal manometry. AAR appears to be a useful test in the investigative assessment of women with faecal incontinence. AAR may help to guide management in patients with faecal incontinence.
Investigation of fecal incontinence with endoanal ultrasound
Diseases of the Colon & Rectum, 1996
This study was undertaken to audit the results of endoanal ultrasound in patients with fecal incontinence. METHODS: Endoanal ultrasound was used to investigate 53 patients with fecal incontinence. Data for endoanal ultrasound were collected prospectively. Results were compared with clinical and obstetric history, obtained retrospectively from case notes, and were compared with manometric and operative findings. RESULTS: Sphincter abnormalities were identified in 42 of 53 patients. A total of 28 anterior defects were thought to be obstetric in origin. Fourteen other defects were secondary-to anal pathology or surgery. Patients with anterior external sphincter defects either had complete defects (4 patients; mean age, 31 years) or proxhnal defects (24 patients; mean age, 55 years). For patients with a proximal defect, 38 percent gave a history of obstetric tear, episiotomy, or forceps delivery, and the rest declared having had an apparently normal delivery. Only 50 percent had a sphincter weakness that was evident on clinical examination. Of those studied with manometry, only 21 percent had low squeeze pressures consistent with an external sphincter defect. CONCLUSIONS: Sphincter defects seen on ultrasound may not have a history of obstetric trauma or abnormal clinical and manometric findings. Endoanal ultrasound is recommended in all patients with fecal incontinence to detect occult sphincter defects. [
Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology, 2008
Objective To determine if there is a correlation between the sonographic extent of anal sphincter defects revealed by three-dimensional endoanal sonography (EAUS) and the degree of anal incontinence following primary repair of obstetric sphincter tears. Methods This was a follow-up study of women who had suffered anal sphincter tearing during vaginal delivery at Aalesund Hospital between January 2002 and July 2004. Incontinence was assessed by St Mark's score. The anal canal was assessed with three-dimensional endoanal sonography (EAUS). Sphincter defects were classified according to the Starck score and our new EAUS defect score. The EAUS images were interpreted by an observer blinded to other patient data. Results Sixty-one women were included in this study. Incontinence was reported by 32 (52%) women at a median of 21 (range, 9-35) months after delivery. Three-dimensional EAUS datasets were obtained in 55 women. There was a significant correlation between St Mark's score and our EAUS defect score (P = 0.034), and correlation approached but did not reach significance between St Mark's score and the Starck score (P = 0.053). There was a strong correlation between our EAUS defect score and the Starck score (P < 0.001). Conclusions There is a positive correlation between the extent of sphincter defects and the degree of anal incontinence following primary repair of obstetric sphincter tears. Our findings highlight the importance of adequate reconstruction of the anal sphincters during primary repair.