Immediate vs. delayed toe-to-thumb transfer: Is the infection rate greater? (original) (raw)
Related papers
Emergency toe-to-hand transfer for post-traumatic finger reconstruction: A multicenter case series
Injury, 2019
Background: The aim of this paper was to evaluate the outcomes of a homogenous series of emergency with a toe-to-hand transfer reconstructions with a different timing: immediate (same sur gical step with the debridement), primary (in the first 24 h), early (24-72 h after the debridement) or delayed (72 h-7 days). Materials and methods: Between 2001 and 2011, 31 patients received an immediate reconstruction with a toe-to-hand transfer. Data on indications, timing, type of surgery, complications and outcomes (sensory and motor recovery, patient satisfaction) were extrapolated and recorded. Results: Most of the procedures in our series (71%) were performed in the first 24 h. Survival rate was 100%. The only complications were 3 venous thrombosis (10%), solved with surgical re-exploration. Only 1 patient required secondary surgery for web deepening. No functional problems were recorded at the donor site. Sensibility recovery was acceptable in all patients; toe mobility was higher for the reconstructed thumb (85%) than for other digits (77%). Patient satisfaction was high with regard to functional results and lower but acceptable with regard to the aesthetic outcome. There was no difference in satisfaction rate of patients treated within 24 h or within 7 days. Conclusion: No conclusive evidence exists in favor of an immediate versus a primary, early or delayed emergency reconstruction. Emergency toe transfer for finger reconstruction is a safe procedure and its outcomes are comparable to those reported in the literature for secondary reconstruction. Immediate reconstruction has the advantage of an easier dissection, but early or delayed reconstruction gives more time to discuss with the patient and to plan surgery.
Background Toe-to-thumb transfer is an established procedure for reconstruction of traumatic thumb amputations. The four types of toe-to-thumb transfers are the second toe, the great toe, the wrap-around great toe and the trimmed great toe transfers. The purpose of this study is to conduct a systematic review of the literature to compare outcomes amongst different methods of toe-to-thumb transfers. Methods A literature search using 'toe-to-thumb transfer' combined with 'thumb injury' and 'thumb reconstruction' as keywords and limited to humans and the English language identified 633 studies. Studies were included in the review if they: (1) present primary data, (2) report three or more toe-to-thumb transfers for isolated complete traumatic thumb amputation between the metacarpophalangeal joint and the interphalangeal joint (both excluded) and (3) present functional outcome data. Results Twenty-five studies representing 450 toe-to-thumb transfers met the inclusion criteria. They included 101 second toe transfers, 196 great toe transfers, 122 wrap-around transfers and 31 trimmed toe transfers. The mean survival rate was 96.4%. No statistically significant differences could be detected between the four transfers with regards to survival, arc of motion, total active motion, grip and pinch strength and static two-point discrimination. Conclusions All four types of toe transfer procedures have predictably high survival rates and good patient satisfaction scores. The current data are inadequate to make any comments with regards to donor site morbidity. Till such data are available, an evidence-based recommendation for the superiority of a specific type of toe-to-thumb transfer cannot be made.
Immediate reconstruction of a nonreplantable thumb amputation by great toe transfer
Plastic and reconstructive surgery, 2009
When replantation of an avulsed/amputated thumb is not feasible, toe-to-hand transfer may be considered as a reconstructive option in appropriately chosen patients. Although selection criteria are purposefully restrictive, immediate one-stage transfer, as opposed to a delayed procedure, provides many advantages. Primary reconstruction reduces hospitalization and operative and recovery time. It also may expedite return of function and allow patients to return to work sooner. The ability of the patient to undergo extensive microvascular reconstruction at the time of injury, the psychological preparation required, and the need to understand potential risks are important factors to consider.
2020
BACKGROUND Microsurgical toe-to-hand transfer is a gold standard when it comes to repairing a thumb defect. Great toenail flap, thumbnail valva flap, free great toe and second toe transplantation are the common methods in thumb reconstruction. Second toe transplantation achieves good function, but poor aesthetics. Great toe transplantation achieves better aesthetics, but hindered walking, due to the foot’s loss of the great toe and moreover suboptimal thumb function. It is difficult to maintain both functional and aesthetic satisfaction in thumb reconstruction.METHODS We experimented with three different methods of toe to hand transfer. From October 2009 to July 2019, 30 patients with traumatic thumb defects received one of 3 different kinds of thumb reconstruction in our clinic according to their level of amputation. Divided evenly into three groups of ten, group one received a great toe transplantation, group two received a second toe transplantation, and group three received a co...
Cross-finger Flap to the Thumb: Quest for an Alternate Donor
Indian Journal of Plastic Surgery, 2020
Background Distal thumb injuries are managed by multiple local and regional flaps. The cross-finger flap (CFF) is one versatile flap used to cover such defects. The donor finger to the thumb is classically described to be the index finger (IF). However, with the index finger being the second most important finger, it causes further debilitation of the already injured hand. Our aim was to find an alternate donor finger to spare the index finger. Methods and Materials A prospective observational study was conducted on 10 patients with distal thumb injuries who were admitted between November 2018 and July 2019. Ring finger (RF) was used as donor for CFF in all the cases. The subjects were assessed for first web space angle, Kapandji score, total range of movement (TRM) of long fingers, and global hand function using Michigan hand outcome questionnaire (MHQ) after flap division. Results There was no first web contracture and TRM of IF remained unaffected. However, TRM of RF was significantly reduced. But this being a relatively unimportant finger, there was no significant reduction in global hand function, as evaluated by the MHQ score. Conclusion The ring finger is a good alternative for index finger as donor for CFF to the thumb, because it provides adequate tissue along with comfortable positioning and easy maintenance of local hygiene. Moreover, it preserves global hand function by sparing the IF.
Foot morbidity following toe to hand transfers
European Journal of Plastic Surgery, 2004
Toe-to-hand transfers to replace missing fingers have become a common reconstructive practice in our clinic. The purpose of this article is to evaluate morbidity of the donor site on the foot following the transfer. A group of 72 patients were assessed; 95 feet were examined post-transfers, i.e., 23 patients had transfers from both feet. The groups were arranged according to the numbers of patients as follows: group A (37 cases), second toe from one foot; group B (17 cases), second toes from both feet; group C (6 cases) with wrap-around flap; and group D (5 cases), the whole big toe. This was followed by group E (7 patients), who had the combination of the second and third toes harvested simultaneously, the great toe or wraparound flap in combination with harvesting the second toe from the same or contralateral foot. Scar quality of the donor site, standing on tiptoe and tiptoeing, discomfort after prolonged walking, stair climbing, need to change the shoe size, and participation in special activities, such as sports and overall patient satisfaction, were evaluated. The least significant problems occurred in patients with the second toe harvested, they had minimum complaints with static loading and minor complaints with dynamic loading. Patients with the second toes harvested from both feet also had minimum complaints with static loading and minor complaints in dynamic loading. More problems were observed with both static and dynamic loading in the patients with the great-toe transfer. The biggest troubles were reported by the patients with the wrap-around flap or in case of multiple toe transfers. Only one patient from the sample had to seek medical help of a specialist due to some problems following the toe harvest. In the retrospective subjective evaluation of patient satisfaction and benefits of the operation, all patients declared that they would undergo the reconstruction again despite the problems encountered at the donor site.
The Journal of Hand Surgery: Journal of the British Society for Surgery of the Hand, 2003
Since the popularization of microvascular toe transfer, there has been a tendency to relegate osteoplastic reconstruction techniques for the thumb to history. A case is presented which shows that a successful and well-planned osteoplastic thumb reconstruction can match microsurgical reconstruction in all functional activities. Cosmetically, the toe transfer is the better reconstructive option but it may cause significant donor site morbidity.
Bilateral microvascular second toe transfer for bilateral post-traumatic thumb amputation
Indian Journal of Plastic Surgery, 2012
ABSTRACTIn bilateral thumb amputations, the functional impairment is serious and every attempt should be made to reconstruct the thumb. We report a case of bilateral post traumatic thumb amputation, reconstructed with bilateral second toe transfer. Only two such cases have been reported in literature so far. Though there are various modalities for the reconstruction of thumb, microvascular toe transfer has its own merits. The convalescent period is minimal with excellent function. It is bilaterally symmetric and aesthetically superior to the osteoplastic reconstruction. The technical details are discussed, and the long term functional and aesthetic results are presented.