Italy: Between Local Traditions and Global Aspirations (original) (raw)
Related papers
The slow pace of institutional change in the Italian food system
Appetite, 2006
Recent surveys show that Italians have little trust in the food they eat. This seems at odds with the world-wide popularity of Italian food, and the very prominent role that the agro-food sector has in the national economy and culture. This paper aims to explain this apparent contradiction by examining recent political and economic changes in the food sector. From the analysis it emerges that, facing institutional crises and food scandals, Italian politicians have left the task of reassuring consumers to the market. However, the market actors’ strategy has been to prioritise the discourse of food quality, but give little weight to some other important preoccupation of consumers, such as safety. To address these concerns a more proactive role of the State would be required. An actual concern of public institutions with consumer needs, institutional efficiency, transparency and accountability emerges as a crucial factor in restoring and maintaining trust. Keywords: Trust; Food safety; Institutions; Regulation; Typicality; Italy
European Societies 3(2): 213- 44., 2001
The public debate around food confidence stimulated by food scares, the opening up of wider food markets and the introduction of GM foods provides an opportunity to analyse citizens’ identification with their community sociologically, as it is reproduced through mundane practices. In order to do so, this article examines the GM food debate in Italy and the implications for food and agricultural policy of Austria’s entry into the EU. Britain, with its highly industrialized agriculture and political commitment to open markets and new technologies, acts as a bench-mark. We distinguish between disembedded and embedded trust regimes; the former being predominant in freer markets and the latter a resource which can be mobilized in cases where remnants of ‘traditional’ agricultural production and supply can still be found (Italy and Austria). The increasing emphasis upon the regional origin of food, its traceability and organic production by key actors – the state, consumers’ movements, retailers and marketing boards – we interpret as a confidence-building strategy which attempts to address deficits in disembedded trust resulting from widening chains of interdependency, crises such as BSE and the introduction of unfamiliar new technologies.
Supply chain relationships and quality certification schemes: a case study in fisheries
2000
The Italian fishery supply chain is highly fragmented and lacking in organization; consequently most firms experience high operating costs, low sale prices and limited profitability. The purpose of this paper is to contribute to the assessment of the effectiveness of policy intervention, in particular the creation of a collective label of origin, to promote local fishery products and increase their
In the context of a special issue of the Journal of Rural Studies on more-than-economic motivations for farmers' cooperation, this article aims to analyse the tensions and contending views of the cooperative movement in Italy with special attention to the agricultural sector and to the emergence of the new model of social cooperatives in the last decades of the 20th century. We interpret this emergence and its codification in law as the decoupling of more-than-economic motivations of cooperation from the mainstream Italian cooperative sector and their reinstatement in a new, but separate model of social cooperation more closely linked to community-and solidarity-oriented initiatives. The presence of institutional tensions and frictions hints at the fact that cooperatives have a multi-faced nature expressed in the not always easy coexistence of a cooperative economy and a cooperative movement. After the II World War, as Italian cooperatives in general and particularly agricultural cooperatives moved towards a productivist model and a 'competitive market' paradigm, the more-than-economic aspects have continued to inspire movements for social and community economies. In the 1990s the social economy project was appropriated but somehow 'sanitized' by the cooperative movement through the legally sanctioned establishment of social cooperatives and their confinement to specific sections within national cooperative federations. Later on, while the emergence of social cooperatives has had little influence on the functioning and orientation of traditional agricultural cooperatives and federations, the reinstatement of a social function for agriculture has taken place at the much more fluid interface between social cooperation, on the one hand, and civic agriculture movements rooted in alternative food networks and community-oriented initiatives, on the other. It is only recently that the cooperative movement has tried catch up with the new paradigms of alternative agriculture and rural development through the experimentation at regional level of the cooperative di comunit a (community cooperatives), that operate to reaffirm the role of multifunctional and multi-stakeholder cooperatives in rural/territorial development.
Cost E30. Economic …, 2005
Summary Land ownership fragmentation, the lack in horizontal integration among the forest owners and the limited entrepreneurship of the forest managers are the main factors affecting the competitiveness of forest–wood/non-wood/services–consumer chain in Italy.
Political economy of Alternative Agriculture in Italy
This chapter analyzes the histories and strategies of the most prominent advocates of the ‘quality turn’ in Italian agriculture and traces their evolving — and at times ambiguous — relations with the conventional agro-food system. We focus on a set of actors that emerged at different stages between the 1970s and the 1990s: the organic movement, the ‘‘Campagna Amica’’ foundation promoted by Coldiretti (the largest farmers’ union in the country), Slow Food and the loose but growing network of Solidarity Purchasing Groups (Gruppi di Acquisto Solidale, GAS). Following Levidow (2014), the ‘alternative’ character of these actors is identified with their rejection of the ‘life sciences’ and ‘decomposability’ paradigms that characterize the dominant agro-food system and their support to an ‘agroecological’ approach and an ‘integral product identity’ paradigm.