War and Peace in Kant’s and Hegel’s Consideration (original) (raw)
Related papers
Kant's Perpetual Peace (1795) and the Russia-Ukraine/NATO Conflict
Phronimon, 2024
The work that I wish to concentrate on here, Perpetual Peace, is situated at least in the converging fields of (international and constitutional) law and politics. Given its date of publication (1795), Kant's preceding works may all safely be said to have prepared his thinking for the progressive ideas expressed there, but to disclose the specific threads that connect each of these 12 preceding works with Perpetual Peace would require far more than a mere article. For this reason, I have confined myself largely to drawing such connections between the latter work and Kant's seminal (and famous) essay, What is Enlightenment? (1784) before elaborating on Perpetual Peace and its implications for the current global situation, which will, therefore, also have to be reconstructed, unavoidably, from my own perspective. This article, therefore, addresses the question of "lasting" world peace through the lens of Kant's essay on the conditions for "perpetual peace." This is done by listing each of the six "Preliminary Articles" and three "Definitive Articles" stated by Kant, in turn, and comparing their respective requirements to current events in the extant world, specifically those surrounding the Russia-Ukraine/NATO conflict. It is demonstrated that, although Kant admitted that the principles he listed comprised an "ideal", the present era marks a set of conditions further removed from lasting peace than ever before.
The Theory of Conflict in Kant and Hegel
This essay will examine and compare the role conflict plays in Kant's and Hegel's respective notions of historical progress. I will begin by acknowledging the centrality of conflict within the Kantian system and, conversely, the fundamental importance of harmony for Hegel. Having established those positions, I intend to argue
Kant’s Studies in Ukrainian Philosophy of Soviet Period
Future Human Image
This writing is devoted to the brief review of Immanuel Kant's philosophy studies and receptions of his philosophical concepts within the Ukrainian philosophy of Soviet period. Such attempt is actually pertinent because nowadays we definitely need to reconsider the soviet philosophical heritage for better understanding the real value of any philosophical conclusions and worldview-concerning statements which were made in the times of soviet ideology hegemony. Additionally, mentioned reconsidering is presently urgent because Ukrainian intellectual culture is now looking for its identity and is trying to identify the stillremaining ideological totalitarian elements which spoil the originality and objectiveness of its products. The present review attempts to identify which totalitarian intentions and prejudices were used to interpret and evaluate the Immanuel Kant's heritage in the texts written by several selected Ukrainian philosophers of the Soviet period. Nevertheless, it's obvious that absolutely impossible to avoid talking about Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel's philosophical position interpretation by the same authors. Kant's and Hegel's soviet-Ukrainian interpretations were often connected, because there was a general trend of soviet Marxist history of philosophy to interpret Kant as the "worse" version of Hegel. To fulfill the general image of Kant's philosophy interpretation in Ukrainian philosophy and its future perspectives, this paper also delivers some common information about the whole historical path of Kant's interpretations and receptions.
Back from the USSR: Kant, Kaliningrad and World Peace
International Relations, 2006
The year 2004 marked the bicentenary of Immanuel Kant’s death. This article evaluates the main arguments of Kant’s essay on perpetual peace in the light of developments in world politics since his time. How well have his ideas stood the test of time? Kant’s essay is placed in the context of his philosophy as a whole and through a close textual analysis the value of his propositions is assessed. The article looks at the Provisional and Definitive Articles in their mutual relation and places a good deal more emphasis than is usual upon the two supplements and appendix. Finally the article takes the complex circumstances of Kant’s home city, Kaliningrad, as a brief test case for his own theories.
An Evaluation of Kant's Theory of Perpetual Peace in the Field of Contemporary Political Philosophy
The International Journal of Humanities, 2008
Philosophical sketch of Immanuel Kant (1724-1804) on the primary conditions for Peace and co-existence between states is reflected in his Perpetual Peace. In Kant's view, three primary conditions of perpetual peace of a republican government in every country are based on a civil constitution, establishment of a federation of free states, and cosmopolitan right of individuals as world citizens. The foundations of republican system, i.e. freedom for all members of the society as human beings, belonging of each individual to a public code of law as subject, and equality before law as a citizen, are important in Kant's political philosophy. Two primary responsibilities for Kant's federation of free states, i.e. non-interference in the internal affairs of member states, and upholding of a unified front against extraterritorial aggression, suffer from ambiguity and inadequacy, and is therefore vulnerable. Kant's formulation of "a unified world government" is caut...
Hegel on the Russian Revolution and its Stalinist Aftermath
Hegel's philosophy of revolution has been widely studied and much debated. Some scholars see Hegel as a tiresome defender of existing political orders, while others point to his enthusiastic, if partial, support for the French Revolution, as well as for many modern revolutions or insurrectionary movements, both ancient and modern. Following this last line of argument, my paper attempts a Hegelian interpretation of the Russian Revolution, taking into account important aspects such as the subversive dynamic of Hegelian political concepts, the relationship between class and state in Hegel's political philosophy, the overwhelmingly anti-feudal character of the Russian Revolution, and, finally, the stabilisation and distortion of the Russian Revolution under the Stalinist regime, which, in Hegelian terms, can be seen as a new form of absolute freedom (terror) aimed at solving the main social dilemma of modernity identified by Hegel in his Elements of the Philosophy of Right, namely poverty.
Since the dawn of its existence the concept of peace has, of course, given rise to a plethora of meanings. The concept has been and still is consistently employed in both inter- as well as intrapersonal matters of discourse. In accordance with the former, one can rightly ask what the concept of peace is to mean within the domain of (international) politics and how it can be obtained in practice. What then are we to make of the idea of a ‘perpetual peace’? If peace is negatively and stringently defined as a mere absence of war, it is not surprising to find that a perpetual peace has not been established, given the history and nature of humankind. Rather, the concept of a perpetual peace seems an ideal at best, the materialization of which difficult if not outright impossible to obtain. Perhaps it was with a similar hint of irony with which a Dutch innkeeper once decided to name his inn ‘The Perpetual Peace’, accompanied with an image of a graveyard on his signboard. It was this scenario that too, perhaps, prompted Kant to awake from yet another ‘slumber’, culminating in his often overlooked and underestimated essay ‘Perpetual Peace: A Philosophical Sketch’. In the first section of this foundational essay, Kant argues for six Preliminary Articles that he conceived as a priori conditions that need to be satisfied in order to approximate peace proper, viz., perpetual peace. In the second section, Kant outlines three Definite Articles in which he provides a foundational framework on which a perpetual peace is thought able to rest. The major aim of this thesis is to provide an analysis of Kant’s Preliminary Articles as formulated in his Perpetual Peace. In doing so, I will focus primarily on the relevant sections of his essay and provide secondary commentary where I deem it valuable. Finally, I will situate each of these conditions in a contemporary context and investigate to what extent the Dutch political system as being embedded in international law conforms to the necessary conditions here specified. As will become clear, several key documents implemented within the international legal system do appear to have adopted elements of the Kantian framework discussed. In order to make the translation from the 18th century to the modern world feasible, I will make use of a broad interpretation of the conditions in question without thereby losing their conceptual core.