Emergences and affordances as opportunities to develop teachers’ mathematical content knowledge (original) (raw)

Abstract

Teachers' mathematical content knowledge has been under scrutiny for some time. This development is in the wake of learners' unsatisfactory performance in national examinations and international achievement tests. A widely held belief is that one, if not the most important, of the efforts to improve and enhance the performance and achievement in mathematics of learners is addressing teachers' mathematical content and pedagogical content knowledge through continuous professional development initiatives. The focus of this article is on the former. It describes how emergent and affording opportunities are brought to the fore from classroom observations and interactions in workshops and institutes with practising teachers. It concludes that this in situ dealing with mathematical content knowledge holds much promise for buy-in by teachers because it addresses an immediate need related to their practice.

Loading...

Loading Preview

Sorry, preview is currently unavailable. You can download the paper by clicking the button above.

References (14)

  1. Western Cape Education Department. Strategy for mathematics and physical science for grades 8-12: 2012-2015. Cape Town: WCED; 2012.
  2. Cordingley P, Bell M, Rundell B, Evans D. The impact of collaborative CPD on classroom teaching and learning, version 1.1. London (UK): Research Evidence in Education Library, EPPI-Centre, Social Science Research Unit, Institute of Education; 2003.
  3. Perrin-Glorian M-J, DeBlois L, Robert A. Individual practicing mathematics teachers: studies on their professional growth. In: Wood T, Krainer K, editors. International handbook of mathematics teacher education. Vol. 3, Participants in mathematics teacher education: individuals, teams, communities, and networks. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers; 2008. p. 35-59.
  4. Leikin R, Zazkis R. Learning through teaching mathematics : development of teachers' knowledge and expertise in practice. Vol. 5. Dordrecht: Springer; 2010.
  5. Zazkis R, Mamolo A. Reconceptualizing knowledge at the mathematical horizon. Learn Math. 2011;31(2):8-13.
  6. Rowland T. Explaining explaining. In: Nieuwoudt S, Laubser D, Dreyer H, editors. Proceedings of the 18th annual national congress of the Association for Mathematics Education of South Africa. Potchefstroom (South Africa): Northwest University; 2012. p. 1-13.
  7. Rowland T, Turner F. Developing and using the 'Knowledge Quartet': a framework for the observation of mathematics teaching. Math Educ. 2007;10(1):107-124.
  8. Rowland T, Huckstep P, Thwaites A. Elementary teachers' mathematics subject knowledge: the knowledge quartet and the case of Naomi. J Math Teach Educ. 2005;8(3):255-281.
  9. Kieran C, Guzma ´n J. Role of task and technology in provoking teacher change: a case of proofs and proving in high school algebra. In: Leikin R, Zazkis R, editors. Learning through teaching mathematics : development of teachers' knowledge and expertise in practice. Vol. 5. Dordrecht: Springer; 2010. p. 127-152.
  10. Mason J, Davis J. Fostering and sustaining mathematics thinking through problem solving. Geelong: Deakin University; 1991.
  11. Watson A, Mason J. Questions and prompts for mathematical thinking. Derby: Association of Teachers of Mathematics; 1998.
  12. Council for Higher Education. Report on the national review of academic and professional programmes in education. Pretoria (South Africa): CHE; 2010. (HE Monitor No. 11).
  13. Hill HC, Loewenberg Ball D. Learning mathematics for teaching: results from California's mathematics professional development institutes. J Res Math Educ. 2004;35(5):330-351.
  14. Brown M. Some points relating to the teaching of mathematics. 2010. Available from: http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm200910/cmselect/cmchilsch/340/100210